Jump to content
SAU Community

300Kw Unopened 25 Club...


Recommended Posts

Yep 3 different testers my tuner could beleive it runs as well makes the power it does on such low boost 17psi.

Doesnt have any blow bye no smoke no oil use etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive power for an unopened motor. ...

Not sure if Royce has posted here, but he is running 730whp on his stock bottom end neo.

Or maybe it was 630. Either way, impressive.

Edited by sleptema
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The precise symptoms I was talking about. My 33, and a couple of other customers had the same issues after using motul. Not sure why.

What Nulon did you put in your 33? How long was it on the motul with ticking before you swapped over?

Sorry for all the questions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if Royce has posted here, but he is running 730whp on his stock bottom end neo.

Or maybe it was 630. Either way, impressive.

He's now at 850hp on standard bottom end. Only has cams/springs/studs. Check post #1035 in rb25 turbo upgrade dyno thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

MODS: gt35, top mount, 44 wastegate, fmic, ffp, id1000 injecters, vipec ecu

FUEL: bp98

POWER: 308 kw

Oil: PENRITE 10/40

USEAGE: everything

LIFESPAN: 3days so fare

FAILURE: plugs. To hot

COMMENTS: hates getting its feet wet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That dyno curve looks like a V8's, need's some early spiking on the controller

Was that in reference to my dyno ? When it gets retuned i will have the ebc in there that boost is just straight from the waste.

Reason i havent gorne higher boost is no studs or gasket but may look at setting it to spike upto say 20 and run 18 19 should also make 30 40 more uptop this time as got free flowing exhaust to go in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Nulon did you put in your 33? How long was it on the motul with ticking before you swapped over?

Sorry for all the questions!

SYN15W50-5.jpg

Problems with motul oil was almost instant in my R33, Which is why I thought there may have been an existing issue with the lifters, but then was told about the exact same issue with other 25's. Couldn't tell you how long I had the motul in there with the lifters.... but it wasn't long. New lifters in, and full flush and oil change, including oil cooler etc. Never had another issue.

Tuner didn't elaborate on the other 33's at his shop it'd happened too, just it was why he doesn't stock or use motul any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R33 Gts-t series 2

mods: Highflow op6, 1000cc xspurt injectors, aero flow top feed rail, straight through 3" exhaust, z32 afm, nistune, big front mount, bosch 044 intank pump
fuel: Bp 98/United e85
power: 280kw/313kw @ 17psi with a leak in the intake plenum
oil: Penrite racing 10w/40
useage: Street weapon
lifespan: only 3 months so far, has had a hard life.
failure: Walbro 460lph e85 pump failed at 300kw, had to replace with the bosch 044.
comments: Feels good, will be going highmount, twin scroll hopefully soon. Running 21psi now, so should be up close to 340-350kw ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was another issue with your setup if the Walbro 460L stopped, they are nearly bullet proof Ashley, and flow substantially more than the 044's.

Don't bother with the highmount, if you externally gate the turbo the stock manifold will flow 450 odd kw with better response. There is plenty more in your current setup by the looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was another issue with your setup if the Walbro 460L stopped, they are nearly bullet proof Ashley, and flow substantially more than the 044's.

Don't bother with the highmount, if you externally gate the turbo the stock manifold will flow 450 odd kw with better response. There is plenty more in your current setup by the looks.

I'm not sure how much mine is making but what about the 21u high flow?

I believe is only rated 30 hp less than op6...will ewg improve?

I can list my mods though if needed

Ps. U mean 450 odd hp and not kw right?

Edited by -S-
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less back pressure, more power so if you relieve as much back pressure as possible your motor aka air pump will flow more air thus producing more power.

Another reason why going a decent manifold and EWG will make more power however with some added lag OR same can be said about welding a gate on top the housing and ditching the IWG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was another issue with your setup if the Walbro 460L stopped, they are nearly bullet proof Ashley, and flow substantially more than the 044's.

Don't bother with the highmount, if you externally gate the turbo the stock manifold will flow 450 odd kw with better response. There is plenty more in your current setup by the looks.

Wouldn't high mount be a good thing at that power level, if the tune is averaging EGT's and mixtures then having equal length runners should give a better safer tune for a stock bottom end?

Edited by AngryRB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any chance you can get a Nistune board installed instead and set the speed limit to whatever your tires can handle?
    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...