Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a g3 high flow, circa 2016-2017. Made 260rwkw @ 18psi on p98 and 312rwkw@ 20psi on united e85. 

 

18psi by 3400-3500 in 4th gear, makes around 10psi at 3000rpm. Pretty damn good for a bush bearing. 

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Its been a while since my last update, car had some engines issues as I found its lack of power and response compared to other R34s I’ve owned. Comp test reveal a 50psi drop at CYC 4 compare to other 5. I’ve had the engine stripped with intention of restoring OE compression, using a set of Nitto pistons, con rods, oil pump gears and valve springs. The rebuilt engine ended up with slight lower compression then standard but all even, it is making more power and been trouble free so far. I’m keeping the stock cams for now, it will be upgraded at later stages.


Currently pulling 424rwkws, for people whom’s interested in my setup it has:
9:1 CPR Nitto 20 thou forged pistons
Nitto Conrods
Korioautoparts Performance Radiator
4 inches metal intake pipe
Adaptronic Modular ecu
Split fire coil packs
3 inches turbo bach exhaust
Hypergear ATR45SS turbocharger
Electronic boost controller through ecu
Nismo twin plate cooper mix Clutch
18inches alloy wheel with Nitton tyres.
45mm Tial external gate with steam pipe high mount exhaust manifold.
ID1000 Injectors
525L Walbro fuel pump.
PWR FMIC
Nismo 2 way diff
Supertech Valve springs
All new engine bearings
Gates timing belt kit and water pump
Engine head oil restrictor and oil drain kit

Bit of Vid:

 

power.jpg

 

boost.jpg

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

6.9 Sec with 188 miles quarter run from last week, from one of our rebuilt, high flowed and ball bearing converted BW S400 turbochargers powering a built 4G63 Evo engine running about 55psi.

 

Edited by hypergear
  • 3 weeks later...

Some latest data about twin scroll exhaust manifold vs single scroll exhaust manifold. Still running the same turbo, now making 440rwkws @ 27psi while close to 500RPM more responsive. :

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Grey: Standard single collector T3 high mount exhaust manifold and single 40mm gate

Green / Orange: Twin scroll T3 high mount exhaust manifold with twin 40mm gates

440rwkw.jpg

boost.jpg

 

  • 1 month later...

What would you recommend for a neo 25, want to keep it low mounted and internally gated.

Has exhaust, cooler, nistune, injectors. Will have cam gears and maybe cam at this stage.

Daily, wanting around the 300kw mark but keep it as responsive as i can get

Get the latest revision of the SS2 with the CBB option.

Should get you near 300kW on 98RON with some mild cams and give instant boners.

ATR43SS2 BB in .63 internally gated or We can high flow your stock turbo to make around 280rwkws and that be super responsive also. 

This is an latest result of our latest profile of an 21U high flow on a stock engined R33 GTST with big cooler, Greddy inlet manifold, and 3.5 inches turbo back exhaust. 362rwkws @ 22psi E85 fuel.

362rwkw.jpg

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

The highflow is about $400 less than the ATR43 if you spec both with a BB centre. Think 950 vs 1370 and 1350 vs 1770 without and with BB respectively.

worth the BB?

29 minutes ago, Adz2332 said:

worth the BB?

That's a hell of a question. There's probably no argument that the performance increase you get for your $400 is worth it. If you look at the "cost of a horsepower" and then consider what those HP are worth when they're available some hundreds of rpm earlier, it is probably some of the best value performance available - if you're looking for response. Drag cars need not really apply.

For me, the whole prospect of buying a turbo is fraught with.....well, I can buy a HG hiflow for about a grand, but if I want to spec it up a bit it will cost me closer to $1500. And then it's just a highflow and I'd probably be smarter with a new turbo, and that will get me closer to $2k. And if I'm in for that much money for a turbo, then why am I not considering an appropriate sized EFR or G series for about $3k? And all of a sudden I have probably too much turbo for a nice streeter anyway (I mean seriously, how many seconds of value will I get from a 600HP turbo in a year? On the street that is.)

I think if I were willing to stick with a highflow, because I have a Neo, the OP6 housing would probably benefit from the BB centre to make sure it stays as responsive as possible. It just means you're not buying a turbo for less than the psychological threshold of a grand.

The responsiveness could be true of the ATR also, but I don't really know what the performance delta is. The money delta is kinda less of a concern, because you're already starting at nearly $1500. Know what I mean?

This is my opinion simplified - the turbo is the most important/best value upgrade on your car. It is always worth buying the best turbo you can afford. If you ever need a reminder of how important the turbo is, go drive a non-turbo skyline. 

There is only one caveat that I have for this, and that is if the turbo is a consumable on your car due to anti-lag etc. Then run what you can afford to regularly replace. 

ATR43SS-2 billet ball bearing turbo, most people tend to use them as a low mount bolt on. It works fine supporting 300rwkws on P98, Once given E85 and external gate it pulled 442rwkws with 280rwkws @ 4000RPM. This is a super fun daily or track car. 

turbo.jpg

enginebay.jpg

power.jpg

 

boost.jpg

 

Edited by hypergear
On 24/01/2020 at 12:43 PM, Adz2332 said:

gives me something to think about. what is the price diff between the 2?

The ATR43SS2 BB is a capable of much higher power levels then the high flow while not been any laggier. I guess if you have external gate E85 plans for up to 440rwkws E85 the SS2 will do, and this turbo works in both internal or external gate (obviously much high power externally gated).  

or if your goal is roughly 300rwkws and won't be thinking of of any thing much higher, then high flowed turbo will do fine.

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Pretty good result to share, From one of our ATR45SAT BB turbo externally gated on E85 fuel. Made 407rwkws @ 20psi with plenty of head room. R33 GTST with self built  Rb25det engine:

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Hypergear Atr43ss-3 Turbocharger Test and tune 474rwkws @ 28psi fuel system maxed. Should be seeing 500rwkws+ once fuel system sorted, and still seeing 265rwkws @ 4000RPM.

enginebay.jpg

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1

Considering sending in my rb25det turbo for a highflow sevice. How much extra would it be to have the OP6 rear housing added on to my S1 turbo? And what are the benefits? Drawbacks? Your website and this thread mention 3 or 4 different figures ranging from 450-500bhp. Just want some clarification. Much appreciated 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...