Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The big plus side of having compatable international rules in all series is the fact that cars can travel overseas and have a good run at it. Building cars for each of the series to compete in other countries is too much.

Noel makes a good point, those front running cars are very cool too watch. I think this year has changed the game, NEMO racing did an insane job of resetting the benchmark. I don't like the idea of making rules to ban cars but another class may be in order, AERO class or PROTOTYPE class to put these cars in. Making rules is never easy but could incorporate the footprint of the car, such as no more than 10%(?) extra width / length protruding, tube frames etc. As hrd-hr30 said maybe slicks allowed in that class also, as the aero etc has taken them way out of the realm of tuned street cars.

  • Replies 742
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's exactly what it is at the moment Ray. It's quite a young form of motorsport, and as Drifting once was, is not that organised. Props to the guys over here to get such a World Class event going in such a short amount of time. This isn't a massive company with endless means and time, and they are still learning. Let's not forget that ;) From what I've seen they've done a fabulous job thus far, and I'm sure they will fine tune the rules and setup to suit the newfound global position it now has.

As for the image above of Nemo, I also thing that must be a very early image. Last photo I saw it didn't have B-Pillars at all.

Well done to all who competed, looked like a great event and one that I'm sorry I missed. Looking forward to next year!

From what I understand, the various world time attack events are seperate events with different rule books? The organisers need to develop standardised rule books for the world time attack series as a whole. It should be the same rules whether it be in Japan, Australia, the USA, or wherever. And, whole Nemo smashed everyone, there were some insanely fast cars that had lap times that were faster than last year's winning lap time. So teams have the means and tech to compete with Nemo. As has already been said, they can either decide that it's too hard and give up or they can decide to accept the challenge and come back with faster cars. I'm hoping it's the latter.

Well given that the TIlton car was reportedly running basically as a FWD when it set it's fastest time sounds like it may have been able to rival Nemo with it's problems ironed out.

Pretty impressive given how much it still resembles an evo with bolt ons, not unlike the Cyber evo when they were running Voltex.

to big translator for all japan time attack rule - hiroaki sorry

hiroaki not wanted bad voice argument sorry try be friendly to australia time attack

wish NEMO black r34 cyber garage revolution all racers together in australia 2013 - maybe hiroaki go to australia yes

The rules not only need to be defined, but imo opinion i dont think 3 classes can cater for the various forms of cars out there.

Even if clubsprint for example is split into several different classes, allowing basically stock cars to the more extreme versions to compete in their own right.

to big translator for all japan time attack rule - hiroaki sorry

hiroaki not wanted bad voice argument sorry try be friendly to australia time attack

wish NEMO black r34 cyber garage revolution all racers together in australia 2013 - maybe hiroaki go to australia yes

Hiroaki, you haven't caused an argument. It's just that it's clear the rules need improving and/or enforcing.

Meh to international rules. The Japanese GT racing is different to the Europeans which is different to the Americans so what chance has a club level scene got?

I think the main thing is to stay away from slicks. I would be interested to know the one lap pace difference of a slick vs semi....as loads of the slicks out there are for controlled series and doubt they are that brilliant a tyre

i think Nemo is planning on going to the states and Japan and would be allowed to compete with the current set up, to me that means Australia has got the rule mix right although need to enforce it.

if anything for the states Nemo could run a slick that is a lot wider and go quicker again.

The rules not only need to be defined, but imo opinion i dont think 3 classes can cater for the various forms of cars out there.

Even if clubsprint for example is split into several different classes, allowing basically stock cars to the more extreme versions to compete in their own right.

Honestly - I don't see the point to Clubsprint in Time Attack. It's kind of completely against the point of the event to run stockish cars. And this is coming from someone who was supposed to be in Clubsprint. It just doesn't feel like it belongs at this event and given the fastest Clubsprint cars were all bloody open class cars anyways, I think if a field of cars ran around in the guise the class was supposed to be then everyone would just look at them and think "why are they here?".

I reckon they'd be better off having more Open cars and splitting 4WD and 2WD categories and giving more reward / focus to good 2WD entries.

So instead of 50 Open class cars and 25 Clubsprint they could have roughly 30 AWD Open and 30 2WD Open cars and scrap Club. Top 5 from each get Pro invites for the following year.

