Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

300 Plus from RB25 for street

Hi all , I'm starting this thread to keep the Hypergear one for Taos Turbos and development .

Ok well many streeters start out looking for 300 + RWKW and with a fairly typical bolt on build often get to the upper 200s and hit a power wall . As Tao said with the wrong combination of bits in pipes , exhausts and inlet tracts , getting beyond 280 odd can be difficult . Bigger turbos and big wastegates don't often help because they aren't the limiting factor .

People understandably try to keep their engine bays stealthy to avoid defects at the roadside lids up debacle . This is where the return flow intercoolers seem good because there doesn't have to be aftermarket pipework . Just recently there have been pics of engine bays with standard looking pipes and claims of 3-400 RWKW . I'm not sure how that works but I'd like to know . Also Tony posted pics of his GTt with the air dam off and a conventional FMIC but with a 90 deg bend and a return tube behind the IC . That tube looks very low BTW , and I'm curious to know what sort of power you made on which fuel .

I have the Blitz return flow and my last run on the rollers got a whole 268 on PULP . The previous run a few years back got me 271 but that was with E70 and a HKS GTRS turbo - on its knees . Between tunes I went to the 3076R IDs and a better fuel pump , plus flicked the Jap exhaust for a custom made one with straight through 3" mufflers . Front and cat are 3.5" but I'm beginning to think the 200 cell core was a bad idea so looking at a 100 cell version . Anyone have any idea how much of a real world difference this makes ?

Back to Intercoolers . There's a few variations on the cold side pipe and I prefer the one that joins to the standard crossover pipe and lets you keep the std recirc valve . The one with the U bend over the cam covers is set up for aftermarket fart valves which don't interest me at all . If I could find a way to return the flow from a crossflow IC that would be good but I'm a bit concerned about the return pipe being too low .

ATM I'm hoping a 100 cell cat and the PWR 300/600/81 IC will get me past 300 wheel wasps with the 3076R on ~ 17 pounds of boost . And on 98 PULP .

Maybe better turbos can come later but the groundwork needs to happen first .   

Any feedback would be good in the exhaust and intercooler/pipework areas , particularly with integrally wastegated builds .

Thanks in advance cheers A . 

  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/468914-300-plus-from-rb25-for-street/
Share on other sites

Just now, discopotato03 said:

I'm beginning to think the 200 cell core was a bad idea so looking at a 100 cell version . Anyone have any idea how much of a real world difference this makes ?

yes I did notice a difference going from a magnaflow 200 metal cat to a 100 cell Venom, in a 5in?  (been a long time since I had any reason to recall)  body, and I'm nowhere near the power level you are so it should help.

Not sure of the emissions legality of it though. Just hoping to plead ignorance "but I have a cat fitted" if it ever comes to that, rather than going decat pipe (which in my experience on my old car, make a huuuuuge difference that can't be beat, no matter how many articles on it Hot 4's etc publish, claiming otherwise.)

I'd like to see peoples IC setups.  Specifically for a Stag, but in reality R34s will be similar.  

My cooler tapped out at 235kw.  I cannot, for the life of me, decide what to do to replace it.  i do not want to cut any sheet metal.  Reo is fine (in fact already cut thanks to a meeting with Skippy).

Ideas?

Preferably not one one the mega dollar Nismo/PWR type arrangements.  Something somewhat affordable.

 

 

 

Last century, yes, last century, I had my intercooler custom built, because it wasn't possible to get anything other than $1500 Jap cores back then.  Return flow.  Driver's side end tank has outlet on the top end of the tank, return pipe hides behind the bumper reo.  The entire core is down in the R32 GTR bar opening.  Admittedly, I haven't pushed this one (my car's never been over 200rwkW), but as I posted in previous discussion in Tao's thread, I refuse to believe that it is not possible to design an end tank that flows out the top properly.

Adrian, apparently it is not that hard to get the return pipe from a straight through FMIC in next to the radiator.  Then you you use a FFP or the over the fan pipe path.  If you want to use standard pipe route inside the engine bay, then you have no option but to go return flow like mine or like Tony's where it hangs down in the weeds behind the front lip.  That low position is why I did mine the way I did.

11 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

 

ATM I'm hoping a 100 cell cat and the PWR 300/600/81 IC will get me past 300 wheel wasps with the 3076R on ~ 17 pounds of boost . And on 98 PULP.

  

Have you lost the love for ethanol?

If it's 300 you want, just change fuel type and tune.  You "may" even do it on 17psi but IMO not "that" likely.  Give it 21psi and ride the wave, to whatever number that makes.

That smaller 52T compressor is likely to be a limiting factor (mass flow capabilities) to hit 300 or much beyond.

Lower restriction in the cat + fewer bends in all pipework always pays dividends - compare open discharge capacity for an agricultural water pump vs one that's working against a head.

