Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ah is that why you like your "response" you have been driving VQ motors that are 3.5L TT.

Now the world is becoming clear.

Next stop R35 GTR time?

lol, I was thinking of getting a GT-R , they are fast with a shitload of grunt BUT the Skyline Rs had something, I wanted a stick shift and the feeling of driving the car, not so much as the car driving me, well that was how I looked at it. I also preferred the look of the Rs.

I will get the car were I am happy, very close now except there were problems and I am having them fixed and adding a couple more mods that I can use when I feel like it, so all good :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:

Be good to see it end with a positive result.

Makes 2 of us Brent, plus the blokes that want the thread ended regardless of the result , shit Jono wanted it closed, post one , sorry :/

For me it will only end with a good result :)

Makes 2 of us Brent, plus the blokes that want the thread ended regardless of the result , shit Jono wanted it closed, post one , sorry :/

For me it will only end with a good result :)

Ben told you the outcome in post #6 :blink:

what a wizard! haha

  • Like 1

Ben told you the outcome in post #6 :blink:

what a wizard! haha

Shit, I was told that long before this thread started, by just about everyone that knew what I wanted from the car, haha

It was never going to be better than the TT350GT from idle ,but I never wanted it so you had to rev the shit out of it to get it going. It is getting there and we will see how it goes after the work is finished.

The 350TT is 254RWKW as to 380awkw from the 34, how do you think they would stack up against each other now, both around the same weight but the 350 has .3lt more ?

is a water/meth kit out of the question pete? Must be some good kits out that are reliable and have fail safes, would put the car on another level to now...

After all of this is done I am sure if I want a bit extra grunt, E85 will do the job :geek:

Seems like this thread has turned sour

yeah seems that way, I wonder why :/

What can I say, the thread is dragging on killing time, yes , its boring, yes , but I cannot understand why you bother reading it if it upsets you , more so, why you bother to waste your valuable time posting all of that helpful info you have passed along.

But on the up side, it will be over in a few days and you can go back to whatever you do in the real world, so all good :)

Edited by Nismo 3.2ish

Wouldn't your tank be empty driving home from the nearest e85 pump?

Yes, but I could have a tank full of fun emptying it and get to feel the different way the car runs on E85 :)

Who knows maybe a station will open closer to home in the future.

I thought the car was getting flex tuned Pete?

Buy a few jerries and stock up in Gosford when ya pick the car up from Jez ;)

It is, this week, Jez has to finish off some wiring and ready to tune , before he does the tune he is going through the things that could be causing the the boost lag and crossing them off the list.

But Jerrie cans, you sound like Paul lol

I go to Newcastle and Sydney a bit and will fill up there, I will check out the web site again and see if there are any new stations with E85.

But I will use it when I can just for fun, this way I will not be used of it and it will be a treat :woot:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't they cool down technically when you're sitting at a set of lights? 
    • The circuit if not a resistor divider is using an opamp to deliver a specific current normally. By maintaining the current as resistance changes, the voltage does too. Add to that, thermistors are normally non linear too,which can make creating a function impossible. Most uses of a thermistor people will utilise a lookup table to get the corresponding temperature.
    • On a scale of 1 to 10, how shit are the RE003's? (10 being ultra mega shit) Was hoping they'd be alright for a non-daily driven R32 that might get driven to Charnwood Macca's in the dry once a month, and maybe the odd hoon up and down the hills that pass for mountains in sunny Canberra.  Bob Jane currently running a "Buy 4 Get 1 Free" deal on RE003s and my brain can't comprehend anything else being value for money
    • Yeah, they look good. I should try to fit them on mine. But being a GTSt, the guard shape probably doesn't suit properly.
    • Nah, it's not a simple voltage divider. I'm not enough of an electronics guru to know how they make these circuits work. If I had a better idea of how the ECU's temperature measuring is done, I could then actually do as you want, which is turn that resistance chart into a voltage chart. But my approach has not worked. What I did was interpolate the sensor ohms values for the temperatures you listed, as you did not have any of them on a temperature ending in zero or 5. These are: °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) 58 2.68 11.85 57 2.7 11.89 56 2.74 11.93 54 2.8 12.01 49 3.06 12.208 47 3.18 12.284 43 3.37 12.42 I then assumed 5V supply to the resister and calculated the voltage drop across the sensor for each of those, which is just 5 - the above voltages, and then calculated the current that must be flowing through the sensor. So you get:             Values in sensor °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) Supply volts Volt drop Current 58 2.68 11.85     5 2.32 0.195781 57 2.7 11.89     5 2.3 0.19344 56 2.74 11.93     5 2.26 0.189438 54 2.8 12.01     5 2.2 0.183181 49 3.06 12.208     5 1.94 0.158912 47 3.18 12.284     5 1.82 0.14816 43 3.37 12.42     5 1.63 0.13124 And then use that current and the ECU's sensed voltage (which must be the voltage drop across the in ECU resister is there is one) to calculate the resistance of that in ECU resistor. You get:             Values in sensor   Other resistor °C ECU V sensor ohms (interpolated) Supply volts Volt drop Current   Volt Drop Resistance 58 2.68 11.85     5 2.32 0.195781   2.68 13.68879 57 2.7 11.89     5 2.3 0.19344   2.7 13.95783 56 2.74 11.93     5 2.26 0.189438   2.74 14.46381 54 2.8 12.01     5 2.2 0.183181   2.8 15.28545 49 3.06 12.208     5 1.94 0.158912   3.06 19.25592 47 3.18 12.284     5 1.82 0.14816   3.18 21.46325 43 3.37 12.42     5 1.63 0.13124   3.37 25.67816 And that's where it falls apart, because the resulting resistance would need to be the same for all of those temperatures, and it is not. So clearly the physical model is not correct. Anyway, you or someone else can use that information to go forward if someone has a better physical model. I can also show you how to interpolate for temperatures between those in the resistance chart. It's not fun because you've got to either do it like I did it for every 5°C range separately, or check to see if the slope remains constant over a wide range, then you can just work up a single formula. I'm just showing how to do it for a single 5° span. For the 58°C temperature, resistance = 11.77+2*(11.97-11.77)/5 The calc is a little arse backwards because the resistance is NTC (negative temperature coefficient), so the slope is negative, but I'm lazy, so I just treated 58 as if it was 2 degrees away from 60, not 3 degrees away from 55, and so on.
×
×
  • Create New...