Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 1/24/2019 at 6:33 PM, Mick_o said:

Trust me when i say the 1.05 wont be laggy.

I have an EFR 7670 1.05 on my Stock motor 4G63 Evo 9 and i make 500nm by 4000rpm & make 250kw by 4500rpm. I know its not the same turbo but it is 600cc & 2 cylinders smaller so on a "scale of things" is very relative i think. 

As i said save yourself money in the long run by "living with extra lag" its honestly a far better proposition than the abortion you are talking about doing mate!

Essentially you are destroying a turbine housing making it not worthy of buying welding up the gate. You will also need to modify your dump pipe as the IWG housing is way longer than the EWG

Next question is. How are you planning on controlling boost if you are going to weld the gate shut? 

If I can find someone with a similar setup I'll definitely try and get a steer to see how it responds for myself.

Hear what you're saying but honestly it's going to be a couple of years before the bottom end gets done. I can''t imagine it would be difficult to offload the housing if it all works well.

As for the dump pipe, to make up for the reduced length all I'll need to do is add a small extender section of tube with vbands on either side, no other changes

 

On 1/24/2019 at 7:42 PM, r32-25t said:

Educated guess says with wastegates off the manifold 

Yeah exactly. Looking at either a custom model or one of those swanky Garage Whifbitz ones.

I would prefer a 7670 with 1.05 vs a 8374 with a .92.

You very rarely regret going the larger rear, the harder you drive the car the more you will appreciate having some extra breathing room with the turbine housing.

Note: Either turbo is well into the category of "driven hard".

Get the 1.05, go EWG. It will be a healthier result even if the boost comes on 100rpm later, it will be a better thing to drive.

  • Like 3
On 1/30/2019 at 12:19 PM, Kinkstaah said:

I would prefer a 7670 with 1.05 vs a 8374 with a .92.

You very rarely regret going the larger rear, the harder you drive the car the more you will appreciate having some extra breathing room with the turbine housing.

Note: Either turbo is well into the category of "driven hard".

Get the 1.05, go EWG. It will be a healthier result even if the boost comes on 100rpm later, it will be a better thing to drive.

To add to this, I've never seen anyone downgrade an EFR - either to a smaller sized EFR, or to a smaller housing... if anything, they go UP.   

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
On 1/30/2019 at 10:19 AM, Kinkstaah said:

Get the 1.05

8374 or 7670?

To be completely clear- EWG is happening regardless of turbo choice, if I use the 8374 .92, I will be removing the actuator and welding the gate shut

On 2/1/2019 at 11:13 AM, Lithium said:

To add to this, I've never seen anyone downgrade an EFR - either to a smaller sized EFR, or to a smaller housing... if anything, they go UP.   

I've got no intention of downgrading, just trying to get the sizing right for my situation now.

I was hoping you would be able to weigh in with your experience regarding 2.6L builds- from what I've seen here and gtr.co.uk, you're involved in a lot of turbo builds and tuning? 

In my case, either. It's almost* always worth going the larger housing. I would definitely go the larger housing especially moreso if you're going to have to get the welder out to make the smaller housing work.

^^^^ this man is correct. Forget the .92 just get the 1.05. It just works! Gives you room to grow, keeps e map down, will help alot particularly in your situation where you will still be on petrol, Saves modding dump pipes & welding gates shut etc its seriously a no brainer. 

I can almost assure you Lith will tell you to run the 1.05 too. 

 

  • Like 2
40 minutes ago, shodan said:

I've got no intention of downgrading, just trying to get the sizing right for my situation now.

I was hoping you would be able to weigh in with your experience regarding 2.6L builds- from what I've seen here and gtr.co.uk, you're involved in a lot of turbo builds and tuning? 

Actually not too heavily with 2.6s tbh, though I've been lucky enough to experience an RB26 with a 1.05 EFR8374 and it really exceeded my expectations.  @Mick_o and @Piggaz have experienced it (funnily enough, they're how I managed to end up getting a ride in the car in question), as with others so can vouch for the fact it really was pretty epic.  For transparencies sake it's worth mentioning it had VCam, but it was also a stock bottom end RB26 so not exactly the full works thrown at it setup.

A couple of people I know have RB26 builds with EFR8374s coming together, and @usmair had a 1.05 EFR8374 on his RB26 as well... there are definitely people around to pick the brains on in terms of first hand experience on how such a combo can work.

 

Edited by Lithium

Responsive 400awkws single for an stock unmodified Rb26 engine. After doing trail and errors I think many aspects of the Rb26 is over rated. 

As a turbo mob, I have unlimited turbocharger resources in modding my own GTR, Goal was responsive 400awkws E85 fuel, single externally gated on an unopened, unmodified factory engine, that means, no cams gears, no cams, no bigger bottom ends, purely stock standard.   

