Jump to content
SAU Community

Circuit Semi Slicks


Roy

Recommended Posts

Sorry, the older cars used to use 24/64-18 front 27/68-18

Looks like the newer cars went up some sizes. 27/65-18 and 31/71-18

Used tyres aren't that hard to come by, google will show a few leads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, the older cars used to use 24/64-18 front 27/68-18

Looks like the newer cars went up some sizes. 27/65-18 and 31/71-18

Used tyres aren't that hard to come by, google will show a few leads.

as will my105.com.au

http://www.my105.com/ListingDetails/tabid/65/p/1/cid/5478/id/12962/Default.aspx

http://www.my105.com/ListingDetails/tabid/65/p/1/cid/5478/id/12958/Default.aspx

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep, I bought a set of Kumho S700 because they were cheaper than semis at the time. Had 2 front blowouts in 3 track days, one left one right. And the third one I got to replace the first blowout, was smoking and about to let go when I had the 2nd blowout!

That was on a 180SX with unchanged front suspension setup that R888s and FZ201s, and even cheapo gemstone street tyres survived for years without any issue.

I wouldn't touch Kumhos again after that experience. And Kumho simply didn't want to know about it.

Edited by hrd-hr30
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have three sets of Kumho V70A's and I have been very impressed with them after coming from Yokohama 048's.

The Kumho's have a reputation for failures on the front if you run them too soft or with too much camber.

I had to go up about 6 pounds from the 048 hot pressures and I only run 2 degrees negative camber in the front.

It could be the fact that they have square shoulders and like to sit flat on the road but they seem to react badly to camber. The 048's have very rounded shoulders by comparison and cope with a lot more camber without any problems. The Kumho's also like higher pressures that seem more like street radial pressures than semi slick pressures.

I am happy with the performance of my Kumho semi's but you have to adjust your pressures and suspension to make them work. They are not as forgiving as other tyres on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird.

I have the v70a/v700 ( arnt they the same?) in hard compound running on the supra, so a fairly heavy car. I havent had issue's with them and ive had them since start of the year, had 2 track days and 5 hill climbs so far.

I also ran them 34/32 hot for track days and even tried them at 32-30 hot on hill climbs, no issues for me.

I like them but would go mediums as the hard compounds take too long to heat up for hill climbs.

I hear very good things about the 050 yokohama's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird.

I have the v70a/v700 ( arnt they the same?)

no the V700 and V70A are different types/patterns of semi slicks. But he was asking about slicks - i assume the V700 was a typo - the Kumho slick is S700. Which are obviously a different tyre from either of the semis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird.

I have the v70a/v700 ( arnt they the same?) in hard compound running on the supra, so a fairly heavy car. I havent had issue's with them and ive had them since start of the year, had 2 track days and 5 hill climbs so far.

I also ran them 34/32 hot for track days and even tried them at 32-30 hot on hill climbs, no issues for me.

I like them but would go mediums as the hard compounds take too long to heat up for hill climbs.

I hear very good things about the 050 yokohama's

The 50's are quick but dont last very long. They also fall away in performance - not the compound - just the rubber wearing differently across the tread face. May be fixable by remounting the rhf on the lhf as they are directional. They go well from cold too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's opposite of what the IPRA guys were saying when the 050's came out. Compared to the 048's, which heat cycle badly, they reckon the 050's were good till they were at the canvas, hence better value for money as you can use them till they wear out and not lose performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that is why I was trying to say it isnt a compound thing. Just maybe that my lardbox is a little to, umm, lardie for them.

Am sure someone will be along to tell me my set up sucks teh balls but here is a dead tyre.

post-5134-0-13378100-1403246995_thumb.jpg

Not how the tread block (for want of a better term) wears - chamfers really. Can be helped by swapping tyres side to side but the grip does fall away as the tyre ages. For me anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What pressures were/are you running?

Mine chamfered as well when I first put them on, a little more camber and less tyre pressure seemed to help a fair bit.

How do you rate them against the V70A for wear and grip?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What pressures were/are you running?

Mine chamfered as well when I first put them on, a little more camber and less tyre pressure seemed to help a fair bit.

How do you rate them against the V70A for wear and grip?

1. Pressures were 30# which is what the bloke from Yokohama said.

2. Camber is enough I think - anymore I would have to wheel align it for other circuits/events etc. Dont think it is that far away. Did a 64.0 something which isnt too bad for 410 horsepowers, a full interior and a talentless driver.

3. NFI never ran with the ho's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah 30 hot is spot on although I think I'm running plenty more camber than you, I'm up to around 4deg now.

Thinking about giving the Kumhos a crack next, I've got the 123S down into the 63's and the A050 a mid 61.

Have a set of Ikeya Formula front LCA's to also fit so hopefully the extra track that gives will help times a little because GTR understeer is a bitch

Edited by SimonR32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...