Did you ever update the thread on your 3076 turbo upgrade?

 

I too am stuck at high 200's (275rwkw at last count, virtually identical to your result) but I thought I'd share my Trust turnflow setup as it's fairly rare:

14013895863_db037ff39b_z.jpg

I'm not sure what's the current limiting factor in my setup but at one point changing the cat picked up almost 20rwkw.

Also, a question: Why do you want 300rwkw? In practical terms there's very little difference between ~270 and ~300 rwkw, and in fact I would pick the lower number any day if it's more responsive than the higher powered setup.

(I've just killed my bottom end too, so even at my lowly power level these things aren't bullet proof...)

  • Like 1

I too am 'stuck' at high 200's (I don't really care!) But contributing nonetheless.

289rwkw at 20 psi

- bone stock motor, manifolds

- 3076 .82 with 45mm ext gate on turbine housing

- 3" exhaust (proper 3") no cat, one cannon muff. Wastegate plumbed in

- Fenix FMIC (non return flow)

- no emissions gear

- 1000cc injectors

- e85

Im happy with it, but, like others im not sure what (if anything) is limiting the setup.

12 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

Also Tony posted pics of his GTt with the air dam off and a conventional FMIC but with a 90 deg bend and a return tube behind the IC . That tube looks very low BTW , and I'm curious to know what sort of power you made on which fuel .

With a ATR45 internal wastegate, 3 inch JJR dump stock cat decatted, stock airbox and snorkel.

I think 22 psi bleading down to 19psi

About 320rwkw 98 and 355rwkw on e85 roller dyno

380rwkw e85 on hub dyno.

 

In the coming weeks ill be changing to this style setup:

 

15424433_1150342218352309_2033390490_n.j

Just want to clean up the piping and run a 4inch POD in an enclosed box with upper and lower intakes like this:

Less piping parts for me means less chances of piping coming off at the track which seems to happen a bit even with a bunch a norma constant tension clamps. Any extra power or transient response gained will just be a bonus. It was noted at racepace that i should fix my current cooler pipe and airbox setup. FYI on Trent's dyno there was a 10rwkw loss with the arbox lid off.

 

16357571_1567775363236817_1633389695_o.p

 

  • Like 1

Laughs , no didn't lose the moonshine love but did get tired of really pathetic consumption which eventually turned out to be worn exhaust valve guides and not very hi tech side feed injectors . Changed to a Plasmaman rail with shorty ID750s , and better reg , and had the head off for a freshen up . Couldn't work out why it idled badly but occasionally seemed to fix itself . Leak down test sed do something about it because valves sometimes lined up - and sometimes didn't ...

Last tune was on PULP because I got tired of having to store fuel and splash blend . I think you really need a brain box that has knock control to safely do flex fuel . I don't think you can get close enough to the detonation threshold on PULP safely . 

Also a challenge to get 300 or so on commonly available pump fuel , pulp makes you work harder to get everything flowing nicely because you end up knock limited if you don't . The tuner had very conservative timing in this thing and it really kills low boost torque / throttle response / consumption .I fixed that but I don't want to kill an engine doing higher load road tuning with no knock sensing . The right setup E70/85 would possibly get an easy 340-350 wheel wasps .

I can't remember the exact capacity of the 52 and 56 trim 76Rs I think approximately 47 and 50 lb/min , either should be easily good enough if everything flows properly . That poor little GTRS originally went from 17 to 14 pounds of boost so the ethanol is a valid cheat but it's because things can get restrictive/hot without necessarily lethal detonation . You can use some pretty crazy tuning numbers with E70/85 and not burn anything short term , not so with dino juice and a 168k old standard bottom end . I'd like to be able to use most/all of the 52T 76Rs capacity and to get it there the exhaust has to have low restriction and the intercooler have minimum restriction . I agree that E70 and this dryer would have done better but I want things working properly particularly the intercooler . Tao's shown what doesn't work and it would be good for the current and future Skyline fans to get what they want from a known path . The Silver Ghost is 20 years old now and I want to remember getting what I wanted out of it afterwards .

A .  

29 minutes ago, Yeedogga said:

I too am 'stuck' at high 200's (I don't really care!) But contributing nonetheless.

289rwkw at 20 psi

- bone stock motor, manifolds

- 3076 .82 with 45mm ext gate on turbine housing

- 3" exhaust (proper 3") no cat, one cannon muff. Wastegate plumbed in

- Fenix FMIC (non return flow)

- no emissions gear

- 1000cc injectors

- e85

Im happy with it, but, like others im not sure what (if anything) is limiting the setup.

more boost

  • Like 1

Tony I also like the pipework in the yellow car but that's not going to clear the airbox snorkel like with the black car , I do like that airbox BTW .

