Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dat Coles casual rate

my gfs sister gets a higher hourly rate as safeway deli/bakery (38hr week) vs gf as microbiologist for food/drug testing company (40hr week)

(though it is shit pay and looking for new job. $8 an hour pay cut for going from casual rate to full time)

Additional benefits though, which you don't get when you've got boosted pay from Casual Loading

of course, but a 28% paycut is pretty harsh...

also: got job, already had 2 week overseas trip booked, told them upfront. offered to take leave without pay (because only been working there 2-3 months), doesnt fill in leave form because company doesnt have any documents, comes back from holiday and company used up leave till it was well into the negatives. is that legal? i find it very strange an established small business doesnt have standard forms so company can almost do what they want with these things.

25% Casual Loading is the standard rate.

Unlike Casual, Full time gets 30 paid days off per year (4 weeks annual leave + 10 days sick/carers leave)

So although the casual hourly rate is higher, with Full Time you also get given money for not working... so it does come close to evening itself out...

(52 x 5) = 260
(52 x 5) - 30 = 230 = works 12% less days, effectively raising the Full Time "hourly rate" by 12%

I don't think it's too big of a pay difference, considering job security, dismissal protection, etc etc

I don't think it's too big of a pay difference, considering job security, dismissal protection, etc etc

dis is true...

hmm will remind her tonight. thanks bro

(odie, the new relationship counselor)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...