Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

what is your max engine RPM?  and what is your max boost target, 2bar?

for a 2.5L engine at 500ft above sea level,  revving to 7000rpm or 8000rpm, you may want to play around with garrett boost advisor or bw matchbot.  this can help dial in your setup.  youtube videos at the bottom of the bw page.  

If you want to post up a link or a map with plotting points, it is much easier to understand what your operating parameters will be.  Unfortunately aftermarket "upgraded" compressor wheels are typically a mystery and do not have any compressor maps to work from

Thanks Geoff. Yea im expecting max power to fall between 6 and 7k rpm with the headwork and cams I have with the engine speed hard cut to be at or just before 8k rpm. The engine should be able to tolerate 2 or even 2.3 bar boost max if it can be generated efficiently with low back pressure in the exhaust manifold. Compression is low to tolerate the pump fuel here, it was 8.2:1 on the build that melted and it's now just under 8:1, again for more safety.

 

I have had a play with matchbot with the results here.  http://www.turbos.borgwarner.com/go/7D9ZYN

 

If I was to start again, eg make a new manifold, downpipe, oil and water pipes etc I would definitely go with the efr 8374 or perhaps the 84mm compressor version, but I just don't have the time or money to redo all those things hence wanting to stay with a bolt on turbo. I did have an efr6758 and then a 7163 on a road car with the same engine as my quattro, just less aggressive cams and cast manifold etc, and really liked how it preformed. It topped out at 450 and 500 hp respectively on those turbos on the same pump fuel. And that was properly topped out, eg running 2.3 bar though the mid range with boost dropping to 1.5 bar at 7k with the wastgate almost fully closed. Just to give some idea of what it takes on theses engines and our dynos to make that power.

 

Can you confirm if the garret v band sizes are the same as the tial units? I measured the tial unit today to be 2 inch id and 3 inch od.  Would you compare the g35900 to be of similar size and response to an efr 8374? 

 

I agree on your point on the aftermarket compressor.  Its frustrating due to having no map so God knows what it's doing. Maybe a proper gtx3582 gen 2 wheel and housing would be worthwhile and not too expensive.  Cheers.

  • 1 month later...

So today was the day. This is a G25-660 0.92 on a 30+ year old unopened RB26 with unknown kms. Green is my previous tune using factory R34 GTR twins. My tuner seems to think that there would be another 40ish kw in it with e85 on similar boost.

I had the pressure source coming from the comp cover when I probably should have had it coming from the plenum (before throttles) as I did previously. I think this at least contributed to the boost taper. (Hits 18 sofltly and tapers to 16)

This was done with a 6 Boost manifold, 4" dump into a 3.5" system. I don't know how hard he leaned on the gate pressure setting (eBoost Street) but boost response doesn't look overly impressive by these graphs. 130kmph is just under 4500 if the calcs are right (643mm rolling diam tyre, 4.11s, 4th gear 1:1)

I cant stand the waste gate cycling sound that the EBC and the screamer make. It sounds sooooo good on gate pressure with no pulsing so I might be back to sort something out soon.

Peak power was at 8000rpm. Retains factory 8200 rpm limiter

 

 

Inked20200206_221938_LI.thumb.jpg.7b68d6f71bf306a4ed1ca17fca40390c.jpgInkedInked20200206_221907_LI.thumb.jpg.602fa0898c99f80cbb82dce1713a237a.jpg

  • Like 1

I don't like guessing but if I had to I reckon this is partially the result of a bigish turbine housing on an around 54mm turbine .

Yes it flows well but probably at the expense of turbine response down low . Also the standard twins basically achieve the same thing on an I6 as a twin scroll twin gated turbine housing .

I don't think we will realise the true potential of these G Series turbos until Garrett or whoever starts making twin scroll turbine housings for them . V band is a bit nowhere for the mass market .  

This 2.5 STI makes 20 PSI by ~4100 with a 0.72...G25 660 - that kind of puts my result in the ballpark with the bigger housing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoem4Gv06ec&feature=youtu.be

That SR with 400kw was surely using a 0.92 and looks to spool better than both of these setups. Was that on a hub dyno?

Need more examples to gauge what to really expect spool wise on an RB I think

On 2/6/2020 at 7:19 AM, Phat_Toni said:

So today was the day. This is a G25-660 0.92 on a 30+ year old unopened RB26 with unknown kms. Green is my previous tune using factory R34 GTR twins. My tuner seems to think that there would be another 40ish kw in it with e85 on similar boost.

