Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First post here. Also, I've been reading and reading through this massive thread. I can not seem to find a results for the EFR 8374 on any 2.x build. Does anybody know a specific thread page where there are results power-wise for any of the EFR turbos?

 

Edit: Actually, nevermind. I figured out how to search just this specific thread, herpderp. The EFR 8374 looks insane.

Edited by minesskyline
8 hours ago, minesskyline said:

First post here. Also, I've been reading and reading through this massive thread. I can not seem to find a results for the EFR 8374 on any 2.x build. Does anybody know a specific thread page where there are results power-wise for any of the EFR turbos?

 

Edit: Actually, nevermind. I figured out how to search just this specific thread, herpderp. The EFR 8374 looks insane.

There was post in here somewhere of a 8374/1.05 on a built 2.6 tuned by JEM. 30 or 32 PSI by 4100 RPM and made 550 KW.

13 hours ago, Mick_o said:

I know you have an online street tuna certificate but you are seriously the tuna John West rejects that makes John West the best! 

 

13 hours ago, Mick_o said:

HAHAHAHA , that is so funny MIck, I did not know you had a sense of humor . lol

Right :(

6 hours ago, sneakey pete said:

Jesus.

 

Need more data in here, he has a point, there isn't much apart from just people saying "they feel awesome" :P

Yea, this is pretty true actually. I only found one real post so far. And while looking at the compressor map and some of the results from other cars looks pretty good, I think there definitely needs to be more data at this point.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Piggaz said:

There was post in here somewhere of a 8374/1.05 on a built 2.6 tuned by JEM. 30 or 32 PSI by 4100 RPM and made 550 KW.

Yea, I saw that post, but unfortunately it's one of the very few with any results so far on these turbos.

15 hours ago, JH32 said:

So anyway, all arguing aside...

I'm really keen to see the results of this setup as I think it's more representative of what the 'everyday SAU user' could achieve. Stock bottom end, 8374 with 1.05 rear housing, 264 cams, 3.5" exhaust and e85. No RB30 / VCAM etc.

The car is now running

But the tuner is too busy to book it in.... Need to wait around 2 - 3 weeks to book in time for catch can and tune.

and its 256 cams (unfortunately)

The Built 2.6L with 8374 tuned by JEM making 550kw is my mechanics car, who previously had -7s.

He says its even more responsive than the -7s and makes an another ~175kw.

 

 

13918927_10157040937150467_11914063_o.jpg

  • Like 3
To be fair it would be quite good to have more real-world logging of how these EFRs perform, I don't see any issue with what Skidz is saying would be nice to have.  It would have been epic to have had logging  data of the drive we went for in Brett's car, response is subjective while data is data.

Look forward to intune's results and hope some data logs from a well setup and tuned EFR can be caught and shared 



Just tell me what you want. I'll do it when I get back from vacation.

I was just showing overall boost threshold on the street in 2 gears. And yes just shy of 10 seconds to reach 18 psi from only 2k rpms is still real data that may be useful to some.

I think what most of the single EFR supporters are saying is that:
1) A BW 8374 EFR definitely is within the realm of a very driveable street car that is looking to make anywhere 600-800 HP.
2) 8374 will likely beat the very commonly used -5 turbos in spool and response even given their significantly higher max HP capability.

I think these people are correct from data i have seen so far and from driving my own car. In all honesty I think a 7670 is a more direct comparison to the -5s and i think it would paint a significantly different picture for you.

Remember at only 11 psi my car still dyno'd 375 rwhp. On 17 it did 464 on stock haltech base timing. As soon as I get my fuel problem sorted I'm going back for solid 20-21 psi (yes still on 93 octane pumpgas) and more timing advance to see what it does. Does my car beat the -5s in threshold so far on the street? Please provide data for comparison and we will all know. I am pretty sure at 24 psi the 8374 will easily start to walk away from them.

And I'm not taking anything personal at this point. Lots of things I would have done differently on my car so far and I'm still learning, but to lay down fastest time of the day with only 2 runs of the last autox I attended should tell you this turbo is NOT unresponsive.
  • Like 1
7 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

Post 2442 has my first dyno on stock haltech timing map. Also only 17 or so psi. 464 rwhp fyi.

Not sure if it is the site , but I cannot see the Post # anymore :(

Tried to search for post 2442 and this came up again, lol

What page was that on ?

As a complete off topic, wow this new forum software is a complete piece of shit.  I ended up posted that previous nonsense post because the software literally wouldn't let me do anything else until I posted it.  It kept putting me into a page midway through the EFR thread and whenever I tried to post or edit a post it put that text body in and wouldn't let me do anything but "submit reply".  Seems much happier now, but the software is still bloody awful to use even when it's "working properly" again.

Now more on topic, I can't take any more posts where HarrisRacing goes on about his own post without actually posting a link to it and Nismo3.2ish not doing a search... took me about 1 minute to find this (and about 10 minutes to post it due to what the previous paragraph says) :P  There appears to be no dyno plot attached, though I wouldn't rule out the possibility this forum "upgrade" has stripped out any useful data previously posted in this thread.

 

PS. GET OFF MY LAWN!

:P

 

Edited by Lithium

Harris your log starts at 0map indicating at tps of 100% but you really should show tps on logs as manifold pressure can show a lot of boost at 50% throttle on these itb engines.

*Was referring to the 6:45 to just shy of 6:57 which is 12 seconds @ 5th gear log making 18.1 psi.

You will notice the actual time on my logs is way shorter indicating no foul play from brake boosting and the like.

Your 2nd logimageproxy.php?img=&key=4b1e78680f916b86
Try using the same boost points as me so we don't have to mentally interpolate between pressures causing us to guess.

7d62b3ab13c892de538f6eaf578ff60b.jpg


Not sure why image links are broken??
  • Like 1

Every time I read the flame and anger I really want to post that I make 400RWKW at 4100rpm (I do!)

......with a GT35 wheel.

.....with a 3in exhaust with a screamer pipe....

So everything posted in this entire thread is laggy as f**k and must absolutely be shit to drive especially on the street holy shit you peasants.

But in all seriousness everyone's setup seems a little different. There's enough anecdotal evidence from people who have tried other things to say the EFR is as good as it seems and if you want to go top mount and don't fear anyone popping the bonnet then there's not much better to spend money on right now.

 

People getting X result or Y result can be sort of ignored. If you go by the Hypergear thread it's enough to show you that general car setup and sensible mods that people get different results in different things on different cars for god knows why reasons. What truly matters is when people test them back to back, and people going from whatevers to EFR on the same car all go "EFR OMG *jizz*"

Though I am yet to see anyone go from a nice Twin scroll manifold, Twin scroll rear housing, GTX3582 running 35psi and comparing that to an EFR and your power to RPM ratio is gonna be close. After awhile though you are splitting hairs and someone with 190kw in a MX5 has gone around on the outside at the track and is 5s faster so all dick swinging may be entirely moot. :P

  • Like 2

^ one of the closest I've seen is in car footage from Powertune's WTAC car with a twin scroll 6466 to next time with an EFR9180... was interesting watching, I believe it's all on the YouTubes

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
    • Ok, disregard my “rate them” comment, sorry for my unrealistic input
×
×
  • Create New...