Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Imagine if you can lifting the head on your car 38mm, that is the problem with the RB30 block, the high deck setup lifts it 20mm, the BC kit leaves it where it is

BC kit 2.9ltr

RIPs is 3ltrs

Nitto is 3.2ltrs

The BC and type R poncams is the best option for what you want alround, but wait and see what Jim wants to tell you ( 3.2ltr kit as he is part owner of Nitto iirc ) and get a costing for it

Then contact Power Tune and get a costing for the BC kit, by the you will have a price from Rob so you can better decide what to do

RIPS can do 3litr or 3.2....most of the last few big engines they've built have been 3.2ltre.

Imagine if you can lifting the head on your car 38mm, that is the problem with the RB30 block, the high deck setup lifts it 20mm, the BC kit leaves it where it is

BC kit 2.9ltr

RIPs is 3ltrs

Nitto is 3.2ltrs

The BC and type R poncams is the best option for what you want alround, but wait and see what Jim wants to tell you ( 3.2ltr kit as he is part owner of Nitto iirc ) and get a costing for it

Then contact Power Tune and get a costing for the BC kit, by the you will have a price from Rob so you can better decide what to do

I am talking to Rob/Rips in NZ and waiting for a 2nd reply, at this stage he said what I said, if I do not know what I am doing and want it hassle free then get all the work done on site. A very honest reply and I am waiting for him to answer the email I just sent him. Seems like a very honest bloke :)

It is good to have you blokes around, thanks :)

RIPS can do 3litr or 3.2....most of the last few big engines they've built have been 3.2ltre.

That doesn't surprise me as there isnt much difference in building a 30 to a 3.2, what would be interesting to know is if he makes his own 3.2 or buys and fits the Nitto kit or some other premade kit

Also this re: Building an RB26 for response going off-topic

I am interested in the intended purpose of building this 3.2 torque monster

Just because have the money to build this I am uncertain if your going to be happy driving it.

I'd try and get a drive in same or similar car first.

Everyone is talking block build what else in the drive train is planned. Also Fuel supply, braking, Engine management etc..

For this sort of build plan I have to quote a line in a FnF movie

"It's not how you stand by your car, it's how you race your car"

Ironic that this thread started with a post about going off topic...and yet here we are again!

Anyway, a quick comment on this:

Imagine if you can lifting the head on your car 38mm, that is the problem with the RB30 block, the high deck setup lifts it 20mm, the BC kit leaves it where it is

BC kit 2.9ltr

RIPs is 3ltrs

Nitto is 3.2ltrs

The BC and type R poncams is the best option for what you want alround, but wait and see what Jim wants to tell you ( 3.2ltr kit as he is part owner of Nitto iirc ) and get a costing for it

Then contact Power Tune and get a costing for the BC kit, by the you will have a price from Rob so you can better decide what to do

There is a much more important difference in the RB30/OS Giken 3l/GTRNUR versus a stroked crank in a standard RB26 block.

One of the biggest weaknesses in the rb26 setup even from standard is the high rod/stroke ratio which means that poor little piston is rocking back and forth in the cylinder at a million miles an hour compared to taller engines where they spend more time going up and down with less angle.

Putting a 2.8/2.8 or god forbid even 2.9 crank into an rb26 block exacerbates this issue. The engine is less efficient and wears more. Putting a taller block in helps reduce the problem

Ironic that this thread started with a post about going off topic...and yet here we are again!Anyway, a quick comment on this:There is a much more important difference in the RB30/OS Giken 3l/GTRNUR versus a stroked crank in a standard RB26 block.One of the biggest weaknesses in the rb26 setup even from standard is the high rod/stroke ratio which means that poor little piston is rocking back and forth in the cylinder at a million miles an hour compared to taller engines where they spend more time going up and down with less angle.Putting a 2.8/2.8 or rajab forbid even 2.9 crank into an rb26 block exacerbates this issue. The engine is less efficient and wears more. Putting a taller block in helps reduce the problem