I had the pressure source coming from the comp cover when I probably should have had it coming from the plenum (before throttles) as I did previously. I think this at least contributed to the boost taper. (Hits 18 sofltly and tapers to 16)

This was done with a 6 Boost manifold, 4" dump into a 3.5" system. I don't know how hard he leaned on the gate pressure setting (eBoost Street) but boost response doesn't look overly impressive by these graphs. 130kmph is just under 4500 if the calcs are right (643mm rolling diam tyre, 4.11s, 4th gear 1:1)

I cant stand the waste gate cycling sound that the EBC and the screamer make. It sounds sooooo good on gate pressure with no pulsing so I might be back to sort something out soon.

Peak power was at 8000rpm. Retains factory 8200 rpm limiter

 

 

Inked20200206_221938_LI.thumb.jpg.7b68d6f71bf306a4ed1ca17fca40390c.jpgInkedInked20200206_221907_LI.thumb.jpg.602fa0898c99f80cbb82dce1713a237a.jpg

would you mind reposting your dyno chart with engine RPM as the lower axis?

...and if you are working to optimize the setup, a turbo speed sensor would be immensely helpful here to provide you feedback

3 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

I don't think we will realise the true potential of these G Series turbos until Garrett or whoever starts making twin scroll turbine housings for them . V band is a bit nowhere for the mass market .  

working on it!  may be a little while but making progress.  interestingly Full Race appears to be the only Garrett distributor pushing for this, everyone else just wants vband

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

The lack of data points and proper testing on these turbos makes me really suspicious. 

They show a before and after boost curves with no rpm or road speed line to compare :( 

Plus went a really big housing for the small 2.6 and didn't test the smaller one as suggested. 

 

 

 

I think the point of the video is to show the power it can make but they ran into some issues.  The way youtubers make money is to make it into different parts not one big video.  So that will come no doubt. 

I think the potential is there though.

15 hours ago, Butters said:

The lack of data points and proper testing on these turbos makes me really suspicious. 

They show a before and after boost curves with no rpm or road speed line to compare :( 

Plus went a really big housing for the small 2.6 and didn't test the smaller one as suggested. 

 

 

Agreed.  The driving seemed pretty decent to be fair, and realistically that should be the best indicator but it would have been nice to have seen a pull in a gear where it doesn't go so fast that you can't tell what's happened - 3rd gear with a boost gauge or something that is meaningful when you aren't actually in the car would have been good, but not having that isn't necessarily being dodgy so much as I know myself that it can be hard to remember what will be helpful when you are out thrashing.

The fact that no dyno/boost plot or overlay without calibrated rpm is a LOT more suspicious.  That seems like the obvious thing to share if you are happy with the results, or what you'd omit if you really would rather not show it.

In regards to the smaller housing, Andrew has mentioned a few times on FB that he'd rather they had a bigger turbine wheel - seems a lot like they think exhaust back pressure is an issue and would probably explain why they didn't bother with the 1.01 in the end.

 

2 hours ago, Stixbnr32 said:

I think the point of the video is to show the power it can make but they ran into some issues.  The way youtubers make money is to make it into different parts not one big video.  So that will come no doubt. 

I think the potential is there though.

To be fair, the issues didn't seem to be ones which would affect spool.  The fact that they pushed it hard with the 1.21 with no filter does make it seem like this must be the upper realms of this turbo in a street(ish) setup.

  • Like 1

Hi All

With my current setup (nitto 2.8 and cnc head) i was originally looking to go with a BW9174 or 9180.

I then changed my mind and decided i would go with a PTE 6870 as i did not think the BW would get me the top end i wanted. 

So now with the release of the g35-1050 i am thinking that this might be the turbo for me as it should make more then the BW and have more response then the PTE.

Looking at the video from Andrew, its hard to tell as it does not look as responsive as i would have thought it would be. do you guys think im on the money with putting it between the BW abd PTE?? 

 

CheersNeal  

57 minutes ago, Myskyliner33 said:

Hi All

With my current setup (nitto 2.8 and cnc head) i was originally looking to go with a BW9174 or 9180.

I then changed my mind and decided i would go with a PTE 6870 as i did not think the BW would get me the top end i wanted. 

So now with the release of the g35-1050 i am thinking that this might be the turbo for me as it should make more then the BW and have more response then the PTE.

Looking at the video from Andrew, its hard to tell as it does not look as responsive as i would have thought it would be. do you guys think im on the money with putting it between the BW abd PTE?? 

 

Tbh it's hard to know what to say in response to this as you haven't actually specified your aims.  You've mentioned response, and mentioned power, but not really what you are looking for.   Andrews video really didn't give much info on response, stamping the throttle in 2nd at mid rpm with a car with a sequential gearbox doesn't tell you much.   It didn't seem like a lag monster, but what can you really tell watching a video - especially when the video isn't showing a boost gauge or tacho?

