Jump to content
SAU Community

2013 V8 Supercar Series


Whiplash
 Share

Recommended Posts

COTF shares an almost identical weight distribution to previous cars.

The old diffs were heavy and by the time you added drive shafts, spool center, crown wheel and pinion, diff bracing, watts link , bearing carriers, brakes etc to them the weight crept up.

The tank was also behind the rear axle. A full fuel safe sprint cell with swirl pot reserve and pumps was around 130kg.

The new transaxle is lighter than the fuel system and diff of old combined.

The COTF fuel tank is slightly heavier than the Hollinger which was In roughly the same position (further forward obviously but I between the axle none the less)

The chassis are not that dissimilar in terms of torsional rigidity and behaviour.

Regardless of what people think the floor pans of last years car right back to VX have very little incommon with the road car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the DVS cars still a relivent stepping stone to the main game with the new cars? I notice Luff and Purcat are in Porsche Cup this year, and I remember Skaife saying this years cars drove more like Porsche Cup cars

Yes still relevant - but obviously not as much as last year. The COTF is, fundamentally, a different beast to setup & drive than last years cars. One result will be that the co-driver/internationals (if they are going to the Gold Coast this year) wont suck as much in comparison to the regulars as the cars are

A: Easier to drive

B: More like other categories in the way they drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is for GTR and skyline owners.

I've owned over 15 of them in 10 years.......

When I locked up tonight there was 14 cars in my workshop, 8 of them are Skylines, 7 of those are seriously high end preped Motorsport cars.

.....

But how many could do 1000 racing Kms around bathurst? The engineering on Gibsons cars was amazing. It may be old now, but doesnt make it bad. Group a also gave some creative interpretation of rules, which was interesting, and something you don't get in the current series, for better or worse.

You can still see the grp a cars, and get closer than you ever would have been able to for the fans. Go to http://www.heritagetouringcars.com.au/

On topic, I really looking forward to seeing the v8s this weekend. Hopefully the new marques can improve, and the Mercs have a more consistent meet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly there is 3 I'd send up there as is and one more that would be close.

There is harder places on the tour than Bathurst. Clipsal was one of them. Chaos canyon on surfers is obviously another.

What GMS did with the GTR will always be admired. They took a nugget of a car and made it great, no doubt.

I'm betting there will be a win this year for Scotty mcglauclan. GRM have a pair of good cars this year and Scott has a lot of COTF miles. On one of his better known circuits I think he will come out on top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quiet thread is quiet.

Couple of good races today, looks like some of the nissans are set up really soft in the front end- searching for fnt end grip maybe?

What happened to the Merc? Did it pop an engine today? I saw lots of smoke on the screen, I did wonder if he over rev'd it coming into T1, because it did sound tough right before the smoke poured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was right about him getting a win but so early was surprising.

Even though 6 faster cars were relegated to the back helped his cause its good to see.

Hopefully he'll back it up. Great for Rodgers to finally get a win on the board too. Caruso was a bit of a flop and captain crash spent more time running into things than racing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what was the go?

I heard that they got excluded because of ignition timing irregularity. Did they reduce timing to get better drive in the wet? Or was it something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand ECU base timing was 7 or 8 deg and the crank sensor had been adjusted to give the 6 deg required base timing.

Timing light would have displayed 6 deg which is why there was no performace gains but the ecu has its trigger angles locked and they had 7 or something as base.

Chances are the engines have all been like this since they left the engine shop (they all use the same engine shop bare the Kelly's) Kelly's engines may have been at the same shop prior to Melbourne though.

There would have been no data available to V8 supercars from previous rounds so they could only infringe the last race.

When I installed the KRE built aurora engine in my VY we used a timing light and adjusted the crack sensor to get 6degrees base. Never even looked at what the ecu had as base.

There is actually very little you can do with the controlled ECU as far as ignition mapping goes. You have maximum timing numbers and the engines take those numbers very very easily. So its a case of throttle open maximum allowed timing and trim the fuel to suit done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the go with Moffat? Is he lucked upon some good results or is the guy actually reasonably talented and starting to find some form?

I can't stand Moffat.

There is something about the guy that irritates me. He has had some shining moments for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

probably cause he'd be serving big macs if he had a different last name

Give him a break. Its not like his old man is bung full of charisma. Or that the rest of the field isnt the son of someone famous/rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

some very good racing this weekend. certainly showed why it deserves it's place at the top of australian motorsport. plenty of close racing, with a bit of panel rubbing. as far as viewing goes, it really does make f1 look pretty boring, where the cars being within a few metres of each other only really happens on behind a safety car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

120L of fuel in the cell. I know the aurora engines the fast holden teams have use on average .9L/km. Kelly's claim they having fuel consumption issues so wouldn't surprise me if they are using 1.2L/km. plus the formation lap would have them out of fuel buy the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...