Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Straight up convert to top feed, use 1/2 height injectors that are stainless. The Bosch 1150cc (at 4 bar) are unmodified. Just don't use the bottom collar. These injectors are commonly referred to as Seadoo Injectors. At 3bar they're 980cc.

Or get a set of Siemens DEKA V 80lb (~875cc) short stainless injectors and a normal top feed rail. All you need to do is trim the spacers to suit. Will fit snug underneath the stock plenum too and provide you years of endless joy.

  • 2 weeks later...

My personal best was 320rwkws on E85 fuel. This car actually made more power. Looks like its got FFP, cooler and exhaust plus fuel and ecu. It might have cams as the power curve lookes like it has no active vct. 

Are there any results for the ATR45SS on an RB? I'm tossing up between the ATR45 CBB and ATR45SS CBB. Tao what would be the expected difference in lag and power be between the two? Both external gate on a proper manifold on a 30DET.

Hi, Rb30det is different to Rb25det, its heaps more responsive. Both ATR45 and ATR45SS works fine depending on how much power u r chasing for. I've personally used an 700HP ATR45SAT in a 2JZGTE no VVTI, the end result would be very similar to a Rb30det.  Car made 406rwkws @ 20psi on P98 fuel, full boost by by 4000RPM.  So what sort of power r u chasing for and will the car be running on E85 or P98?

Hi Tao,

I should add I have an ATR45 CBB 0.82 on an RB30DET (different car and engine) and have been happy with it so I know what to expect from an ATR45, just curious what the difference would be with the billet compressor. Power goals are 450 give or take 20-30 so I know both turbos are in that ballpark. Will be flex tuned on E85 in a Stagea and keeping VCT.

For 450rwkws ATR45SS-1 with 63mm billet wheel will do. Next size can do 520rwkws+ on E85 they works extremely well with XR6 BA/FA, but would be considerably laggier working with a 3L.

  • Like 1

Based on that would it be fair to expect that the SS-1 would give 20-30kw more than a normal ATR45 at the expense of 2-300rpm response? I'm just trying to figure out how it would compare to my other 30DET.

The ATR45SS-1 I'm pretty happy with and I would run that on Rb25det with a smaller rear end. when tested on the 2JZ, The response is almost identical to the normal ATR45  that made 30kws more. This particular comp wheel works with a normal ATR45 turbine.  

  • 2 weeks later...

Great result to share from Garage 7 tuned Rb25det Neo powered S14 running using one of our TD06SL205 turbochargers. This is an custom built turbo based in a TD06 rear end, externally gated.

Car has: 1000cc Injectors, Link ECU G4+ Storm Flex Fuel and usual supporting mods. 
Peek power made: 308rwkw on 98 and 378rwkw on E85.

Fabrications done by: Vulcan Performance and Fabrication

Dynoed and Tuned by: Garage 7

FFP modifications done by: NDR Fab Precision Race Fabrication

Car owned by: Matt G

fronts.jpg

carondyno.jpg

power.jpg

 

 

Sorry if a bit OT .

I was under the impression that this was a fail on RB25 plenums - or at least R33 spec ones .

Tao I'd like to hear your opinion on this one as I took your advice and fitted your preferred intercooler with a Just Jap over the fan pipe kit . It would be good to use a bend and throttle mounted on the plenum if it can be made to work properly .

Thanks in advance , cheers Adrian .

Plenty have done it and plenty say it's fine.  Many of those engines may have died, and you wouldn't hear about it if the plenum distribution was to blame because then the person who claimed it was fine would have proven themselves wrong.

But....I must stress, I don't know that it's not fine.  I only have very strong suspicion that it's not, because those plenums are not set up to receive air for all 6 cylinders from the front end.  The internal shapes are set up to receive it from the side.  I'm enough of an aerodynamicist to be very leery of that.  And I have never seen anyone report on 6x EGT probe results showing that it is fine.  On that basis, I simply wouldn't do it.  I'd be less worried about the various large plenums that bolt onto the bottom half, because at least they are simply big arse volumes on top of the runners, with no odd internal shapes to interfere.

  • Like 1

Hi, the Car's running 22psi to produce results above. 

With that FFP modifications,  one of my tuners did mention it feeds CYC 5 and 6 more air then the rest causing them to run lean. I don't have personal experiences with them, so I can't comment.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...