Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

We sponsored topstages S14 for wtac this year, its an built sr20det with solid head and pro cams. Upgraded to our ATR43SAT turbocharger from Garrett GT3071. Car made more power through out the whole rev range and maxed at 381rwkws e85 fuel.

14500401_1188416121202317_74590799406876

 

Red: Atr43sat

Green: Gt3071

391rwkw.jpg

Philip island test run:

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, the car had upgraded fuel pump later on so I upsized the turbo to an ATR45SAT which made 408rwkws on an aggressive tune. Backed to 399rwkws for tracks. It run 1.251 at Winston last week beating previous wtac winners result of 1.26

14542310_1188415847869011_41923078897209

14519735_1805987033011106_22834492266191

399rwkw.jpg

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all.
I'm about to order the atr43sat for a 25. Looking to make 450-500rwhp Questions are:
Can that be had internally gated through standard dump?
If I need to change dump etc might as well go ex-gate yeah?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2016/5/16 at 0:42 PM, CEF33Y said:

Speaking of Non VCT, low cr engines, did you ever end up doing any development with an RB20 Tao?

There are so few of them around and took a while to find the right car. Picked up a 93 model R32 GTS4 in good mechanical order. Will be starting developments based on R32 Rb20det engines. My goal is to 270rwkws on pump 98 fuel with good turbo response.

gts4big.jpg

Car is pretty basic with a return flow cooler, and a turbo back exhaust fitted. I will be Nistune it and drop in some ID injectors for starters. I will list prices and places as project move along.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha true, my plain is to drop in a RB25det NEO motor off a Stagea in it later on, Nissan should've done that years ago.

I will be using our ATR43SS1 as well as doing some high flows, and see if there are room for improvements.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be moving to a new ATR45SAT Ball Bearing soon.
Will put results up here once dynoed.
Below is what im going from -> to.

ATR43SS2+ gate off housing - > ATR45SAT BB
Stock ExhaustMani - > D2 Stable High Mount + Gate of mani
44mm Tial Gate - > 50mm Turbosmart Gate
Stock Plenum - > Custom FFP + Sard Fuel Reg
Single 460 Walbro - > Probably Surge tank
Nistune ECU - > Adaptronic ECU +Wideband/Airtemp sensor
Z32 AFM - > MAP inside adaptronic
E85 - > Still E85
Stock Head - > Only doing ARP headbolts
And a bunch of other random stuff

Was ~450 hp at the rears - > Hoping for + 550 hp at the rears

Current full boost is around 3800 @ 20-21 psi
Im hoping for similar response, looks like it will be close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...