Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So having got a respectable amount of engine work done I've now noticed that my previously poor fuel economy has managed to get even worse. And I naively thought it would get better with a tune...

So, I thought I'd put it out there to find out if others enjoy just as poor economy as a result of daily driving your modified Skyline.

Car - ECR33 Skyline

Power - 235rwkw, 430 N/m

Kms to a tank - 300 max

Go!

How hard do you drive it? I go through 20L in a 5 minute session at Sandown. :P

I can get down to 10L to 100k's in the evo on e85, the stagea is generally twice that on the open road.

Injectors play a large part, do you know how much of the fuel is being sprayed onto the walls of the ports rather than towards valves? How small are the droplets? Most people would have no idea I guess.

If you were to state your vehicle, then using "per tank" is fine as its consistent.

But ok, lets simplify this then by doing L/100

Which in my case is a shocking 18L/100kms and that's largely putting to and from work.

I think I have to have a word with my tuner as although I have Nismo 740cc injectors, Z32 AFM etc, economy should be much better than that...

Mostly it's going to come down to the right foot. Heavy foot, crap economy.

Your power certainly isn't out of the box, loads of much higher hp cars doing respectable L/100 numbers.

If the car doesn't have cams or adjustable cam wheels it should be pulling a nice manifold vacuum. You'll see a big drop in economy once you alter cam timing/valve overlap.

What's the static compression numbers, won't get good off-boost economy from a low compression engine.

And finally the tune, very few tuners will spend time on the light load points and that's where most of us drive for economy.

I have similar setup to you ausdrift. Making 248rwkw with nismo 740's. Get around 12-13l/100 in grandpa mode and 14-15l/100 driving with a fair amount of right foot. I did ask my tuner to focus on economy. My cruise afr's sit between 14 and 15 to 1. Your car is definitely using too much unless you are constantly on boost.

Edit: That is all around town, start stop driving. Freeway would obviously be much better.

I think i was getting around 15-16l/100km with Nismo 740's and Hypergear SS2. Just put EV14 1000cc's in so thinking economy is going to improve a bit now

The figure i gave for economy was mixed driving. I never manage to do a proper economy run on a tank lol

I'd forget any city figures, it's just not worth the effort.

But a highway test (without crazy RPM overtaking) I'd expect no worse than 10L per 100.

My stock RB26 does 10 highway driving.

I added the trailer and it went 20 to 25. (I couldn't do the 350K trip with my 72L tank)

Car was always on boost, so poor economy.

The Stagea uses 12 - 15L/100km round town with a reasonable amount of boost. Would have to really thrash it to get 18L/100

(km per tank is far too vague as I assume you don't drain the tank each time and the amount left will vary).

The tuner I used is very reputable, and I did emphasis the fact that its a daily and I wanted a smooth reliable driving experience, so I assumed he would have made it good down low too.

On the daily work grind there is little opportunity to get on boost, so I'm almost always driving relatively conservatively. Hence my confusion...

Rb25. cams, modified head, port/polish, hypergear SS2, nismo 740's.

9.7l/100 on 3/4 highway run and 1/4 hills section on the way to work. Get 600km out of a tank and still just off empty. Would guesstimate about 8.5 on highway only

You need some some data on whats going on. Do you have a wideband? What ECU are you running and can you show a timing map?

Just sounds like a combination of being rich and not enough timing where you drive 90% of the time.

Even as an amateur tuner I get better fuel economy than stock. I made sure the open loop map was as close as possible to the target AFRs

Rb25. cams, modified head, port/polish, hypergear SS2, nismo 740's.

9.7l/100 on 3/4 highway run and 1/4 hills section on the way to work. Get 600km out of a tank and still just off empty. Would guesstimate about 8.5 on highway only

That's a great result.

No2 son's 33 would do similarly, I used to worry once 600k's rolled over but it never ran out.

Honestly it's pointless saying xx k's to a tank.

What is your l/100km?

^^^This. I don't know how why it's so hard but kms/tank is so not a useful measure, even if you know the (dry) tank size, as it's never 100% empty or full.

For a useful measure of economy you need to look at l/100km (or MPG), over time.

If you were to state your vehicle, then using "per tank" is fine as its consistent.

But ok, lets simplify this then by doing L/100

Which in my case is a shocking 18L/100kms and that's largely putting to and from work.

I think I have to have a word with my tuner as although I have Nismo 740cc injectors, Z32 AFM etc, economy should be much better than that...

What turbo and how much power? 18l/100kms is not necessarily that bad, depending on context.

Here's some of my figures for comparison (275rwkw @ PULP, Hypergear SS2, 850cc injectors, Walbro 255):

  • Freeway 10-12l/100km
  • City 12-15l depending on traffic
  • Track 20+

Stop-start traffic absolutely kills any economy.

Still, my previous 5.7L cam+heads 290rwkw+ LS1 was north of 20L BP98 in city traffic, so in comparison the Skyline is an econobox :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...