Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Add Blah_blah's result. this is from his newly rebuilt RB25det Neo motor working with a large ATR43G4 internally gated bolton turbocharger. It has came a long way of diagnostics and trouble shooting, the end result is:

1016452_629246753806662_1236021066_n.jpg

Car:

R34 GT-T

Hypergear 3582 Tubo

3inch Tbe exhaust

Return flow intercooler

New 460 l/h Walbro fuel pump

Bosch Ev14 ID 1000 injectors

Nistune

Rebuilt engine

Standard fuel rail and regulator

1622751_804351736245854_1333795786_n.jpg

E85 is no more responsive than 98 from my experience. It can allow you to run a smaller turbo for more power with better response though, if that's what you mean...

Nah I must have been misreading stuff because I thought it would also help with response.

Maybe you're getting it mixed up with fatter midrange as you can really pump timing into it at max torque compared to 98RON which knocks when you're generous with the timing.

Add Blah_blah's result. this is from his newly rebuilt RB25det Neo motor working with a large ATR43G4 internally gated bolton turbocharger. It has came a long way of diagnostics and trouble shooting, the end result is:

...

Car:

R34 GT-T

Hypergear 3582 Tubo

3inch Tbe exhaust

Return flow intercooler

New 460 l/h Walbro fuel pump

Bosch Ev14 ID 1000 injectors

Nistune

Rebuilt engine

Standard fuel rail and regulator

382 rwkw, whoa! Well done!!

Do I spot a standard airbox as well? If so, that's unbelievable.

The lower reading is with air box lid on. I've been told having the lid cause a lose of 3psi of boost.

Been working on my new SR turbo this weekend. Knowing the .64 might be restrictive up top, how ever I still want to keep it for its response, so I've grind down a larger exhaust wheel to suit the T28 bearing housing. Below is still the SS1.5 now running a much larger rear.

frontused.JPG

I have also bored out the internal gate to 36mm and used an large 38mm internal wastegate.

rearlarger.JPG

Its currently installed, response wise feel similar to the original version. How ever in upper top range it no longer feels like hitting a brick wall. I'm hopping to maintain the maximum compressor efficiency with lot less boost, while improve mid top range torque.

Holy shit, that GTT is going to be handful on the road! What a crazy result.

It puts on about 250kw in around 1500rpm (3500rpm-5000rpm)....wow....

Me rikee :)

Also, is that loop a pedal or wheelspin?

I'm pretty sure the car is very good to drive.

With the ATR28SS1.5, The overall diameter of the wheel don't necessarily mean it will be laggy, it depending on how much area is provided and the velocity of air when its expanded.

The diameter of the new turbine is 65mm, which is the largest I can possibly fit into that turbine housing. How ever I've grind down the inducer blade height that maintains air velocity when it entering the inducer blade of the turbine wheel, larger exducer blade area creates greater centripetal force, How ever becomes restrictive at high engine rpms. So I have left extra length creating greater exducing area in combination of a large 38mm internal gate.

In fourth gear its making the same amount of boost per RPM on paper so it should be very close to how the original SS15 turbine performs in terms of response. I'm looking forward to the dyno day.

I smsed cat for a time, still waiting for her reply. Hopefully next week. The VCT gear is so hard to find, I bought a 2nd hand one and its noisy as. Nissan Australian wants $960 each with no stock. I ended up bought one brand new from US for $720 delivered. Funny thing is I originally bought a S14 thought there would be heaps of VCT SRs around because they were Australian delivered, but till now every single SR person came in has either a S13 SR or VCT cancelled SR using cam gears. Since my original results are all based on the way it is, I prefer getting the best possible results I could, before applying VCT and E85.

I'm pretty sure the car is very good to drive.

With the ATR28SS1.5, The overall diameter of the wheel don't necessarily mean it will be laggy, it depending on how much area is provided and the velocity of air when its expanded.

The diameter of the new turbine is 65mm, which is the largest I can possibly fit into that turbine housing. How ever I've grind down the inducer blade height that maintains air velocity when it entering the inducer blade of the turbine wheel, larger exducer blade area creates greater centripetal force, How ever becomes restrictive at high engine rpms. So I have left extra length creating greater exducing area in combination of a large 38mm internal gate.

In fourth gear its making the same amount of boost per RPM on paper so it should be very close to how the original SS15 turbine performs in terms of response. I'm looking forward to the dyno day.

I'm sure it's good to drive but to go from a '90s GTI Swift to GTS HSV in 1500rpm would make for an interesting time on the road. 450nm in 1500rpm, too! I imagine traction is a premium when the foot is to the floor. I'd love to see some footage of it on the road or track :)

Similar to my 490rwkws run. When saying fun to drive its more of a "serious fun" at a different level. Its not like smaller turbochargers that runs out of torque at high speed. It pulls like a train over 200km/L in 5th, It feels like the air resistance is tearing every single panel of the car apart, surroundings rushing backwards, a little bit of wind or a tinny bump on the road could send it air born, Not mentioning speed doing 365 degrees turns. If my tyre popes I would be dead :w00t: .

Holy shit, that GTT is going to be handful on the road! What a crazy result.

It puts on about 250kw in around 1500rpm (3500rpm-5000rpm)....wow....

Me rikee :)

Also, is that loop a pedal or wheelspin?

382 rwkw, whoa! Well done!!

Do I spot a standard airbox as well? If so, that's unbelievable.

from 3500 to 4500 looks a little scary

Thanks guys!

Didn't know this was posted till Scotty let me know

Its actually not that scary to drive, can't say I have lost traction once the tyres are warm

It made about 350rwkw with the standard airbox in with a dirty filter.

385rwkw was on a safe tune and boost.

Theres about another 20rwkw in the tune and another 6psi of boost once I 'run in' the car of a while

I found myself comparing your result to 34 GeeTeeTee's result with the FP HTA 3076, and while yours "looks" laggier for the power made (385 vs 391) I was initially disappointed until I realised the 3076 result is running 28-24psi boost vs 22 falling down to 18.

Will be very interesting to see how it operates with more boost wound into it. I'm keen to try mine. Stao please send it to OTR ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...