My 2c anyways.

so i assume club cars dont need to be roadworthy, just needs current rego?

doesnt seem legit

Its like the other rules and regs Ive seen that say the car must be registered and have a engineers cert for any modifications to run in SVD, Ive never been asked to show a cert once.

If the car is meant to be regoed it should at least look like it could pass a slip.

Im only a occasional weekend warrior but it seems, at local super sprint events anyway, you pick the class you think you would be competetive in and go from there, Im only there for fun but I feel bad for the people running to the rules in their group whilst others blatently disregaurd the rules and enter their car in the wrong group.

A friend has a reasonably standard WRX who plays by the rules but others in his class have cars that are so far away from that class its not funny but they are still entering the same class as him.

He says its cool but you can tell that it guts him, at least he is cool in the knowledge that he is doing it right and the others are cheats.

Touching on marks post

While it sucks people turn their noses up at the rule book

It would be silly to scare people away by stripping engines etc at the end of an event

I certainly couldn't afford to have that happen to me, and even if money was no object it would annoy me to say the least at club level, national level racing is understandable

So with wtac/SL only being around since 09 I can see why they are allowing anything to enter (unless it's a Porsche lol)

But given entries sell out damn near instantly it would be nice to see them advvertise the fact that all cars must be to the letter of the regs or risk being booted and not welcome back until the car checks out, give the average club guy a chance to stick it to the guys with big cheque books

Why would someone like me want to enter, when I would prob be 15 secs a lap off the pace even though my car would be more of a club car than a carbon winged warrior lol

Either way super lap is for the bigger budgets and cams sprints will tide the rest of us over I guess

But given entries sell out damn near instantly it would be nice to see them advvertise the fact that all cars must be to the letter of the regs or risk being booted and not welcome back until the car checks out, give the average club guy a chance to stick it to the guys with big cheque books

They sent correspondence about tyre choice, but didn't police it during the event. Similar thing regarding FRP/Carbon fenders.

Touching on marks post

While it sucks people turn their noses up at the rule book

It would be silly to scare people away by stripping engines etc at the end of an event

Its the blantant stuff that erks me, his class states the car must be standard with only a few mods here and there, but he is up against cars that have the dash gutted, carbon bonnets, doors, boots, guards, wings, splitters, big boost and stuff.

But I 100% agree that super lap should be the best of the best, why would I want to pay money for something I can see every weekend at a race track near me, I want stupid fast cars with every bell and whistle.

They should have two groups, insanely fast and stupidly insanely fast.

Im just pissed that I missed it because work thought it would be better for me to be living out in the range for a couple of weeks.

FTA

Its like the other rules and regs Ive seen that say the car must be registered and have a engineers cert for any modifications to run in SVD, Ive never been asked to show a cert once.

If the car is meant to be regoed it should at least look like it could pass a slip.

Im only a occasional weekend warrior but it seems, at local super sprint events anyway, you pick the class you think you would be competetive in and go from there, Im only there for fun but I feel bad for the people running to the rules in their group whilst others blatently disregaurd the rules and enter their car in the wrong group.

A friend has a reasonably standard WRX who plays by the rules but others in his class have cars that are so far away from that class its not funny but they are still entering the same class as him.

He says its cool but you can tell that it guts him, at least he is cool in the knowledge that he is doing it right and the others are cheats.

Unfortunately that sort of cheating happens a lot, good on your mate for standing firm.

Honestly - I don't see the point to Clubsprint in Time Attack. It's kind of completely against the point of the event to run stockish cars. And this is coming from someone who was supposed to be in Clubsprint. It just doesn't feel like it belongs at this event and given the fastest Clubsprint cars were all bloody open class cars anyways, I think if a field of cars ran around in the guise the class was supposed to be then everyone would just look at them and think "why are they here?".

I reckon they'd be better off having more Open cars and splitting 4WD and 2WD categories and giving more reward / focus to good 2WD entries.

So instead of 50 Open class cars and 25 Clubsprint they could have roughly 30 AWD Open and 30 2WD Open cars and scrap Club. Top 5 from each get Pro invites for the following year.

My 2c anyways.

like

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...