Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is on 98 Pump
Here is the overlay of the car as it arrived.
If i hold the car at 3300rpm under load i can get 20psi.
This dyno run is seeing 22psi at 3950rpm and revving to 7000rpm in 5th gear

The Pic is an overlay of the run he did when I dropped it off (green) and today (red)

Not sure when the E85 will be done?

post-52098-0-28129200-1439435816_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2

Thats a f**ken epic result Pete!

You're gunna be in for a shock now when you drive it on Petrol let alone E85 lol!

Expect near the 500kw zone on E85 mate.. Congrats and well done to Jezzabelle and the boys sorting out the horrible mess you had! Cant wait to hear your thoughts when you drive it now!

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 1

Thats a f**ken epic result Pete!

You're gunna be in for a shock now when you drive it on Petrol let alone E85 lol!

Expect near the 500kw zone on E85 mate.. Congrats and well done to Jezzabelle and the boys sorting out the horrible mess you had! Cant wait to hear your thoughts when you drive it now!

Yeah Mate, I knew it was a heap of shit the way it was, and I think this proves it :nyaanyaa:

I think I might start using the seat belt now :woot:

Don't forget your adult diapers as well as that seat belt!

Yeah i always knew it was POS when i saw the dynosheet let alone your impressions of how it drove!

You wont want to get out of it now mate!

Yeah Mate, I knew it was a heap of shit the way it was, and I think this proves it :nyaanyaa:

I think I might start using the seat belt now :woot:

So he changed the turbo rear? Good thinking

No, the PT6266 was on it all the time, it was not the PT6262 that was supposed to be ordered, this was the thing I said I would post at the end, but I waited for someone to see it on the Dyno Graph.

When I posted the pic of the 6Boost being installed I had an email from the old builder saying , oh you might notice the Turbo is a different model, I said yes it was noticed and he said that he told me about this when the build was being done, I said I think I would remember that, he said I might have been pissed, good call but that is something I would remember , well , I would think I would remember, hic hic

But all good as it is a better Turbo for the job on the 3.2 , but not for the 2.6

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...