After trailing various housings plus mixed and matching wheels. My final result on a unopened S3 R33 GTR was 411awkws on E85 fuel, It made 200awkws and 20psi by 4000RPM.  Power band was streetable and close to factory twin's response. Turbo was built with normal inconel turbine, cast comp wheel, ceramic ball bearing, nothing fancy. 

 Light blue ATR45SAT BB vs Red stock Rb26 twins:

powervsstock2.JPG 

  • Like 1
9 hours ago, hypergear said:

After doing trail and errors I think many aspects of the Rb26 is over rated. 

As a turbo mob, I have unlimited turbocharger resources in modding my own GTR, Goal was responsive 400awkws E85 fuel, single externally gated on an unopened, unmodified factory engine, that means, no cams gears, no cams, no bigger bottom ends, purely stock standard.   

After trailing various housings plus mixed and matching wheels. My final result on a unopened S3 R33 GTR was 411awkws on E85 fuel. Turbo was built with normal inconel turbine, cast comp wheel, ceramic ball bearing, nothing fancy. 

Agree RB26 is over rated.

Those results very good numbers, depending on what level of responsiveness (thinking about EFR crowd). 

Real message I'm seeing is "nothing fancy" can make good results.  Make sure the bases are properly covered (turbo, mani, gate, exhaust, inlet, fuel system, tune) and it's possible to achieve the goals. 

Not revving the tits off the stock engine might keep it alive longer too.

  • Like 1

Used lots a dynapacks and they don't have a tire interface so obviously the numbers are always going to be high on these. Power at hubs not at 'wheels' as quoted by lots :P

My figures well over 400 awkw (increase this by minimum 10+% to compare to a mainline roller dyno) on stock RB26 (unmolested factory engine).

EFR9180 1.05AR EWG set up, the std engines. Using the ~20psi target figure referenced here its at 4700rpm using 3rd gear on road.

 

 

stock RB26.jpg

Oh and dont ever use a cam based trigger for anything other than a phase signal ;) only rookies fark around with cam belt stuff honestly.

We were always knock limited, tried all of the bullshit half arse solutions out there, and in the end the root cause was found to be relying on engine position through cam belt, put on a proper crank based set up and then no issues using correct ignition timing and more peak speed timing and power, engine far more efficient and obviously able to run at/near knock limit all the time.

  • Like 2

Cheers for all the input, appreciate the advice. I don't think I'll bother with the .92 for a turbo that comes on ~250rpm sooner.

Shopping list looks like:

  • 8374 1.05
  • Hypertune T4 manifold
  • GFB EX44 wastegate x2
  • R33/R34 P/S pump
  • Custom downpipe with gates plumbed back

First step is upgrading to a modern ECU and MAP sensor- Haltech 2000 is on the cards..

Thanks again.

Edited by shodan
  • 2 weeks later...

I can recommend JHHs 1000hp ati balancer with integrated trigger wheel. they have a motec 36-2 wheel welded on the back of them along with a hall effect sensor and bracket.

very impressed with mine and a lot less f**king around than some other alternatives that require timing gear replacement and oil pump cutting. timing is now rock solid, it was abysmal with the cam trigger setup under heavy loads. let me get a good 3 degrees more timing into it at high loads (~30psi) which is LOTS of free power.

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
On 1/13/2019 at 8:16 AM, sneakey pete said:

Fixed that for you

Mate of mine is doing a 26 7670 build should be running in the next few months, will be interesting seeing how it goes compared to my 8374. Can't say i'm 100% convinced its the better option for pure street duties, though wouldn't go a 7670 for the track etc.

@Sneaky Pete has your mate finished his 26 7670 build? Any results and/or dyno sheet you could share?

On 3/2/2019 at 5:04 PM, r32-25t said:

You’ll need a balancer to go with the power steering pump 

 

Is that because of the different pulley?

 

On 3/12/2019 at 6:23 PM, burn4005 said:

I can recommend JHHs 1000hp ati balancer with integrated trigger wheel. they have a motec 36-2 wheel welded on the back of them along with a hall effect sensor and bracket.

very impressed with mine and a lot less f**king around than some other alternatives that require timing gear replacement and oil pump cutting. timing is now rock solid, it was abysmal with the cam trigger setup under heavy loads. let me get a good 3 degrees more timing into it at high loads (~30psi) which is LOTS of free power.

 

I've read ATI are great, what about the local Ross stuff?

9 minutes ago, shodan said:

 

Is that because of the different pulley?

 

 

I've read ATI are great, what about the local Ross stuff?

I went ATI, far less horror stories than with the Ross equivalent...

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...