Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking for opinions as I cant make up my mind

R33 GTST 2Dr

Work D9R

FRONT 18x9.5 + 23 OR 18x9.5 +12
REAR : 18x10.5 +23 OR 18x10.5 +15

More so after a "slightly stanced" look & I rather they sit more flush then poke out like a monster truck. all guards are rolled. Liners still in, will remove if need be.

Would love to see your cars if you guys have any photos!

Cheers, Jordzzz...

 

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Anyone running 18s enkai rpf1 8.5 +30 front and 9.5 +38 on the rear of a r33 coupe.

 

Im worried about the brakes clearing

The offsets are what i want just not sure if the rims will clear the calipers. Being wheel specific

 

 

All the rpf1 r33s seem to run 9.5 inch wide on the front but i have knuckles and stock length lcas for drift days so would rather the skinnier wheel

 

 

 

Dont want to run spacers if i muck up the sizes

 

Cheers

Edited by James GT-T
12 hours ago, Adz2332 said:

10.5 +22

How much would the rear have to be pulled to get them under it?

 

quite a bit... this is 10.5 + 12 but using a s14 subframe so extra 5 = 8 mm wider so maybe a + 15mm wider than you want but still

 

 

Ce28rt on car.jpg

Edited by bcozican

 

Skyline model = R33 GTST

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 9.5

Wheel offset = 15

Tyre size = 265/35/18R    245/35/18F

Modifications to fit = 30mm wide front guards and shaved 2mm off the rim to raise offset also ran 245s just to make sure.  Rear has 65mm flares and a 25mm wheel spacer.  Wheel specs are for a r32 GTR

DF60A658-BC10-4672-8A95-48B399133B00.jpeg

211C8242-654A-489A-955A-8E28835C70E5.jpeg

Thought I'd share my setup since there doesn't seem to be much info/examples out there for this particular setup. Perfect for spirited driving on back/mountain roads, not so ideal for daily driving or putting around at 3000 rpm, according to suspension guy. No getting around full lock scrub without invasive mods (rear guard rolling and front guard removal). Otherwise everything fits.

Skyline model = BCNR33

Wheel diameter = 18 in

Wheel width = 10.5 in

Wheel offset = +15 mm

Tyre and size = 295/30/R18 AD08Rs

Modifications to fit = Adjusted suspension. Lower and camber, front and rear. As said above, you will need to run slightly more camber than you would in a street car. 

IMG_20190706_201716.thumb.jpg.ce92293973bae734d2b3b2b93cd04a59.jpgIMG_20190706_202313.thumb.jpg.2eafbce433310aadbda5ad0b58580b10.jpg

IMG_20190706_202118.jpg

Edited by N155@N
  • Like 3
  • 5 weeks later...

 R33 GTR

19x10.5+12 TE37s w/ 265/30 Potenzas

All gaurds rolled, not lowered too much. Scrubs on liners on full lock but otherwise perfect. Fell in love with the wheels the moment I saw them.

60416403_1060088204201359_3943505182955929600_o.thumb.jpg.4bc2418822f57fe5773376cd47845f2a.jpgIMG_20190330_135826.thumb.jpg.937862cc8b6e924d063ce27adeafab94.jpg

 

Work Emotion CR2P 18x10.5+5 w/ 265/35 AD08Rs

Scrubbing on full lock, but otherwise great fitment.

Screenshot_20181227-055953.thumb.png.58d27df957f7d2b6a496943405132718.png

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...