Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Here is the E65 Dyno run ,looking good

E65 Scott.JPG

I have put this in my thread but it might be of interest to those of you that understand, me ?

Just to add something the Tuner said.

I would not read into the dyno response figures at low RPM too much as I had to run at a much higher ramp rate that I would like due to the torque splitting playing havoc on the dyno.  This is very common for GTR’s on dynos when the power output is very high.  The best comparison is to see how long it takes to reach x boost from x boost.  Not just RPM.  I can literally put the foot down and have boost on demand in your car with this turbo.  It is very sharp.

4 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

I have put this in my thread but it might be of interest to those of you that understand, me ?

Just to add something the Tuner said.

I would not read into the dyno response figures at low RPM too much as I had to run at a much higher ramp rate that I would like due to the torque splitting playing havoc on the dyno.  This is very common for GTR’s on dynos when the power output is very high.  The best comparison is to see how long it takes to reach x boost from x boost.  Not just RPM.  I can literally put the foot down and have boost on demand in your car with this turbo.  It is very sharp.

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

2 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

I would assume that's because it is tuned to turbine wheel speed and tapering off boost to keep it under the threshold.

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I'd be more worried about the rpm vs speed relationship and the fact the run wasn't done in a 1:1 gear ratio...

Turning over at 6000rpm?

Can't remember what has been said in here, but the boost peaks and then rolls off - not because the turbo had nothing else in it, but because the brief was more about low down/midrange and reliability as opposed to give it all she's got capn' - as far as I know.    This is definitely not maxed out at any point of the rev range, and I'd say if it had a flat boost curve it'd look less like it rolls over.

Pretty sure it's only around 20psi at peak rpm.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
16 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

I actually believe it was 24 or 25psi tapering off to 20 to keep turbo speeds at 120000rpm. 

yes, 25 to 20 on the E65 runs I think. I asked to day for a graph with the psi details ?

20 on the pump I think , maybe 21

17 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Short test run today , looks pretty good.

As you can see, just starts going at 3K and keeps going

8374 first run after tune.mp4

Looks good, mate!   In 2nd gear it looks like it's got GOOD boost by 3500rpm without trying too hard, and picks up hard when shifting in the 6000rpm range.  

Just running under 3k from to have a look at it and went better from idle in 1st as well, the idle is now 900rpm , not 1200 and hunting :)

I thought it looked pretty tough over 3k , very linear as well.

2 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Just running under 3k from to have a look at it and went better from idle in 1st as well, the idle is now 900rpm , not 1200 and hunting :)

I thought it looked pretty tough over 3k , very linear as well.

Wheels  are you entering a tractor pull contest? 

On 4/5/2017 at 10:20 PM, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Short test run today , looks pretty good.

As you can see, just starts going at 3K and keeps going :)

8374 first run after tune.mp4

Really nice. What are the specs on the engine (I totally forgot).

2 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

Really nice. What are the specs on the engine (I totally forgot).

3.2 Nitto Stroker

HKS Vcam step 2   with UE 260  10.85 Exhaust

EFR8374 , 4" dump into 3 1/2 to tail

8:5 CR

And all the stuff to make it all work together .

I will be giving it my first runaround noon today :)

 

  • Like 1

Had a quick run when the car was dropped off yesterday and could feel the difference without smashing it hard.

I went for a run early this morning and it is a different machine to drive , first I gave it some up to from idle 7500 and it felt like it was hard all the way after 3200 and got there pretty quickly from idle, felt great.

Then I did some changes at 5000rpm and it was on boost through 1,2,3,4 and 5th had to stop

Next I did the same at 4000rpm 1,2,3 and 4th to see what happen, it was just about ready to fly in another 300rpm ish from each change, mad!

You can dive it anywhere in 6th gear in a 60 , 80 or 100kph zone without changing back on any hill , the only time I had to change was on the 35kph bends going up to a step incline , that torque is just so good in a street car , especially if you want to relax a bit

I would say it is very close to 900rpm better while driving it in any gear if you want to get it going. it really starts to get going at 3000 and hard just after that :wub:

From my experience , in my car it smashed the 6266 everywhere as a driving experience.

Happy camper, you bet , it is a great car to drive at any speed and just feels alive everywhere

  • Like 5

That is mega impressive, Not necessarily too surprising but still awesome that it is performing like that and it sounds like something that finally gives you the GTR experience you had been looking for.  Long expensive and frustrating journey at times but finally there!

 

Congrats on building a beast, hope there are many fun drives on The horizon with the new found power, response and general road manners:)    cheers for the update, too!

  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, Lithium said:

That is mega impressive, Not necessarily too surprising but still awesome that it is performing like that and it sounds like something that finally gives you the GTR experience you had been looking for.  Long expensive and frustrating journey at times but finally there!

 

Congrats on building a beast, hope there are many fun drives on The horizon with the new found power, response and general road manners:)    cheers for the update, too!

Thanks mate, it has been a while but I finally got the car going how I wanted it to go and its a fun ride

  • Like 1
53 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

Makes me excited to get mine.

Soon hopefully :(

You will love it :wub:

Paul and Mick could explain it better in car bloke talk, they had 25klm each down a nice bit of driving road, well except for the pot holes , lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...