Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We didnt up the boost as the current exhaust is a restriction so more boost currently doesnt = more power. Im really just after more mid range

I wonder what a atr43 g3 sat with a .64 t3 rear would be like on a sr20 then..

Cheers

Darren

There is an custom version made for SR running in .64 rear housing. I'm in the process of engineering an ceramic ball bearing chra to suit an short T2x shaft and bearing housing, which also means all the TD06 can be converted using the same ball bearing assembly to improve throttle response. I'm considering of doing one more round of SR20det development with a stock standard motor, hunting for the right car at current stage also.

Even there is no VCT I should still can engineer an ceramic BB turbo to reach 200rwkws @ 4000RPM that makes over 340rwkws on E85 fuel. Below is result from Jason's 1JZ None VVTI engine running inside a R31 wagon. car made 340rwkws on 23psi externally gated, 200kws @ 4000RPM:

jason340rwkws.jpg

Video taken from last week Calder raceway. Chasing Manuel's yellow R33 GTST, Excellent battle footage of ATR43 G3SAT 1J VS SS2 RB. :thumbsup:

  • Like 2

Yea think i seriously goingnto consider one in the next 6 months looking for that 200 plus at 4k and 350 ish you td06 looks the goods

SS2 or the new G3SAT will do it.. I make about 240kW at 4k and near 7k it's at 370kW

  • Like 1

Aww damn, be interesting how it goes then when I bolt it up. Got it quite cheap. If it doesn't make any decent power then I'll save up again for a different turbo set up from the hyper gear range

Aww damn, be interesting how it goes then when I bolt it up. Got it quite cheap. If it doesn't make any decent power then I'll save up again for a different turbo set up from the hyper gear range

Rear wheel looks like standard size.

Gap between wheel and iwg flap is huge

Rear wheel is defs bigger than standard wheel, look at adms15 rear wheel in his standard turbo against the post I did. Defs a difference.

I have found out who the did the hi flow and as it turns out it's been done by gcg

Rear wheel is defs bigger than standard wheel, look at adms15 rear wheel in his standard turbo against the post I did. Defs a difference.

I have found out who the did the hi flow and as it turns out it's been done by gcg

Let us know how you go

Got the same turbo by the looks of it

What one do you have ? U got a dyno sheet posted up ?

I thought you said you went through the dyno thread and this thread, didn't look hard enough eh? LOL :)

here:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-583#entry7731137

and

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/page-54#entry7731169

Oh yez.. plus a video haha:

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...