Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo


SimonR32

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the internal gate 20g sucked balls last night. Well it did perform well except it was running 21psi minimum. This on 98 octane, We got it up to around 280kw.

We tried everything to back the boost down, even had the wastegate flap off and was lazy onto boost but then ran 21psi after 5000.

Ill post sheet up later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not blakes old turbo.

Roy at 4750 there is a missfire, i have fitted splitfires which sorted the constant miss, and a few other things but there is a miss at 4750 everytime.

The dyno rpm scale isnt perfect guys. Working off roller speed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had barely any preload on my last td05h18g and I got full boost 19psi by 4200rpm on a sr but now got another one on the same engine but preloaded it about 3mm 3 complete turns in and now it makes 20psi by 4000rpm

Only difference now is its running eflex e85 where as it was running bp98 before

So not sure if preloading the wastegate tighter made the 200rpm boost response better or the fuel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not blakes old turbo.

Roy at 4750 there is a missfire, i have fitted splitfires which sorted the constant miss, and a few other things but there is a miss at 4750 everytime.

The dyno rpm scale isnt perfect guys. Working off roller speed

Ah, k.

Did you try increase the spark dwell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No i didnt. Car will be back monday night. Worked on ur car, ill try it on the rb25 tomorrow. Only 1 trouble area at 5000.

He is going to weld a new dump to the turbo, the stock setup even with the die grinded outlet sucks balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah me clutch fail!

Did you get a graph anyway?

On the news on poncams for my car, someone has a spare set lying around who I'm going to do some deals with so will have new results soonish :whistling:

Hey Simon how does your old T04Z GTR compare with ur current T67 GTst in terms of rolling runs on the street, take -off and seat of the pants whack?? Much in it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah it should get close, was told it had a new clutch..big words like heavy duty and ceramic were used...

looks like they were just that... words :/

I hate the screamer already, when it first cracked I thought WTF!!!...some more work for you Scotty..lol

Thin red line is my old turbo, I have lost a little down low but it doesnt really feel any slower ..power ramps up so much nicer..

DSC04047.jpg

It Did hit 276kw at one point, holds boost nice too

DSC04048.jpg

Im just happy I can drive it again and as long as I dont mash the pedal too hard the clutch holds up ok :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...