Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon the delivery of the turbo plays a definite part in the ET, and the on-off responsiveness between gears in the trap speed and ET for sure. The G3 as Stao says has good 'rush' up top, but a little lazy in and out of gears (on stock manifold low mount I mean) and kind of like a light switch delivery in 1st and 2nd which makes juggling bog/wheelspin hard off the line.

And obviously driver experience at the strip :P

+1

It wasn't easy to get off the line- first run i bogged hard and the next I fried the tyres. I think I'm going to need a fair bit of seat time to get the launch right!

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

Block up BOV helps.

The launch won't affect you trap speeds much most 1-2mph the better you launch better 60ft you trap speed will be lower

But yes it will affect you et I think its for every 0.1 quicker off your 60ft it's 0.2 off your et

So you will need a 2.0 60ft and you will be in the 12.8 but proberly 113 or 114mph

Yeh I think Luke's and my trap results are very effected by boost response between gears. Took the car for a drive the other night and tested that out, and I've got about half a second to a full second of lag between each gear change.

SS2 FTW!!

comp.JPG

This is the latest G3 turbocharger. It has stepped down back to a 56T from 58. I've focused it on better throttle response and transition response.

The prototype about is built in ball bearing. It felt pretty good on road comes on boost with very light throttle. hitting the dyno again on Wednesday and see how it goes.

Yes it has stepped down to 56T. No point going for a 58T if majority don't have a setup and a engine for that extra power. This one was focused on throttle and transition response. It makes an great every day road turbocharger within the budget.

This casting is in steel as usual.

I'm dreaming of the day you trim down the turbine to something under 80.... I think that would work better for response again.

The sl2 wheel is 61mm with a mid 70s trim. You saw the response on that vs your ss2 when they were running the same compressor... Just do eeeet

Well it made 30kws difference in power with less boost compare to the L2 turbine. Also peeks boost at the exact same RPM which is pretty interesting (Do have slightly lower RPM to Boost ratio before that point, result overlay at page 351)

This turbo needs to be able to work internally gated, So reducing the trim on turbine end will probably hurt that. Small trimmed turbine might work ok on smaller SR and Rb20 engines, When you are bored of the SS1PU and ready for a high mount I can trim one for you to your recommendations.

You just need to tell me what housing to supply, as I will be buying the Tial housing soon.

At the moment I was going to buy a .64 suit GT28, but if you want me to get a GT30 spec housing just let me know. Yet the GT30 are 60mm 84 trim, so we might be better off using the .64 GT28 housing anyway so we can profile it up. The GT30 housing would need a sleeve which I am not too confident in doing.

Can you tell me the specs of your highflow turbine? From memory its a 60mm but different to whats in a G3?

Welcome to A Brand new all better and all mightier ATR43G3 turbocharger. The Older 58T version is now retired.
comp.JPG

This turbocharger have out performed the older profile of the G3 in both peek power and response. Both turbochargers had roller bearing cartridges installed.

Thin Yellow and Red (18psi) is the latest G3
Thick Yellow is the older 58T G3

This turbocharger stopped making power at 376rwkws @ 23psi.

atr43g376rwkw.jpg

atr43g3boost.jpg

Congratulations. That new turbos certainly do produces a wide spread curve, making 240rwkws @4000 rpms. It would be a hell lot of fun on road. Great to see the improvement stao. Good work. :thumbsup:

Stao,

Are these results comparable? Ie. your new setup is on an aftermarket highmount manifold and externally gated, did you test the old profile G3 on the same setup or is this new result vs the old stock manifold/internal wastegate result?

Highmount/external by looks, i want to see internal gate 56T vs 58T on stock manifold, thats what most people have/buy..

Also going back to the 56t, originally you where saying the 58t needed cams for more power from memory,

but going back to 56T and still giving samish results, have you actually run out of turbine flow?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...