Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI Charlie, going to have a look at Chavey's build, thanks

I see Piggaz is just ordering the OS88 box , cannot wait to hear how they go as a DD and Paul's car should be a good test and I believe he likes to drive hard as he keeps braking things, sorry Paul :)

I dropped my car into the workshop on Tuesday and now the wait starts :(

After listening to you blokes I ended up confirming some changes to the driveline and will see how the Box goes or when it goes before I change it.Better start putting the $$$$s away

Gone with the Coppermix C Spec Twin(over 700HP), Nismo slave cylinder, Quaife front diff , modifying the Trannie and already have a Nismo 2-way LSD /back.

The boys said to try the Unigroup 260 10.8 cams as they will give me more air, Better springs and retainers, cleaning the head up, oversized valves. Staying with the PT6262 B Turbo (over 700hP), maybe a larger back housing depending on the results.

Just waiting to see how the Walbro 460lph goes when the tune is being done and work off the results

RB30 Block has been modified. Plus all of the other part to go with the Nitto 3.2 Stroker Kit to make it a strong motor all round.

Going to have to make it stop now, Piggaz suggested I look at the Endless Brakes as they are strong and still work OK cold for a DD.

While they are doing the job I am having the Haltech Flex Fuel Sensor tuned in with the build , just in case, well you never know what you are going to want in the future, I was happy with the way it was, well for a few weeks ,haha

It will be around 400awkw, no big turbo/s or big cams, response and linear power from the start to the limiter, well :/

all this and no EFR ?

I guess only time will tell how it all works together, the worst option is to change the turbo, then flog it off to get a couple of $$$s back :)

I just hated the idea of changing it, just put it in and it is good for 700HP + and as the was made a huge difference how the car drives, so I want to see how it goes as I could not find a comparison, so I guess I will be the first with the TP6262 on a 3.2 stroker :)

I'd be interested knowing how many people making big hp on a single use WG on the manifold vs WG on turbo housing. Particularly how it results to boost control/spool times/spool response etc.

I'd be interested knowing how many people making big hp on a single use WG on the manifold vs WG on turbo housing. Particularly how it results to boost control/spool times/spool response etc.

Would be interesting but I don't think it will ever happen. I can't see 2 people having an identical setup (except gate position) to compare, or someone swapping gate position just to compare.

  • 4 months later...

I'm uploading my result here. This is a newly developed SAT ATR45 turbocharger. The engine is fully stock, unopened. Using factory cams, and factory cam gears. This is a single turbo, externally gated on E85 fuel. It is pretty good to drive on road.

Power n Response against factory twins:

powervsstock2.JPG

powervsstock.JPG

no, it is pretty high. I think dynopack might be a hub dyno.

If I am reading the last graph correctly the standard turbo(purple?) is at 18psi which is high for a standard turbo.

my race car makes less than that with r32 n1s at standard boost (12psi).

no, it is pretty high. I think dynopack might be a hub dyno.

If I am reading the last graph correctly the standard turbo(purple?) is at 18psi which is high for a standard turbo.

my race car makes less than that with r32 n1s at standard boost (12psi).

Nah 360ish is normal for 15psi on stock R33 GTR turbos, pushing a bit more boost should see what Stao makes.

In saying that, we had a PTE 5858 on a RB25 NEO that was all over that SAT ATR45 on less boost

In saying that, Stao that turbo

I make 261rwkw on 16psi and 293rwkw on 19psi on a chassis dyno from stockers and with a few 125mph passes would confirm that power

So 275rwkw from 18psi seems about right, though I do believe the Dynapack is a hub dyno so that might be low :/

Would like to see a graph using the same boost level though

I make 261rwkw on 16psi and 293rwkw on 19psi on a chassis dyno from stockers and with a few 125mph passes would confirm that power

So 275rwkw from 18psi seems about right, though I do believe the Dynapack is a hub dyno so that might be low :/

Would like to see a graph using the same boost level though

866FE882-D5CD-41AE-9988-94F6E6A306B9_zps

Was waiting for you to say something. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...