Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure CEF33Y is running a TD05-18G from memory.

Here is a bit more info and another pic because your image doesn't work on mobile lith.

1NWW5YW.jpg

4bFRymq.jpg

It says it's in a nissan housing but doesn't mention what A/R. Either way its pretty shit and the exact opposite of what i am looking for haha. I agree that a 7163 would crush it and i'm hoping a 6758 would be miles ahead in repsonse and still make roughly the same power. 

Price wise the best i have found for a 6758 here in Australia is;

$1506 for a iron bearing supercore
$630 AUD for a G type (T4 TS .80 A/R) turbine housing
$16 for turbine locking tabs
$78 for wastegate brcaket kit and i already have an EFR compatible single port turbosmart wastegate

So roughly $2200 compared to the $2800 that cartel online has them listed for (which is the cheapest in AUS) and the $3000 that GCG has them for.

Almost ready to pull the trigger on buying this EFR setup!

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Pretty sure CEF33Y is running a TD05-18G from memory.

 

Nah, I'm running a Hypergear OP6 highflow.

Stock manifolds, unopened motor, just supporting mods on 98. Cheap setup, and i'm pretty happy with it (read- used to the lag)

Super keen to see what results you get though.

  • Like 1

Ah yeah, 18Gs are one of my less favourite units funnily enough - not least because they are heading in the direction of 20Gs for lag and 16Gs for power... hence I figure you go either 16G or 20G, there is no worthwhile in between despite everyone going for the 18G for some reason. <edit: I see Cef33y isn't, though the same still applies but it's more understandable that it's got so little at 4000>

Cool man, would love to see how that setup will go on a 20!!!  There is a disclaimer I always give for EFRs, don't jump to any conclusions of how it is performing until you actually drive it :)

Edited by Lithium

Yeah my bad i was thinking of CRSKmD! Yeah im sure it would be fun but the lag would be horrible for me (coming from a RB25/30 neo with a SS2 .82 rear). I fking love RB20's though and a 260-300kw RB20 is not by any means a slow thing. Sure its no absolute powerhouse but that is heaps of power to go and have fun at a track day/drift day. So i am obviously trying to cook up the best streetable RB20 possible.

17 hours ago, Lithium said:

Cool man, would love to see how that setup will go on a 20!!!  There is a disclaimer I always give for EFRs, don't jump to any conclusions of how it is performing until you actually drive it :)

And drive it i will! This is not going to be a car that lives in the shed, will be driving it daily as much as i can haha. I think i found your mate with the 7163 on the 3sGTE on youtube as well.

FWIW i have purchased a Garage7 IPC and will be using that in this build also. Seems like a very cool but of gear but will be interesting to see how it actually works in the real world.

59 minutes ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Yeah my bad i was thinking of CRSKmD! Yeah im sure it would be fun but the lag would be horrible for me (coming from a RB25/30 neo with a SS2 .82 rear). I fking love RB20's though and a 260-300kw RB20 is not by any means a slow thing. Sure its no absolute powerhouse but that is heaps of power to go and have fun at a track day/drift day. So i am obviously trying to cook up the best streetable RB20 possible.

Yeah, my cars have always been laggy, so don't know what I'm missing, haha

At 240rwkw, its plenty for what I do (drifting). Bonus is I don't use as many tires as other peeps.

 

 

They're saying that the turbo is creeping like hell and they managed to control it via their IPC (and a very soft spring I suppose) instead of porting the shit out of the wastegate.
So yes I think there is room for improvement, beginning by the wastegate porting.

  • 2 weeks later...
8 hours ago, driftnick13 said:

It's on a hub dyno, not sure if that makes a difference.

Nope, I've had a 50trim T3/T04E on the stock manifold a hub dyno with a stock RB20 and it was similar to the GTX on that plot... unless a VERY fast sweep was selected it seems rather laggy for what it is.

  • 2 weeks later...

Turbo purchased and should be here in next 2 weeks. Manifold getting made at the moment :) really wanted to make an exact copy of the Gibson one but there was a few factors stopping it and I ended up going a different route. Manifold is getting made with a 8374 so if i ever go RB26 it will fit perfectly no dramas. Baby little 6758 should fit easily haha.

Cooler piping will be done when turbo turns up.

received_10212408355514650.jpegreceived_10212414287582948.jpegreceived_10212414286222914.jpeg

  • Like 3

A hole in the bonnet should do it. It'll be easier after the first outing, just cut out the burnt area of paint!

Should be a fun car to drive, there's something about revving the crap out of an rb20 that feels good.

A hole in the bonnet should do it. It'll be easier after the first outing, just cut out the burnt area of paint!
Should be a fun car to drive, there's something about revving the crap out of an rb20 that feels good.


I know right! I honestly really do love them. Cant wait to spin this thing as hard as I can :)
Should sound great with that manifold, post some videos up when it's done.


Hopefully mate! The sound was a large part of the reason I went with a manifold like this. Will be going 3" straight through with twin 3.5" tips from Diff back

As I said there was a couple of reasons I couldn't go Gibson style, that was originally what I wanted. But after talks with my fabricator and facing some facts I decided on just going a completely custom manifold. Hopefully i can still get it to sound as close as possible to the Gibson item.

After deciding not to go with the Gibson I though I would try the gts-r manifold route. But decided against that in the end too. I have some tasty up close pics of a gts-r manifold though if you want them [emoji14]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...