Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Roughly what size turbo is that? Keeping in mind that it is going on an RB20. Only wanting absolute max 250ish kW to keep response as best as possible.

10 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Roughly what size turbo is that? Keeping in mind that it is going on an RB20. Only wanting absolute max 250ish kW to keep response as best as possible.

Yes can build u an atr43g2 in cbb model for rb20det, that will be responsive and max towards 250rwkws regions

Stao what version of the Atr45 do i have? i got it in dec 2013.

is it even worst then the 1st rev of the atr45sat?

 

do you have a graph that compares my old one to the newest?

 

And how much to upgrade or change to the latest?

  • Like 1

The ATR45 is a 3582 equivalent in .82 rear. It's good size turbo for a 3L bottom. The new one is a very different turbo and nothing interchangeable. Best sell that and we can build you a ball bearing one new from scratch.

On 9/16/2016 at 5:20 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

extremely funny looking graph :)

Yep, Seems the engine had broken ringland's at the time thanks to a bad 'run in tune'

Had no signs or anything obvious until after this tune. (different tuners)
 

  • 2 weeks later...
New version is a very different turbo.

Thanks Stao. Is if possible to build the new SS2 to the old dimensions so that it's a drop-in replacement?

I think Johnny said you need to adjust and rotate the dump a bit to accommodate the new one.

When Tao and are selves put Are heads together and come up with the 6765 , bb core t4 split pole rear ! This should de an animal on the new set up ! 

Big thanks to hypergear as usual 

stock Rb25 turbo for comparison 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

  • Like 3
29 minutes ago, 4bidn1 said:

I should really put my glasses on before typing on my phone ?. 

Thats not even English 

Lol...did you use talk to text?  Makes sense then being you're from Radelaide.  I'm going to call you Christopher Pyne from now on :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for posting, your engine bay looks tops. I'm fairly sure you posted the wrong video though, I think you were supposed to upload the one from your "private test road" where it's banging off the limiter with the gate open?
    • This is something to be careful of. I did a bit of digging on the NM35, as I spend a lot of time on near brand new cars and CANBus related stuff, which uses the same "OBD2" plug for a fair chunk of making my life easy. The NM35, does NOT support OBD2. The data pin is actually on Pin3, which is a manufacturer specific pin, and requires Consult3 to connect to the NM35. Your low voltage, is either because the NM35 doesn't have 12V to the constant power pin on the J1962 (OBD2) connector, OR, it is attempting the standard comms, (CanBus, K Line, etc) and can't see any voltage on those pins. Some people have had success accessing SOME data from the vehicle on OBD2 specification, using a module that supports KPW. My assumption, like Duncan has stated, it will likely actually be JOBD, where there is some cross over with the OBD2 and JOBD standards. Note, lots of "OBD2" dongles, do NOT support KPW, which is what you need for a lot of Japanese vehicles of this era (And even up until recent years!), EG, Subaru, Suzuki, etc.    The end of this thread is probably worth a read, as some people did find a way to get a display up in the NM35 recently, looks like someone implemented all the stuff needed to make it work. (The right protocols).  
    • Depending on the purpose of the car, and how much more fabbing you want to do, and what clearances you have, you could look to raise the motor, which will raise the front diff up. Likely would mean altering the chassis rails etc etc, hence the more fab work you'd need to do. However, this can create issues, not just in clearance with everything fitting under the bonnet, but you've also raised a LOT of weight up in the car, and this will DEFINITELY alter handling characteristics (But, so will how much weight you've already added to the front end). You'll also have to deal with the fact the gearbox to rear diff is now out of alignment too for the tail shaft, and alter the angle of the diff, or deal with a bit of potential vibration. Raising the motor an inch up, is effectively the same as making the whole car sit higher by not lowering it as far. So one inch higher motor, theoretically means you can drop the car an extra inch lower, and maintain the same angles in the CVs. Again, depends on the purpose of the car. If it's a just cruiser on the street car, maybe won't be an issue. If it's meant to be a time attack car, I can see you not wanting to raise the motor. This is just for you to ponder as an idea.
    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
×
×
  • Create New...