Fwiw from the little I've seen and the fact that he's basically said its laggier than a GTW3884R (which would be lucky to be over 20psi by 5000rpm) and the fact that the pulls in the video start at an rpm and a gear where it's going to rev out reasonably well even with almost no boost initially it's really hard to draw much from, I'd not be surprised if a 6870 didn't give anything perceptible away.

With so little information out I'd be deciding between an EFR9180 or a Precision 6870, both known quantities - the 9180 if you want more response or a 6870 if you want more power.   

People seem to have been having issues with poor quality housing castings with the EFRs so I am dubious of them atm, so the Precision arguably may be the best option - unless you are keen on taking a punt on the likes of a Xona Rotor XR9569S, the family of which seem to be given some epic results.   There are a couple of RBs in Oz due to be running with those in the relatively near future, I'd keep an eye out for results on those as I suspect they could be impressive.

 

 

Edited by Lithium

Hi Lith

 

Thanks for the response. I should have given a bit more information. 

The car is being built as a street car with roll racing in mind, with a 9.9sec pass on some mt as a goal I would like to active. It's not a dedicated drag car as I still want to go for family drives.

I am sticking with a manual (r34 getrag) and 4.1 diffs, so thinking this should help with response. I understand It won't help with the lag situation but once in the right rpm range it should be able to maintain boost. 

One of the other reasons I was looking to go Garrett is the relaiabilty fact. I have a gt3566 custom built thing on my other skyline and it has never let me down. Mind you it is an old Turbo and quality may have changed since 2006. 

I may just have to wait for more results. To male the final decision. 

 

3 hours ago, Myskyliner33 said:

One of the other reasons I was looking to go Garrett is the relaiabilty fact. I have a gt3566 custom built thing on my other skyline and it has never let me down. Mind you it is an old Turbo and quality may have changed since 2006. 

the Garrett quality went up with G-series compared to the older GT - no question about it.  The only debate seems to be about lag/response compared to their legacy turbos.. which will likely continue to be a debate until the G-series divided turbine housings become available

Hi Geoff

I contacted GCG who advised the turbo was on back order (30Days) and i asked how long till the t4 rear would be released as i did not mind waiting. I was told it wont ever be released. 

no sure if this is true but i think GCG would know what is going on.

 

GCG is fantastic, we have a good collaborative relationship with one another.  theyve been at the turbo game for longer than I've been alive. 

Re the G-series ... divided t4 will eventually happen, it may take a year or more.  So don't wait for it.  You can swap turbine housings once they are released if you choose.  Full Race has 1 or 2 G35s left in stock if you or gcg need one.  0.83 and 1.01 a/r 

 

 

1 hour ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

GCG is fantastic, we have a good collaborative relationship with one another.  theyve been at the turbo game for longer than I've been alive. 

Re the G-series ... divided t4 will eventually happen, it may take a year or more.  So don't wait for it.  You can swap turbine housings once they are released if you choose.  Full Race has 1 or 2 G35s left in stock if you or gcg need one.  0.83 and 1.01 a/r 

 

 

Wouldn’t be so bad if it was only just the turbine housing. Need the manifold to suit.

  • 1 month later...
On 3/9/2020 at 5:25 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

the Garrett quality went up with G-series compared to the older GT - no question about it.  The only debate seems to be about lag/response compared to their legacy turbos.. which will likely continue to be a debate until the G-series divided turbine housings become available

Hi turbo noob here, what benefits do the GTX2860R provide over the old hks2530's and do i need tyrion lanniaters hands to fit em in the car?  I would like a responsive bottom and 600hp on the ground along with keeping the twin configuration.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
    • OK, so a bunch of trim needs to come off to get to the rear shock top mounts. Once the seat is out of the way, the plastic trim needs to come off. Remove 2 clips at the top then slide the trim towards the centre of the car to clear the lower clip Next you need to be able to lift the parcel shelf, which means you need to remove the mid dark trim around the door, and then the upper light trim above the parcel shelf. The mid trim has a clip in the middle to remove first, then lift the lowest trim off the top of the mid trim (unclips). At the top there is a hidden clip on the inner side to release first by pulling inwards, then the main clip releases by pulling the top towards the front of the car. The door seal comes off with the trim, just put them aside. The the lighter upper trim, this is easy to break to top clips so take it carefully. There is a hidden clip towards the bottom and another in the middle to release first by pulling inwards. Once they are out, there are 3 clips along the rear windscreen side of the panel that are hard to get under. This is what the rear of the panel looks like to assist:
×
×
  • Create New...