Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Intake 6 deg advanced. Ex 4 retard. I have tried a few different settings but it always likes 10 deg of overlap the best. Turbo comes on strongest there and makes best overall power band. Did everything from no overlap to 20 deg overlap...10 is best but there are good gains in the 6-10 range if you are worried about idle quality. Also 8 deg intake advance and 2 deg ex retard made similar power. Power drops over 10 deg though.

It will hit 700 whp tonight. I regapped my bcpr8es plugs down to .020" to fight high boost breakup. Yes turbo is really spinning but it's 41 deg F here today so it's still relatively low rpms to move the air.
Boom. Check them digits out. Sucker woke up at 30 psi in the midrange. 26 on top. 20171208_222058.jpg
  • Like 2
American dyno is bloody awesome

I guarantee this car has high 130's if not mid 140's in it. It is flat out scary to drive...recall I ran 128mph on pump 93 (your ron98) on 18-19 psi boost in the 1/4 and it pales in comparison to how it is now. It is an absolute ANIMAL...  

 

 

 

8 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

I guarantee this car has high 130's if not mid 140's in it. It is flat out scary to drive...recall I ran 128mph on pump 93 (your ron98) on 18-19 psi boost in the 1/4 and it pales in comparison to how it is now. It is an absolute ANIMAL...  

 

 

 

You'd wanna be pulling mid 140s to back up 740hp ?

Gunna repeat myself here... But the 8374 is a BEAST of a snail! 

Driven 3 8374 cars ranging from 2.8L - 3.2L and it really makes my tip drip! ?

11 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

I guarantee this car has high 130's if not mid 140's in it. It is flat out scary to drive...recall I ran 128mph on pump 93 (your ron98) on 18-19 psi boost in the 1/4 and it pales in comparison to how it is now. It is an absolute ANIMAL...  

Don't mind me, that was just an observation on the figure differences from Aus VS USA. It wasn't meant to add or detract from your comments. 

  • Like 1

Anyone here got a source on 90 deg compressor covers for the 7670? I thought this was the B2 frame, though it looks like the outlet of the 8374 is 2.5in, and the 7670 is 2in, can't seem to find an "OEM" style fix for this.

Would appreciate something less agricultural than simply welding a 90 degree on literally in a backyard. Given the outlet is VERY close to the 6boost manifold runners Silcon is only going to last so long. So long in this case meaning it died yesterday and I doubt very much that the heat shielding aluminum stuff I put around it is going to keep it alive.

15 hours ago, s2d4 said:

Don't mind me, that was just an observation on the figure differences from Aus VS USA. It wasn't meant to add or detract from your comments. 

Yeah, glad you said that - I start rolling my eyes a bit when people make comments that "If it was a real 700+whp then it'd run xxxmph".... fact of the matter is dynos are just tuning tools and it's not that American dynos are happy, it's that MOST Australian dynos read lower than what pretty much everyone else in the world use unless they have imported a Dyno Dynamics dyno.   740whp sounds about right for high 130mph/around 140mph to me from the Dynapacks that I am used to, and sounds about right for what an EFR8374 is capable of.  I'm guessing if this dyno reads like what I am used to then the turbo will be within safe rpm, JUST.

Nice result, I look forward to hearing how it goes - E85 is awesome, tends to make the car feel better in general ... not just when tracing the target boost curve.  Been good seeing this setup gradually be refined and start showing what the EFR8374 is capable of on a nice RB :)

  • Like 1
On 12/11/2017 at 6:11 AM, Kinkstaah said:

Anyone here got a source on 90 deg compressor covers for the 7670? I thought this was the B2 frame, though it looks like the outlet of the 8374 is 2.5in, and the 7670 is 2in, can't seem to find an "OEM" style fix for this.

Would appreciate something less agricultural than simply welding a 90 degree on literally in a backyard. Given the outlet is VERY close to the 6boost manifold runners Silcon is only going to last so long. So long in this case meaning it died yesterday and I doubt very much that the heat shielding aluminum stuff I put around it is going to keep it alive.

