Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol @ 200sx Jonoe posted...equivalent R33 GTS-T would be like 7/8k. Though that one does seem overpriced for the mileage. Face it Astro, nothing gonna beat a Skyline for the dollar value. In your position I'd consider a Rex though.

lol what happened to mr keen for fourteen with a RWC...

Taking it in for a check on Monday.

Probably a tyre kicker but meh, I'd be happy if I got less than that

lol @ 200sx Jonoe posted...equivalent R33 GTS-T would be like 7/8k. Though that one does seem overpriced for the mileage. Face it Astro, nothing gonna beat a Skyline for the dollar value. In your position I'd consider a Rex though.

Its expensive cause its manual.

Same spec/year in same condition (even lower k's) auto is like 8-9k.

lol @ you both

What you need to understand is that the worlds decisions and choices arent driven by Engineers.

Marketting/Finance/Shareholders set unrealistic demands with fk all money and expect the world.

Wont make this a tl;dr but have a think; What gets more money? Redesigning the powersteering system or adding iPod connectivity? You can sell a lot more cars advertising iPod connectivity than mentioning redesigned brake master cylinder.

If it was Engineers final decision, everything would be designed & built correctly, but unfortunately world is driven by money and the yuppies who pass through a finance diploma make all the calls.

The engineers are squarely to blame. It was pathetically designed, without cause for the conditions.

There is no one else to blame unless someone can produce a paper where by the engineers explicitly state this is a high risk in the documentation of the project.

Regardless of any Shareholders or Finance, which is a stupid point given the wheel has now cost FAR MORE than

1. It should have

2. Lost public confidence

3. Cost ING a lot more money in the entire docklands precinct.

As IF the commissioning of the wheel came down to S/H & F. :rolleyes:

don't start getting technical kunts just admit that we are behind Japan/America tech wise not just cars just in general

Manufacturing wise - yes. Tech wise not really. There is some pretty serious gear (industry) that gets designed here for Mining, Agriculture. Whilst not an iPhone - it's tech none the less.

Look @ the 'tech' coming out of Taiwan, Thailand & similar with regards to electronics. They don't "have" the tech, they have foundries that make it. The tech to create/produce at that level is there as well which is far above the design of something that uses that process for without it you'd have nothing.

This is where Australia is losing and will continue to do so under the Carbon Tax, mark my words - manufacturing in Aus is already dropping and it'll disappear once everything is in full swing.

Aussie roads & conditions are certainly not part and parcel of many places in the world as well.

The local car market is very good. Hate them as i might, Holdens & Fords - you get a LOT more for you money these days than you did 10 years ago when purchasing a car.

That's with rising costs, inflation & base material costs.

If anything it's a testament to how well it's been done.

I'd suspect Europe is the forefront of engineering if your talking exclsivley cars the luxo brands (love them or hate them) lead the tech race IMO.

Id love to see Hyundai create something like the veyron

As for ford and holden they are great cars but everyone has to have the badge value these days, forget the strain the cost of keeping up appearances puts as long as we got a flashier (base model BMW) car than shaz & Daz next door it's all swoit

I'd argue that, depending what kind of tech - R35 owns the track, the Ferrari looks and sounds better. The C63 is safer.

Any manufacturer could create their own Veyron if it was in their interests to do it...there's just no point to making a flagship concept when Hyundai don't sell sports/luxury cars. They make small and medium family cars on a budget and do that job better than Bugatti, hence there's a lot of them on the road. Bugatti could compete...no point to it.

Engineers build supercars in their backyards, just look at the land speed record holders at the salt flats in the states...all private teams. The difference between manufacturers with regard to technology, is in having the market or R&D backing to do it, not necessarily the intelligence of their engineers, who are given orders and constraints - though where I concede is that the brightest will usually be the highest paid and employed by the wealthiest of manufacturers.

In the end there's only so much you can put in a car and that's why Aus is catching up / has caught up, on a dollar for dollar vehicle comparison.

The engineers are squarely to blame. It was pathetically designed, without cause for the conditions.

There is no one else to blame unless someone can produce a paper where by the engineers explicitly state this is a high risk in the documentation of the project.

Regardless of any Shareholders or Finance, which is a stupid point given the wheel has now cost FAR MORE than

1. It should have

2. Lost public confidence

3. Cost ING a lot more money in the entire docklands precinct.

As IF the commissioning of the wheel came down to S/H & F. :rolleyes:

With any capital project, a budget is determined based on the payback period. Any capital spending must be repayed in X years for the project to be viable to go ahead. The easiest way to get more capital is to promise shorter payback period to your shareholders/finance department.

So the project managers goal is to have the lowest cost of build so the payback period is shorter and that finance/shareholders/directors are willing to invest.

So what's the best way to do this? Substitute Material A for Material B etc until the construction cost falls within your X years payback period.

The engineering department would build/design to whatever budget is given to them however it's their responsibility to flag any risks. It's up to the project manager/directors to accept this risk.

The difference between Australia and the rest of the world is company's culture in payback period. For example, Germany would have a payback period twice as long as Australia which means more initial capital investment.

Engineers dont build Ferris wheels just because they want to Ash lol. It's all about the payback for the business.

tl;dr

Sorry Pat,

Would have to disagree with you here.

I find it highly unlikely that the engineers built the ferris wheel knowing the risks and that it was due solely to budget. If they knew theithere was a risk in it failing upon being built, I would say that they would have abandoned the project or asked for additional funding.

Moreso that they just stuffed up.

Also their are alot more factors to determine if a project is viable other than payback period. I.e NPV,IRR,and other economic factors such as cash flows, good will and additional interested attracted to the area.

Yes. Just beat my PB at the Island from April by .5 of a second after being set back by a traumatic crash in October. In an exhausted state as well!

Now down to 1:46.3 oooooooh rah! Only ten more seconds to go :D

power fc people:

Can you store more than one tune, if so, can you pick between them using a hand controller?? tell me someone

From what I know, you can't store more than one map in the ECU, I think Hamish carry laptop containing both 98 oct and E85 tune and transfering via PFC datalogit.

I'm sure Hamish will correct me if I'm wrong.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...