And I theory this is correct, but how does it translate Into the real world where practical rules, IIRC the powertune R34 had the 2.9 and made some big power and as far as I'm aware still running, just no longer in the that R34, as well as that GTRNURs RB31.5 would have had a similar rod/stroke ratio which is essentianally the same as an SR20 and all of which make good power and times and don't wear out in a 1000km like people make out will happen with these rod/stroke ratios, in the real world the difference is just BS

well I don't think it's that simple, a couple of cars making lots of power for a few klm isn't really the whole story. I'm sure you've seen the same, every time I pull down an rb26 with a few klm on it there is plenty of sideways wear on the bore.

hell when it comes down to it you can even fit a rb30 crank into an rb26 block with a little clearancing, but it's just not good for a long and happy engine life.

I didn't think the 26 bore had enough length for the 30 stroke which is the idea of the 20mm spacer and longer sleeves, Ian put a modified 30 crank into the 26 block with SR rods and I'm sure he did quiet a few KMs with that setup and when pulled down it showed very little wear IIRC, a loose bore will wear quicker then a short rod ratio correctly sized

OS GIKEN 3.0 138.35/86. RS ratio = 1.608

RB 30 is 152.7/85 = 1.79

Tomei 2.8: 119.5/77.7 = 1.53

Stock is 121.5/73.7 = 1.648

Duncan, how many kms is "a few kms"? 50,000? 100,000, 200,000?

Can you do the BC kit and Ian's to please, though I think he has his calculated already on his build thread, and the SR20 for shits and giggles :D

Can't find the 2.9 rod length. I can only assume it would be around the 118.5 to 120 mark depending on pin height.

Ian's is 136.3/90 ( I think it's a 90 mm crank off the top if my head) = 1.514

For what it's worth, after 36,000 km in my stroker the pistons and bores almost brand new. Too much theory, text book reading and not enough STFU and drive it. Refresh the engine at 100,000 kms. That's prob 10 years worth of driving for most people in a GTR. By then most won't even own the car.... Or it's turned a bearing so it needs to be done anyway.

  • Like 1

Rod stroke ratio can play a big part in it.

Recently ive looked inside 3 engine at the bores and pistons, all 1000+ Hp motors, a RB28 stroker, a 2JZ 3.4 stroker and a RB30 standard stroke.

Both the strokers showed excessive side wall loading wear on the bores and pistons on the thrust side, right about in the middle of the piston travel point in the bores, the RB30 looked the least wear by a long shot.

Until i had seen it i wouldn't have believed how much of a difference it makes.....

  • Like 1

Rod stroke ratio can play a big part in it.

Recently ive looked inside 3 engine at the bores and pistons, all 1000+ Hp motors, a RB28 stroker, a 2JZ 3.4 stroker and a RB30 standard stroke.

Both the strokers showed excessive side wall loading wear on the bores and pistons on the thrust side, right about in the middle of the piston travel point in the bores, the RB30 looked the least wear by a long shot.

Until i had seen it i wouldn't have believed how much of a difference it makes.....

Glad you mentioned that. I have for ages discussed, theorised and observed certain affects from different cars which would have different rod angles with some other aspects pretty similar and while a lot of people would (and do) convincingly argue that the r/s ratio doesn't have that much of an effect and certain things (ie, dwell time at TDC and peak acceleration) *seem* trivial I am seeing patterns that suggest these little bits have definite tangible effects on a lot of things. The funny thing though is on the other hand, most of the time people can't really tell the difference and if you hadn't seen the bore damage or any of the other pro's and con's that people debate about weren't spotted under analytical eyess - would they have really mattered?

I personally so far am sold as on the old proven RB30DET, a lot cheaper than going a stroker - have an awesome R/S ratio, sound awesome, strong as, and generally have more positives versus negatives than the other options.... at least in my opinion.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
×
×
  • Create New...