I have the basic Turbosmart reg on the front of my fuel rail so need a bit more space if the cold pipe goes up over that . It could still do a 90 into the cast crossover pipe and clear the airbox and snorkel , probably means custom stainless tubing .

A .  

11 minutes ago, discopotato03 said:

Tony I also like the pipework in the yellow car but that's not going to clear the airbox snorkel like with the black car , I do like that airbox BTW .

I have the basic Turbosmart reg on the front of my fuel rail so need a bit more space if the cold pipe goes up over that . It could still do a 90 into the cast crossover pipe and clear the airbox and snorkel , probably means custom stainless tubing .

A .  

This is the other option. I think plasmaman sell the piping kit for it:

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

https://plazmaman.com/shop_itemdetail.php?itemid=153&cate=73

 

 

Laughs , no didn't lose the moonshine love but did get tired of really pathetic consumption which eventually turned out to be worn exhaust valve guides and not very hi tech side feed injectors . Changed to a Plasmaman rail with shorty ID750s , and better reg , and had the head off for a freshen up . Couldn't work out why it idled badly but occasionally seemed to fix itself . Leak down test sed do something about it because valves sometimes lined up - and sometimes didn't ...

Last tune was on PULP because I got tired of having to store fuel and splash blend . I think you really need a brain box that has knock control to safely do flex fuel . I don't think you can get close enough to the detonation threshold on PULP safely . 

Also a challenge to get 300 or so on commonly available pump fuel , pulp makes you work harder to get everything flowing nicely because you end up knock limited if you don't . The tuner had very conservative timing in this thing and it really kills low boost torque / throttle response / consumption .I fixed that but I don't want to kill an engine doing higher load road tuning with no knock sensing . The right setup E70/85 would possibly get an easy 340-350 wheel wasps .

I can't remember the exact capacity of the 52 and 56 trim 76Rs I think approximately 47 and 50 lb/min , either should be easily good enough if everything flows properly . That poor little GTRS originally went from 17 to 14 pounds of boost so the ethanol is a valid cheat but it's because things can get restrictive/hot without necessarily lethal detonation . You can use some pretty crazy tuning numbers with E70/85 and not burn anything short term , not so with dino juice and a 168k old standard bottom end . I'd like to be able to use most/all of the 52T 76Rs capacity and to get it there the exhaust has to have low restriction and the intercooler have minimum restriction . I agree that E70 and this dryer would have done better but I want things working properly particularly the intercooler . Tao's shown what doesn't work and it would be good for the current and future Skyline fans to get what they want from a known path . The Silver Ghost is 20 years old now and I want to remember getting what I wanted out of it afterwards .

A .  

Since its all fixed, why not go back to e85? Checkbuzz runs a gt3076 52t with return flow cooler on e85. Makes 320rwkw and full boost at 3200 rpm. Yes 3200 rpm. I would expect that figure to rise a bit with a quality cross flow cooler. I run an old blitz lm return flow on e85 and highflow 21u making 312rwkw. Air temp even at the track never goes over mid 30's unless ambient is above that. After a run I have touched the inlet to the cooler with was hot enough to almost burn, the outlet was cool as a cucumber. So they do a good job cooling but I believe flow/pressure loss may be the limiting factor. Keen to see results of this experiment especially on 98.

  • Like 1

I reckon go full flex, I love it.. pour whatever you feel like into the motor.. I drive down to Wakefield on 98 (great economy) do a few warm up laps to get the 98 tank down then fill it up with E85 for real time attack. Then when it's home time pour/blend whatever fuel I can find for the trip home.

Also, more boost.. tons more.

Plazmaman stop making those piping kits. I've asked for someone before, although it's listed on their website.

 

The stock SMIC piping is horrible for flow..Ditch as much of it as you can.

That R33 does have neat simple pipework and clears everything . With a bit of mucking around I suppose a decent OE style recirc vale could be adapted to it , something like an Evo one . Will look at the recirc plumbing on mine .

Tao says he uses Plasmaman pipes so they must still be available , possibly to special order . I'll ask Alex what they can do and if they can make it with a fitting for a recirc valve . This would be the only fiddly bit I can think of .  

A . 

300Kw Unopened 25 Club...
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/index.php?/topic/389417-300Kw-Unopened-25-Club%2E%2E%2E

There is no mystery restriction at 280rwkw... A GTRS simply isn't a 300rwkw turbo. All the info is in this thread

8 minutes ago, joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo said:

300Kw Unopened 25 Club...
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/index.php?/topic/389417-300Kw-Unopened-25-Club%2E%2E%2E

There is no mystery restriction at 280rwkw... A GTRS simply isn't a 300rwkw turbo. All the info is in this thread

Disco got rid of that GTRS ages ago lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...