Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I noticed the new 7275 and 6875 doesn’t have a T4 divided rear option

only Vband rear and T4 open

 

can anyone see any issue with running a twin scroll T4 divided manifold with twin gates into an open T4 rear ?

13 hours ago, SiR_RB said:

can anyone see any issue with running a twin scroll T4 divided manifold with twin gates into an open T4 rear ?

No, I really can't see an issue with it.   The merge may not be perfect but there are definitely worse ways of doing it - it could arguably work nicer than some 6>1 manifolds out there.

  • Like 2
21 hours ago, Lithium said:

Ha! That is ridiculous, nice work!  That's gotta be one of the more stout RB25 setups out there, being SAU people will probably make dyno comments but realistically - an RB25 with 270deg cams and 40psi pumped through it on E85 is going to make some serious power :)

What is the spool like?  There is no rpm scale on the dyno plot (NFI why people print plots like that), so a bit hard to tell.   Be very interesting to see how it goes at the strip, hope you have a decent trans! :D

 

spools insanely quick. that ramp up is within 1000 RPM. It takes off like a rocket. I roll race so I needed the snappy response.

 

On 7/31/2019 at 1:30 AM, Dale FZ1 said:

What turbine housing size - also single/split pulse + gate setup?

Perhaps drop something into the RB25 dyno results page

Strong result.

single pulse, 44mm wastegate , T4  - 81 AR

11 hours ago, feedmyfast said:

spools insanely quick. that ramp up is within 1000 RPM. It takes off like a rocket. I roll race so I needed the snappy response.

 

single pulse, 44mm wastegate , T4  - 81 AR

Would love to compare it to my rb25 6062 setup in terms of response.  

QLD or Syd roll racing?

 

Also curious on what headstuds youre using? 

Edited by r33ryan
  • 5 weeks later...

I've just found out that the "7675" I thought I had was actually a 7175 rated to 985hp. Explains why it was so responsive and why my IATs were so high on high boost ? 

The 7275 Gen 2 should be a pretty stout turbo considering its rated at 1200hp and biggest housing offered is a .96 which should mean it will possibly spool a bit quicker than my 1.12 7175?

Mine started to max out low 30s so im not sure how well matched the compressor is to the turbine but the newer wheel might make it better.

I've now upgraded to a 7685 so we'll see how that goes. Will report back once shes up and running again.

  • Thanks 1
3 minutes ago, klutched said:

I've just found out that the "7675" I thought I had was actually a 7175 rated to 985hp. Explains why it was so responsive and why my IATs were so high on high boost ? 

The 7275 Gen 2 should be a pretty stout turbo considering its rated at 1200hp and biggest housing offered is a .96 which should mean it will possibly spool a bit quicker than my 1.12 7175?

Mine started to max out low 30s so im not sure how well matched the compressor is to the turbine but the newer wheel might make it better.

I've now upgraded to a 7685 so we'll see how that goes. Will report back once shes up and running again.

What did you make with the "7675" again?

14 hours ago, SiR_RB said:

Anyone got any results from the newish 7275 or 6875 turbos yet?

 

or do I have to be a first and report how it goes lol

I get the feeling you’re going to be the guinea pig  

  • Haha 1
  • 7 months later...

Good afternoon Volks,
please let me grab out this old topic and try to get some experienced answers from your side for my little problem i got.
Engine is a Stock RB26 with metal head gasket and stuff (stock bottom end) except HKS 272 degrees camshafts and on that is sitting a PT 6466 CEA Gen2 TwinScroll with a VBand 0.82 A/R outlet (1 Wastegate).

In sum, im actually pretty unhappy with the spool and the driving style. I've got at around 612 HP @18 PSI but the spool at ca. 5,5K rpm is horrible for street drives. The car runs on petrol with 100 octan (E85 is not possible here, no gas stations available hard to organize etc.).

The problem i got is the bad spool and responsivness of the car. It is generally driven on the streets and in the hills, where i need a fast spool and good power band more than everything else and after driving in corners, with this kind of spool, it's feeling like that you shift everytime in a big nowhere.

Now i want to come back to my question. Im thinking about a setup change/switch but im not pretty sure, which is maybe the best solution and therefore I want to please you with some experiences.
The first option would be to get another Single from Precision which may fits on the actual Manifold etc. or go back to like Twin Setup  HKS GT-SS with a good spool but than, i have to change from the single setup (manifold etc.) to the twin.

Are there people here which may have experiences with a PT 5862 or a PT 5858 on 100 Octans for this application? I see some dyno sheets here but the most were done on E85, which is not comparable to the 100octans. I think that it's maybe also possible to just switch the turbo, until the Stroker is done and the head ported. But im still struggling, if this brings the final aim, that i have with the responsivness

The Aim is to get >600 horses at the engine on 100 octans, but the most important is a good responsivness with a good power band.

Friends of mine are driving those 2860-5 and HKS GT-SS Turbos in their r32 gtr's, on the same base and compared to their quick spool, they are completely different cars, but in the street and for some open time track days, it makes even more fun to drive with them.

If there's someone who can help, it would be great.

Thank you guys and stay safe

Edited by meX

A .82 rear housing is an open scroll turbine housing you need the .84 twin scroll one on a twin scroll manifold. i have a 6466 .84ts on my stock bottom end 2.6 and mine is all in at 4,100rpm

  • Like 2

My first suggestion would be to tone down the cams. Even to stock cams or some custom cams with less overlap but higher than stock lift (with some adjustable gears to get the optimum settings). So far as I can see aggressive cams are for engines operated principally at high revs...drag cars or circuit racers with a close ratio box.

Secondly  to convince you that going back to twins would be a retrograde step have a look at this video - it is definitely worth a watch: :http://www.goodezilla.com/rb26dett-skyline-gtr-single-turbo-vs-twin-turbo

Regarding turbo choice I have no advice for you - my experience runs only to an old school GT3540R. It could be that your turbo could be adapted but I will leave it to those with better knowledge than I have.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...