Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did a turbo change just making sure that I'm not going to spend money on a new cooler kit for nothing, Now with a ATR43SS-2 on board making no differences to boost drop. New intercooler is getting fitted on the 2nd of April, will update results then.

For now, 276rwkws @15psi with cooler restrictions:

atr43ss2boostdrop.png

atr43ss2276rwkw.png

Also ATR28SS-2 powered S13 SR20det with 264/12mm cams. Final result of 299rwkws @ 22psi, P98 fuel:

atr28299rwkw.jpg

atr28299rwkwboost.jpg

One more piece of Red top SR20det data. This is using 264 inlet and 272 exhaust. Running our SL20.5 Turbo in 8cm turbine. Car made 477rwhp / 356rwkws on 23psi E85 fuel. Graph running against a Apexi rx6 turbo that was previously installed. Dyna dynamics roller dyno, shoot out mode.

power.jpg

twoturbos.JPG

  • Like 1

Based on the cooler behavior from earlier test runs. I've made another special application turbo: ATR45-SRFC

This one is made for the minimum amount of boost drop, making some some where towards the 300rwkws mark on pump fuel. It is a bolton turbo just like the ATR43SS/G series. So this will be your recommended turbo if you you've got this type of intercooler installed chasing similar power levels.

Final result of 292rwkws @ 19psi after cooler. Internally gated, P98 fuel.

power.JPG

boostlabeled.jpg

Another prototype, this one is made for internally gated XR6 BA and FGs. Unlike the GTX3582, this turbocharger is also fitted with a much larger exhaust wheel working with a big 40mm internal gate. The approximated HP out put on this turbocharger is around the 430rwkws internally gated on pump 98 fuel. Releasing few evaluation units at special prices, PM if any one is interested to trail.

atr45ssfront.jpg

atr45ssrear.JPG

I know very little about the pyhsical size specs of turbos but is it possible to fit a GT30 turbine to a GT28 core, im wondering if that would be possible and crop it down to 58x52ish then stick a GTX67 comp wheel on it to make your own 5867 that will take machined -5 GTR housings for that factory fit ?

Or can the -5 housings bolt onto a GTX3067R agian with the cropped turbine ?

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

You can use your existing compressor wheel and run with our ATR28SS-2 turbine wheels in your current turbine housings. That will drop back pressure, cooler EGT, and makes more torque.

:(

Thanks, Back to the drawing board

Oh you changed it, so would this be worth doing for a responsive 500kw at all 4

I have 458kw now with HKS GT-RSs

Backpressure is killing me at 28psi at the moment and im thinking it is cause of the size difference of the wheels as well as the size of the 53mm T28 turbine wheel being a bit to small

Yep sounds like you need 1 good turbo instead Micky! :P

Based on the cooler behavior from earlier test runs. I've made another special application turbo: ATR45-SRFC

This one is made for the minimum amount of boost drop, making some some where towards the 300rwkws mark on pump fuel. It is a bolton turbo just like the ATR43SS/G series. So this will be your recommended turbo if you you've got this type of intercooler installed chasing similar power levels.

Final result of 292rwkws @ 19psi after cooler. Internally gated, P98 fuel.

When making pressure measurements you have to take the air temperature into consideration.

The air before the FMIC is much warmer and hence less dense which attributes to higher volume / pressure.

After the FMIC it's the inverse of the of what I just wrote.

When making pressure measurements you have to take the air temperature into consideration.

The air before the FMIC is much warmer and hence less dense which attributes to higher volume / pressure.

After the FMIC it's the inverse of the of what I just wrote.

I tried explaining that, unfortunately the cooler was blamed for the IAT too which is pretty funny. :P

I think he realised it was the compressor that was causing the heat, hence the new turbo that was trialled.

You can use your existing compressor wheel and run with our ATR28SS-2 turbine wheels in your current turbine housings. That will drop back pressure, cooler EGT, and makes more torque.

Any possiblity of specs for that wheel and i would like to go smaller on comp wheel to help with response, the 71mm i think is a bit big for what my goal is, do you have anything around the 65mm mark that will cover 500kw in twin form

Also i have a pair of -7s here im not using, i believe the exhaust housing is the same as the RSs just need to get .60 comp covers

Any possiblity of specs for that wheel and i would like to go smaller on comp wheel to help with response, the 71mm i think is a bit big for what my goal is, do you have anything around the 65mm mark that will cover 500kw in twin form

Also i have a pair of -7s here im not using, i believe the exhaust housing is the same as the RSs just need to get .60 comp covers

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

According to this the AR's are different between -7 and RS's.

I have 64mm comp billet wheels, Those are from ATR28SS15. It peeked 281rwkws, and averaging about 275rwkws pump 98 fuel, on my SR. On dyno it is slightly more responsive then a 2871 while made more power.

Orange is ATR28SS15 in .64 rear, Green is GT2871 in .64 rear. Both are S14s with BC Step 2 cams. on pump 98 fuel.

vsgt2871power.JPG

Slight boost control issue on that particular day:

vsgt2871boost.JPG

With boost controller fixed:

power.jpgboost.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...