 

not sure if that worked or not ?

link below

efr_vband_comp_outlet_1461.jpg

 

Edited by VFRegal

Run in tune complete on my thing, these turbos are amazing - feels like my old -5 setup but with an extra 200kw and 2psi less boost.

engine spec,

2.8L,

1mm O/S valves,

Tomei sized inlet ports,

CPC carbon plenum matched up to the big ports 

6boost, 60mm turboSmart Gate

Spline drive Tomei Pump

Platinum race engines Block Brace

Race Pace Sump

R35 Coils

Ross Crank Trigger

Haltech 2500 

9180 1.05

26psi 500kw

IMG_0091.jpg

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, Deano 1 said:

Run in tune complete on my thing, these turbos are amazing - feels like my old -5 setup but with an extra 200kw and 2psi less boost.

engine spec,

2.8L,

1mm O/S valves,

Tomei sized inlet ports,

CPC carbon plenum matched up to the big ports 

6boost, 60mm turboSmart Gate

Spline drive Tomei Pump

Platinum race engines Block Brace

Race Pace Sump

R35 Coils

Ross Crank Trigger

Haltech 2500 

9180 1.05

26psi 500kw

IMG_0091.jpg

Awesome graph and power/response! ima sure it would drive better than it looks on paper! (i was also comparing ur graph to my T04z dyno sheet, obviously your EFR has improvement everywhere hahahha)

Ima also looking at upgrades now so may I please ask why 6boost single wastegate instead of twin wastegates? Prob cheaper, but wouldn't twin wastegates be more ideal? 

1 hour ago, Deano 1 said:

Run in tune complete on my thing, these turbos are amazing - feels like my old -5 setup but with an extra 200kw and 2psi less boost.

engine spec,

2.8L,

1mm O/S valves,

Tomei sized inlet ports,

CPC carbon plenum matched up to the big ports 

6boost, 60mm turboSmart Gate

Spline drive Tomei Pump

Platinum race engines Block Brace

Race Pace Sump

R35 Coils

Ross Crank Trigger

Haltech 2500 

9180 1.05

26psi 500kw

IMG_0091.jpg

Looks like it would be mega fun to drive, I wonder if the million dollar plenum was worth the investment. (besides the fact it looks good).

the plenum is deff not worth the investment the amount of work invloved and extra lines and hoses needed to be made/brought to set it up, it should make 500kw in NA form. The plenum's are a waste, Nismo FTW. 

 

I went 60mm single gate, for packaging as theres not alot of room under there for 2 gates. Also the waste gate pipe is split anyway so you get the same effect with the single gate just less mucking around. 

  • Like 2
4 minutes ago, Deano 1 said:

the plenum is deff not worth the investment the amount of work invloved and extra lines and hoses needed to be made/brought to set it up, it should make 500kw in NA form. The plenum's are a waste, Nismo FTW. 

 

I went 60mm single gate, for packaging as theres not alot of room under there for 2 gates. Also the waste gate pipe is split anyway so you get the same effect with the single gate just less mucking around. 

I looked at that option but after my 6Boob experience i chose to go down the path of the HypeEx/Fabtech true twin scroll manifold with twin gates... He performed artwork on it and it all fits pretty well! Going to be a prick to take off over the next few weeks so i can get the engine out for a build.

Will be interesting to overlay the graphs once i get mine running ;)

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Deano 1 said:

the plenum is deff not worth the investment the amount of work invloved and extra lines and hoses needed to be made/brought to set it up, it should make 500kw in NA form. The plenum's are a waste, Nismo FTW. 

 

I went 60mm single gate, for packaging as theres not alot of room under there for 2 gates. Also the waste gate pipe is split anyway so you get the same effect with the single gate just less mucking around. 

Yeah so true 2 gates would be alot more packed and costs more (altho $ doesnt seem like a matter to you =P)

Does the wastegate pipe split came standard in the 6boost single gate???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...