Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Funny my new gtr 33 just did 270rwkws with front drive shaft taken out. Fully stock with 3inches turbo bacm exhust. Not sure if the last version of gtr33 had some tricks into its sleeves.

Nah that's about right

I seen a r32 gtr with just catback dynoed at Unigroup back awhile ago made 250rwkw on rwd dyno std computer

And I was struggling to make 230rwkw on my sr20 cams turbo injector afm tune

6cylinders especially gtr make power very easy

Funny my new gtr 33 just did 270rwkws with front drive shaft taken out. Fully stock with 3inches turbo bacm exhust. Not sure if the last version of gtr33 had some tricks into its sleeves.

Sounds off, doubt its a stock ECU tbh. Seem more than a few of them struggle to hit 260 tuned on standard turbos.

12% I think is the agreed difference between awkw and rwkw for the GTRs.

270/1.12 = 241 awkw which sounds about right if it's missing the boost restrictor?

Most R33/4 owners wouldn't bother on a RWD dyno due to having to remove the front shaft. Whereas on the R32 its as simple as pulling a fuse, or flicking a switch if you've got it hooked up that way

Edited by Blackkers

But a highest reading out of a stock GTR on this dyno was 207rwkws on factory tune. My boost curve appears to be laggier also, but not as laggy as the N-1. Pretty much spot on with -9s. But every thing is stock. Its the only Navy Blue GTR Trent's ever seen either. I always gets stooged with cars that makes stupid power.

gtrfront500.jpg

This is power vs a normal GTR33 on stock ecu:

powervs.JPG

Boost vs Stock R33 GTR:

boostvsstd.JPG

And AFR

afr.JPG

Timing, ignition, fuel, AFR, Pretty much every thing is spot on. Std GTR 33 tuned with PFC was getting 245rwkws on 14psi. While this is fully standard with a cat back exhaust. It felt very different to drive compare to other GTR 33s I've looked recently, I was expecting around 180rwkws not 270rwkws.

So well this is my base line for this GTR.

+1 for the 'not actually stock turbos'

Given -7's and -9's and -5's look identical from the outside to stock turbos, I'm going to say they aren't

...they are also what Hypergear are up against in terms of 'bolt on 100% legal high flow-looking' turbo options, curious to see if Stao can get turbos to respond that well and make 375rwkw on E85 and look entirely standard which is what a -9 will do

Or more than 500+rwkw which is what gtx2863 fronts will do in standard housings :P

The previous owner is a farmer, he knew nothing about cars, it was sitting in his garage for a long time. He said he only driven it to his mechanic for a oil change every 4 month, and clocked 4000KMs for the past 5 years. He's wife made him to sale it.

I'm more interested in the Rb26dett power and response thread. I will be starting with a single setup once the manifold is ready. Too much hassle getting E85 when needed, This car will be running on P98 fuel.

Update compared to my previous result with the following changes:

1. Rebuilt actuator arm by Stao with more preload (around 3mm) - this is a Z shaped one as opposed to the original straight rod

2. Rebuilt & tucked in exhaust system:

  • JJR bellmouth - bottom half has been recut/customised to run as close to the floor as possible
  • Venom 5" cat - bought without flanges, which were welded on at the exhaust shop for best alignment
  • HKS Super Drager cat back (R33 coupe model) - mid muffler replaced and moved further back for better clearance, most of the piping redone in 3"...

3. Retune at Chasers

Result: 275rwkw @ ~20psi, BP 98 Octane (red line)

Without airbox lid, snorkel and filter: 285rwkw (top blue line)

It also has better response than before so the actuator and exhaust mods have helped.

The intake is restricting it a bit and I reckon that the Trust turnflow might be at its limits, too.

14988174665_c40106fbf1_z.jpg

Thanks heaps Stao and others for your help on this!!

Great drifting :thumbsup:

Result sent in, This is our ATR45 turbo on an Ford XR6 BA. Final result of 400rwkws on P98 fuel internally gated bolton at 19psi of boost.

atr45ford400rwkw.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...