Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As for torque monster....its only 3.2L

No engine with only 3.2L to play with will be a low down torque monster

Arh yeah, you should climb into my 32 one day, only 2.6 and a massive torque monster

I was in Canberra over the weekend with the 34 doing the hill climb

  • Like 1

You can't tune past 25 on 98, if you're lucky.

You'll get heaps more on E85. e.g. my car made 100kw more with 2-3psi increase on E85, over 98

Paul was saying something similar and I will do an E85 tune but not a lot of chances to use it here and I am happy enough with how it runs on 98, it is fun as a DD :)

It will be interesting to see what the E85 produces with this builds specs ?. Looking at some posts it seems to vary quite a bit from car to car ??

Dont get me wrong, this car gets up and goes pretty good and is easy on the bends with the more linear acceleration and the drive train seems great, smooth and planted , but pushed really hard ??????

The thing is. Why get a big hp turbo and not use it to its potential?

If you really wanted response then you could have gotten a smaller single that would spool quicker and get you to 380/400 kW

I was learning, took a T78 off and put the 6262 on and it went much better, still not happy BUT accept for the cams I kept most of the bolt ons and did the 3.2 build. If I am not happy I will do something about it,.

But for now happy enough, tomorrow ???

The thing is. Why get a big hp turbo and not use it to its potential?

If you really wanted response then you could have gotten a smaller single that would spool quicker and get you to 380/400 kW

On petrol? As said earlier, you're really boost limited on 98, WHICH HE IS ON ATM!

Give the bloke a chance to get it drunk and turn the wick up.

I can't see a smaller turbo on 98 getting close to the 400 mark.

Far too many guys just look at the peak number. I'm sure if guys got in it and drove the thing they would get out pretty impressed. Midrange grunt > topend. Keep the top end for pissing in your mates pockets in the pub.

Wow. Tell us what you really think Paul.

Anyways. Wouldn't be a problem if he wasn't hell bent on response. But now it's a double standard.

Not my car.

Paul never says what is on his mind, wimpy fag !

Where is the double standard ?

I expected more but happy with what I have, it is a well balanced DD, goes quick and holds the road like shat to a blanket, all good :wub:

Just a couple of tweaks and :)

  • Like 1

Its all good, like Paul said no doubt it will be a torque monster. More boost and ethenol will make heaps of difference. If your spark is failing which sounds like it may be the case, id consider getting a Morris tech ignitor like myself and Paul (I know you already have spitfire coil packs).

And I agree with Micks post.. CRD are a rip, I've seen some of their invoices and they prey on the unknowing. And their tunes are not the best in the business.

Best result would be.

Get password, take to UE, get re-tune.. Happy days.. If they built the engine properly, it won't blow up

  • Like 1

$1600 :(

It is hard being in this situation, I have an expensive build and once I change shops my warranty goes out the window and the new shop does not put their warranty on the car ?

There are a few things I am not happy with and will try and work it out first.

And 1600 for a petrol tune is f**king bullshit.

If they gave me 1600 to tune my car I'd still tell them to stick it

Edit 1600... Still f**ked

you get the invoice after the tune , what the f**k can you do

Its all good, like Paul said no doubt it will be a torque monster. More boost and ethenol will make heaps of difference. If your spark is failing which sounds like it may be the case, id consider getting a Morris tech ignitor like myself and Paul (I know you already have spitfire coil packs).

And I agree with Micks post.. CRD are a rip, I've seen some of their invoices and they prey on the unknowing. And their tunes are not the best in the business.

Best result would be.

Get password, take to UE, get re-tune.. Happy days.. If they built the engine properly, it won't blow up

The 34 has built in ignitors, the Mojo LS2 kit is what i'm going to get

  • Like 1

Arh yeah, you should climb into my 32 one day, only 2.6 and a massive torque monster

I was in Canberra over the weekend with the 34 doing the hill climb

I'm sure it is torquey.....for a 2.6

but compare it to...oh I dunno a blown 6.2 LSA...both at road speeds and revs.

That's what I was getting at

Going to get it all done and dusted and work out what I want to do.

I will get the E85 flex tune soon.. and when I am getting that done I ask about ignitors . Spitfire coils any good ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...