Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Here is the E65 Dyno run ,looking good

E65 Scott.JPG

I have put this in my thread but it might be of interest to those of you that understand, me ?

Just to add something the Tuner said.

I would not read into the dyno response figures at low RPM too much as I had to run at a much higher ramp rate that I would like due to the torque splitting playing havoc on the dyno.  This is very common for GTR’s on dynos when the power output is very high.  The best comparison is to see how long it takes to reach x boost from x boost.  Not just RPM.  I can literally put the foot down and have boost on demand in your car with this turbo.  It is very sharp.

4 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

I have put this in my thread but it might be of interest to those of you that understand, me ?

Just to add something the Tuner said.

I would not read into the dyno response figures at low RPM too much as I had to run at a much higher ramp rate that I would like due to the torque splitting playing havoc on the dyno.  This is very common for GTR’s on dynos when the power output is very high.  The best comparison is to see how long it takes to reach x boost from x boost.  Not just RPM.  I can literally put the foot down and have boost on demand in your car with this turbo.  It is very sharp.

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

2 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

I would assume that's because it is tuned to turbine wheel speed and tapering off boost to keep it under the threshold.

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

Can't remember what has been said in here, but the boost peaks and then rolls off - not because the turbo had nothing else in it, but because the brief was more about low down/midrange and reliability as opposed to give it all she's got capn' - as far as I know.    This is definitely not maxed out at any point of the rev range, and I'd say if it had a flat boost curve it'd look less like it rolls over.

Pretty sure it's only around 20psi at peak rpm.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
16 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

I actually believe it was 24 or 25psi tapering off to 20 to keep turbo speeds at 120000rpm. 

yes, 25 to 20 on the E65 runs I think. I asked to day for a graph with the psi details ?

20 on the pump I think , maybe 21

17 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Short test run today , looks pretty good.

As you can see, just starts going at 3K and keeps going

8374 first run after tune.mp4

Looks good, mate!   In 2nd gear it looks like it's got GOOD boost by 3500rpm without trying too hard, and picks up hard when shifting in the 6000rpm range.  

Just running under 3k from to have a look at it and went better from idle in 1st as well, the idle is now 900rpm , not 1200 and hunting :)

I thought it looked pretty tough over 3k , very linear as well.

2 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Just running under 3k from to have a look at it and went better from idle in 1st as well, the idle is now 900rpm , not 1200 and hunting :)

I thought it looked pretty tough over 3k , very linear as well.

Wheels  are you entering a tractor pull contest? 

On 4/5/2017 at 10:20 PM, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Short test run today , looks pretty good.

As you can see, just starts going at 3K and keeps going :)

8374 first run after tune.mp4

Really nice. What are the specs on the engine (I totally forgot).

2 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

Really nice. What are the specs on the engine (I totally forgot).

3.2 Nitto Stroker

HKS Vcam step 2   with UE 260  10.85 Exhaust

EFR8374 , 4" dump into 3 1/2 to tail

8:5 CR

And all the stuff to make it all work together .

I will be giving it my first runaround noon today :)

 

  • Like 1

Had a quick run when the car was dropped off yesterday and could feel the difference without smashing it hard.

I went for a run early this morning and it is a different machine to drive , first I gave it some up to from idle 7500 and it felt like it was hard all the way after 3200 and got there pretty quickly from idle, felt great.

Then I did some changes at 5000rpm and it was on boost through 1,2,3,4 and 5th had to stop

Next I did the same at 4000rpm 1,2,3 and 4th to see what happen, it was just about ready to fly in another 300rpm ish from each change, mad!

You can dive it anywhere in 6th gear in a 60 , 80 or 100kph zone without changing back on any hill , the only time I had to change was on the 35kph bends going up to a step incline , that torque is just so good in a street car , especially if you want to relax a bit

I would say it is very close to 900rpm better while driving it in any gear if you want to get it going. it really starts to get going at 3000 and hard just after that :wub:

From my experience , in my car it smashed the 6266 everywhere as a driving experience.

Happy camper, you bet , it is a great car to drive at any speed and just feels alive everywhere

  • Like 5

That is mega impressive, Not necessarily too surprising but still awesome that it is performing like that and it sounds like something that finally gives you the GTR experience you had been looking for.  Long expensive and frustrating journey at times but finally there!

 

Congrats on building a beast, hope there are many fun drives on The horizon with the new found power, response and general road manners:)    cheers for the update, too!

  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, Lithium said:

That is mega impressive, Not necessarily too surprising but still awesome that it is performing like that and it sounds like something that finally gives you the GTR experience you had been looking for.  Long expensive and frustrating journey at times but finally there!

 

Congrats on building a beast, hope there are many fun drives on The horizon with the new found power, response and general road manners:)    cheers for the update, too!

Thanks mate, it has been a while but I finally got the car going how I wanted it to go and its a fun ride

  • Like 1
53 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

Makes me excited to get mine.

Soon hopefully :(

You will love it :wub:

Paul and Mick could explain it better in car bloke talk, they had 25klm each down a nice bit of driving road, well except for the pot holes , lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...