Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is on 98 Pump
Here is the overlay of the car as it arrived.
If i hold the car at 3300rpm under load i can get 20psi.
This dyno run is seeing 22psi at 3950rpm and revving to 7000rpm in 5th gear

The Pic is an overlay of the run he did when I dropped it off (green) and today (red)

Not sure when the E85 will be done?

post-52098-0-28129200-1439435816_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2

Thats a f**ken epic result Pete!

You're gunna be in for a shock now when you drive it on Petrol let alone E85 lol!

Expect near the 500kw zone on E85 mate.. Congrats and well done to Jezzabelle and the boys sorting out the horrible mess you had! Cant wait to hear your thoughts when you drive it now!

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 1

Thats a f**ken epic result Pete!

You're gunna be in for a shock now when you drive it on Petrol let alone E85 lol!

Expect near the 500kw zone on E85 mate.. Congrats and well done to Jezzabelle and the boys sorting out the horrible mess you had! Cant wait to hear your thoughts when you drive it now!

Yeah Mate, I knew it was a heap of shit the way it was, and I think this proves it :nyaanyaa:

I think I might start using the seat belt now :woot:

Don't forget your adult diapers as well as that seat belt!

Yeah i always knew it was POS when i saw the dynosheet let alone your impressions of how it drove!

You wont want to get out of it now mate!

Yeah Mate, I knew it was a heap of shit the way it was, and I think this proves it :nyaanyaa:

I think I might start using the seat belt now :woot:

So he changed the turbo rear? Good thinking

No, the PT6266 was on it all the time, it was not the PT6262 that was supposed to be ordered, this was the thing I said I would post at the end, but I waited for someone to see it on the Dyno Graph.

When I posted the pic of the 6Boost being installed I had an email from the old builder saying , oh you might notice the Turbo is a different model, I said yes it was noticed and he said that he told me about this when the build was being done, I said I think I would remember that, he said I might have been pissed, good call but that is something I would remember , well , I would think I would remember, hic hic

But all good as it is a better Turbo for the job on the 3.2 , but not for the 2.6

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...