Jump to content
SAU Community

Vic Wasteland Thread


R31Nismoid

Recommended Posts

Steer clear the finance company will not tell you the payout figure and you run a risk of the seller not paying the finance.. by law the bike can be repossessed without any question

When I bought my 1st gtr, I contacted finance company requesting a figure saying I have seller's permission to ask, and they gave me a figure and I made a bank cheque payable to the finance company, seller ended up gave me loose change cos it was like $11 or something more than asking price.

T'was kinda strange experience of receiving loose change and keys at the end of transaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just picked up the new nissan qashqai - worst car name ever. Car however quite impressive epic list of features and very refined.

I are impressed.

Kids on the way mate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kids on the way mate?

lol nah the audi turned to a heap of shit so got this ill get it stickered up with work branding for couple of years then give it to the wife it's a bit of a stop gap cos I want the Lexus rc but isn't out and couldn't wait. Tell ya what though it's top of the range and you'd pay at least 40-50k more for a similar spec level in a German brand which seems a bit silly to me these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cool thanks for the response.. I think it looks like he has it on his mortgage.. wonder if that'll make it even harder.

I sincerely doubt that.

If he has restructured his mortgage to include the bike, the bike will likely now be unencumbered.

There is not a lot (read 0) incentive for a banker to bother registering a charge to a measley $14k asset to secure a mortgage, let alone one that will depreciate rapidly. I wouldn't even be able to use one as security for a house if I wanted to bother due to depreciation vs loan term.

Not to mention, depreciating assets really cant be used as regulated home loan security anyway... as a business product it is technically possible, however highly stupid and extremely unlikely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that jsut a more feature heavy big version of a dualis?

Yeh it's the replacement of dualis just a name change looks a lot nice I reckon and slightly larger I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
    • You have your numbers back to front. 350mm from wheel centre to guard lip would be scrapinly low and the suspension arms would be at spastic angles and it would have the road manners of a meth affected giraffe. You can down to ~450mm (from larger stock starting values about 50ish mm higher than that) before you start to create to many problems.
×
×
  • Create New...