Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Chasing up a dyno sheet so we can do a little more analysis.

reality is I need stronger wastegates, but the car is just a response monster and it pulls like a freight train, I really don’t need the extra power just yet...especially when a C63 AMG couldn’t hold a candle to this don mega build....

1 hour ago, BakemonoRicer said:

Ben, yes Nismo R1 turbos on the car.

Everyone says they're akin to -7's but that makes no sense, I'm making 30kw more than what people estimated.

They certainly didn't let the Nissan out in this build Benny, because they built it with mostly stock engine components. ProSTOCK build. Even stock ECU ?‍♂️

  • Like 1

Well they put the fruit in the head. But I wish the bottom end was more fruity...

I'm suprised the owner didn't pay the little bit extra to run a set of forged rods......

Scott did laugh at the tune. The japs just love to throw a lot of fuel into it and be done with it.

 

That's about normal boost response for those size of turbos I thought? Especially when you have a half decent head. Remember manifold pressure does not equal lb/min of flow, it just means the turbos have pressurised the intake to that level. What's more important is rear wheel torque at 3900pm or wherever you're wanting to measure from. 

My head was stock, but I had cams and gears and  it made about 20psi at 38-3900 rpm on it's way to 24-25psi, which it almost held to redline. As per my opther comments, the turbos were at their limit and being outflowed, just like yours (mine were newer spec -9s with the better centre cartridge). 

Traffic light grand prix is fun, just don't blow 3rd :D

785nm of torque mate.
Don't want to take anything away from the result but it aint 785nm. Dyno was not set to derived torque which is the accurate at wheel reading on mainlines. Its more like 550-570nm which is still pretty stout.
On 14/07/2019 at 6:17 PM, BakemonoRicer said:

Ben, yes Nismo R1 turbos on the car.

Everyone says they're akin to -7's but that makes no sense, I'm making 30kw more than what people estimated.

You absolutely sure they are Nismo R1 then ? Output of over 350kw at only 20psi on 98ron seems very high does it not ? Also can you tell me how is R1 different than -7 turbos ? The specs supplied look identical to me. If I am missing something enlighten me as I am curious. Also your derived torque is on the bottom graph of your dyno sheet which is clearly under 600Nm as mentioned.

Nismo R1 Turbo: (Specs from RHD Japan)

Compressor Housing: T3 (A/R 0.42)
Compressor Wheel: T3 (Trim 55)
Bearing: Ball Bearing
Turbine Housing: T25 (A/R 0.64)
Turbine Wheel: GT25 (Trim 62)

Max. efficiency: 73%
Max. air pressure ratio (at boost pressure): 103% (1.35kg/cm2)


Garrett 707160-7 Turbo: (specs from Garrett)

Compressor Housing: T3 (A/R 0.42)
Compressor Wheel: T3 (Trim 55) - Ind: 44.5mm - Exd: 60.0mm
Bearing: Ball Bearing
Turbine Housing: T25 (A/R 0.64)
Turbine Wheel: GT25 (Trim 62) - Wheel Dia: 53.8mm

As abov Benny, Derived Torque is different. 

Here's an earlier graph before we finished tuning the car (it only ended up going to 380) and as you can see, and knowing the setup, there's no way it was making a genuine 1000Nm lol 

It was "zippy" but I wouldn't have called it a torque monster, it was only a 2.6 in the end. 

20170522_201505.jpg.305f37c5f5378da8355f9b640c5ba425.jpg

12 hours ago, admS15 said:
13 hours ago, BakemonoRicer said:
785nm of torque mate.

Don't want to take anything away from the result but it aint 785nm. Dyno was not set to derived torque which is the accurate at wheel reading on mainlines. Its more like 550-570nm which is still pretty stout.

am i missing something, it says derived torque on the dyno sheet?

yeah that's right it does show derived torque, just not at 785nm . Dunno where 785nm come from as the derived torque graph clearly shows increments of 50nm vertical blocks, and is labelled as such with 200 at 4th block, 400 at 8th block and has 11 blocks shown. So just under top of 11th block is about 540nm, similar to around what admS15 mentioned. I'm still intrigued at the 356.4kw at wheels on 20psi with 98. I have GT-SS turbos on my 33 which are almost the same turbo as -7 / R1 except with a larger compressor trim of 56 (vs R1 with 55 trim) and I can't get near that.

Usually it dynos at 310 - 330kw on 98ron at 22psi. Runs mid 11s at anywhere between 116 and 120mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...