Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes its in the video. Here's one more customer's video. I believe this is an ATR43SS-2 running 20psi internally gated. Making 294rwkws on pump 98 fuel.

The stag now rests in Donny @ Forced Motorworx capable hands. To say I'm a little excited is an understatement.

  • 2 weeks later...

here's some more R33 vs. SS2 love, but this one is externally gated - had to turn down the boost to 1.3bar during the day as the head was lifting at 1.6bar LOL

  • Like 2

Nice video footage. :)

This is a set of rather unusual high flow jobs. Pair of high flowed 2860-5s into ATR28SS15. Its going to a Rb30det engine with Rb26 head. Hopefully they will solve the back pressure issues currently experiencing with GTRS turbine wheel. One more thing that I'm alittle concern is the back pressure in the exhaust system as the ATR28SS15 is ideally made to run on a single 3 inches turbo back system, that GTR is pretty good of having 4 inches turbo back exhaust, still have to be shared with two turbo how ever. I've made some oversized thrust collars for that purpose, hopefully be seeing close to 500rwkws with those once fully running.

frontnback.JPG

One more prototype of SAT prototype is made for my single high mount GTR. This one was engineered to make around 450awkws on the current setup without additional lag. It made huge amount of torque, and clutch is gone. This one will definitely be making alot more power, and response is no different to the traditional SAT. Nismo Super coppermix is going in, hopefully be back on the dyno in two weeks time.

carondyno.JPG

atr45satssoncar.jpg

Vs standard ATR45SAT (pink and yellow is from the new prototype, stopped when clutch gave away)

power.jpg

Nice video footage. :)

This is a set of rather unusual high flow jobs. Pair of high flowed 2860-5s into ATR28SS15. Its going to a Rb30det engine with Rb26 head. Hopefully they will solve the back pressure issues currently experiencing with GTRS turbine wheel. One more thing that I'm alittle concern is the back pressure in the exhaust system as the ATR28SS15 is ideally made to run on a single 3 inches turbo back system, that GTR is pretty good of having 4 inches turbo back exhaust, still have to be shared with two turbo how ever. I've made some oversized thrust collars for that purpose, hopefully be seeing close to 500rwkws with those once fully running.

frontnback.JPG

I noticed you have removed the divider between the turbine outlet and the wastegate, just curious of the thinking behind that ?

The exhaust is twin 3" through twin 3" cats into single 4" at the mid muffler then 4" out the rest, back pressure from exhaust shouldn't be an issue :)

  • Like 1

The rear wheels are bigger, once machined the divider turned out to be very thin. Since the compressors are lot bigger also, it will create greater turbine flow. Usually internal waste gates don't at full 90 degrees, the divider would limits the amount of bleeding area around the disc resulting unlimited boost creep, that is some thing else I had in concerns, but I won't know till they are in the car and running.

My recent RAC speed event.

SS2 ~410hp

Despite my over steer incident, my best time of the day.

Great footage :thumbsup:

The rear wheels are bigger, once machined the divider turned out to be very thin. Since the compressors are lot bigger also, it will create greater turbine flow. Usually internal waste gates don't at full 90 degrees, the divider would limits the amount of bleeding area around the disc resulting unlimited boost creep, that is some thing else I had in concerns, but I won't know till they are in the car and running.

I figured there would be a reason, was just curious as to what it was and figured it might have to do with get gases away from turbine, unfortunately I run split dumps and will have to put something back in there so the split dump works the way it is meant to :/

Yep, these are mine and are replacing my GT-RSs in the hope of gaining some response and allow me to run more boost to see if I can crack 500awkw, currently at 458awkw @ 28psi

Cool! I remember drunk conversations at Mick's place a couple of years ago playing around with ideas like this - we were discussing FP based similar solutions, but this works. Will be very interesting to see how it comes out :)

I still wonder/worry a bit about the housings and potential restrictions beyond the actual wheels themselves which could hamper progress but I hope they are unfounded. When do you aim to have this all together?

And by the way, I've made some custom exhaust wheels that is for the GTR OEM high flows. They are engineered to support 300 ~ 350awkws region on pump fuel and response will have similar to stock twins. My car's waiting for bits and pieces, so if any one is interested to evaluate please let me know, I will put a special offer for $1200 on both turbochargers.

  • Like 1

The twin atr28ss1.5 should have no problems cracking 500kw on your rb2630 setup

A single ss1.5 on my old sr20 made a very easy 251kw on 20psi and 266kw with a larger

.86 rear housing and 24psi

Only thing stopping you from running 25+psi maybe the back pressure from the turbines unless stao has changed them as I got mine a while ago 1-2years ago and smaller rear housing will be the best for response

I gained 16kw from going from a .64ar to .86ar but full boost went from 3750rpm to 4100rpm also 4psi more but felt faster and more responsive with the .64 ar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...