Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A bit OT but how are you graphing all your logs like that johnny? Neat and easy to digest :)

it's just excel :)

I create pivot tables with filters then create graphs from it

Alrighty, part where everyone gets excited..

Details:

  • Hypergear SS2
  • 45mm Turbosmart External Gate off Housing (thanks scotty_mn35)
  • E85
  • 1.6bar boost, made more power on 1.5bar
  • IAT shot up to 50 degrees, subsequently lost 3 degrees of timing (I take 1 degree off every 5 degrees above 35)
  • Stock motor
  • Stock manifold, stock plenum

Timing Map:

post-22311-0-33751700-1419289160_thumb.png

Dyno Reading at Power Tune:

post-22311-0-75839700-1419289162_thumb.png

Virtual Dyno Reading (Using Log File on the same run at Power Tune):

post-22311-0-72358800-1419289159_thumb.png

  • Like 2

57397206.jpg

That thing must feel like a missile when it's on boost. There is a LOT of phat under that curve.

Alrighty, part where everyone gets excited..

awesome result. just out of curiosity did you try to add timing and lower boost in the top end while on the dyno to try pull IAT's down a bit? if so what happened?

Edited by Blackkers

awesome result. just out of curiosity did you try to add timing and lower boost in the top end while on the dyno to try pull IAT's down a bit? if so what happened?

Car was just at a dyno day at Powertune so I wasn't controlling the runs..

I did tell Chea to run the car with different boost settings, but at 1.6bar it bled down to 1.5bar. Ended up doing 1x run at 1.5 bar and 2x runs at 1.6bar...

I'll upgrade the FMIC and then hire out a dyno and pump more timing through the motor. Adam at Powertune did say my manifold was glowing red by the 2nd run. Signs of high EGTs and/or flow restrictions.. probably won't get round to doing any of what I said till February.. barely have time to do anything with the car these days lol

Johnny,

Your approach is probably wrong. 50°C IAT is nothing. Certainly not enough to be pulling lots of timing out. You really need to listen for knock properly and decide where/when it becomes apparent and make the tune safely away from there in the usual manner that people have always done. When you're pulling timing at those relatively mild IATs, you're causing high(er) EGT.

You're using E85 which will smother the effect of hot air a lot better than 98 will. Gives you so much extra protection that you're probably massively overdoing the engine protection routine by backing off the timing the way you are. If you wanted to be fussy about it you'd be better off pulling boost off it as the IAT goes up.

Problem is with E85 you can't really hear knock.... I do monitor for knock but regardless of timing or boost levels put through the motor the knock readings are pretty similar (mind you it's just a basic knock monitor I'm using with the Adaptronic).

I was always under the impression IATs past 50 degrees Celsius is bad, thus I pull back 3 degrees at that point.

Most of the runs have been with Virtual Dyno used to estimate torque/power gain. I did some logging when I was at Wakefield too with the laptop under the front seat strapped down.

I can't pull boost as IAT increase as the ECU doesn't have that feature and also I use a dedicated EBC which allows for quick changes of settings.

In saying that the tune isn't complete, I haven't hired a dyno to finalise and push the tune further as I was still ironing out some bugs.. hopefully will do that after the new year once the shop I hire the dyno opens back up for business again.

Ok, so I did some quick reading of a few engineering papers and this came up - although it's for a direct injected motor..

Looks like I may be a little too cautious with the whole IAT vs. Timing.

post-22311-0-54748500-1419317197_thumb.png

Just a note 3 day turnaround Maybe??? ,Then 7days to post back WTF??? ,if you go this route make sure you ask for an express post return , don't assume they will post it express unless you ask !! And yes I did call and ask about the turna round time ,etc etc , just sayin so others don't get caught with with a car siting in a work shop

Express option is available to chice from on our site, default is parcel post with insurance. How ever during xmas break delivery time can be unpredictable.

It wasnt Christmas it was last week of November ,I asked if I could check out on line and they said do it COD ,I am just giving a heads up so others don't get caught out .

I have had similar issues with COD it can take Aust post ages. One of my deliveries took a week, sent from the other side of Melbourne. lol.

Not Hypergear's fault. Pay for a courier if you want express delivery.

Yeah COD is often awkward like that. I had waited a while before checking with the post office that said they'd had it for a week... I was never notified. Not hypergear's fault though and the turbo was worth the wait!

  • 2 weeks later...

Hope every one had a lovely new year. :turned:

I've spent a lot of time but haven't had alot of luck with the GTR yet, I've fitted over 20 different combination of turbochargers to it and yet can not get it to reach 20psi any quicker then 4300RPM. Due to the lack of VCT, the head doesn't like boost down low either, result in a violent surge working with smaller turbochargers, Then the only way out is by creating more lag.

How ever I'm narrowing down to a few sets of wheel and housing combinations for the most responsive 400awkws as possible. Will be doing further evaluations with it using adjustable cam gears down the track.

Result sent in by another member that is currently using our 21U high flow running E85 fuel making a super responsive 311rwkws on 20psi internally gated. That is on a R33 Rb25det stock engine.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...