Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R32 4 door to 2 Door conversion?

Experts,

This thread is about a project overseas, not in AUSTRALIA.

I was wondering whether it is possible to convert R32 4 door sedan gts4 to a R32 GTR? (NOT in AUSTRALIA)

If so, how complex will the chassis mods be?

The reason for thinking of this project is, it is not legal in Bangladesh to import any cars over 5 years of age. Hence a R32 can no longer be imported. Only solution is HALF CUT imports. Therefore, I was wondering if we can use the parts from the HALF CUT for a GTR conversion? Moreover, wanted to know whether Sedan to Coupe conversion is also possible? Or does it have to stay 4 door?

Thanks in Advance!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/467737-r32-4-door-to-2-door-conversion/
Share on other sites

The main problem I see is that the coupe door is wider and therefore the pillar needs to be relocated. Secondly unless the job is done to a very high standard you could end up with a death trap in case of an accident. And I have no idea what the regulatory regime is like in Bangladesh. Four door R32s can look cool.

1 hour ago, MarvinsR33 said:

The dumbest thread I've read so far.

Dude, wtf just buy a 2 door GTR32.

This is S(AU) for a reason

You're an idiot

 

 

Op

I doubt it is financially viable

But yes it is possible given enough skill and money.

No reason you couldn't just drop an rb26 in the bay and upgrade the brakes etc and make yourself a 4 door GTR

 

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, MarvinsR33 said:

The dumbest thread I've read so far.

Dude, wtf just buy a 2 door GTR32.

This is S(AU) for a reason

Mate, that's quite uncalled for, if you actually spend 30 seconds and read the post, he can't import a 32 GTR as the countries laws don't allow it and he obviously has access to a 4 door 32 that's all ready in the country. Unless you have something constructive to say, don't say anything at all.

 

OP

It would be possible to do, but the engineering required to do it and also the money would make it probably not worth while, it would need to be dead straight and chances are it would never drive and handle correctly.

I think @zebra is onto the right idea, get yourself a half cut and convert the running gear and front end of your 4 door over to a GTR, you will be able to pick up the rest of the various goodies along the way to bring the interior and rear up to spec. i like the idea of a 4 door 32 GTR

Edited by Coullsy
Fixing spelling errors
  • Like 3

@Coullsy, @KiwiRS4T, @zebra Thanks heeps. I was thinking along a 4 door 'GTR' conversion all this while. Just wanted to get more info from you guys!

@MarvinsR33 dude I have a 94 R32 GTR in AUS. Like I mentioned in the thread, it is not possible to import these into Bangladesh.

This comprehensive R34 sedan to GT-R conversion will give you an idea of the effort required, it's pretty insane:

http://www.carscoops.com/2016/09/nissan-skyline-r34-gt-r-gets-4-door.html

nissan-r34-4door-conversion-3.jpg

13 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

The main problem I see is that the coupe door is wider and therefore the pillar needs to be relocated. Secondly unless the job is done to a very high standard you could end up with a death trap in case of an accident. And I have no idea what the regulatory regime is like in Bangladesh. Four door R32s can look cool.

The pillar is just one problem. AFAIK:

  • Front window rake and glass is different
  • Rear window rake and glass is different
  • Floor pan is different
  • Door cards are different (obviously)
  • Rear interior, seats and parcel shelf are different
  • The boot, in fact the whole rear end (including tail lights) is different (see photos on above page)
  • Exhaust system is different

etc. etc.

It's totally not worth it.

However, what IS worth it is a sedan with GT-R running gear. A much cheaper proposition too - do it!

Not sure if it's option or just stupid.. but put the 4door neck together but weld the doors and make it flush to make the appearance of a 2 door?

I know it happens with other cars in Indonesia. Not sure if it'll look funny though.

Just an idea :)

If You're happy with the 4 doors then it'll only be possible with an accompanying SAU build thread. :)

Hey@marvinsR33 keep that crap out of this site please mate. Not interested in reading that drivel.

@V28VX37thanks heeps mate!

I will definitely go ahead with a 4-door build. When I do, will definitely start a thread to seek help from you lot. Unfortunately won't be very soon as I just moved to AUS.

Thanks everyone for your knowledge.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...