Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Use the computer to access the net ffs..

It's like e buying a phone and complaining that it doesnt microwave my food..

That's my point. Pointless stripped down Internet browsing was just an example to demonstrate why a user is more likely to encounter errors on the PS3 or Xbox platform than the Wii. There are less variables to muck around with because you can do SFA on the Wii.

But you know what? If that phone was advertised as having that function, I'd damn well expect it to do that. And seriously, best microwave ever? No more getting up from e couch to heat up food you were too lazy to eat quickly.

Gotta hand it to Nintendo.

After persisting for years with cartridges longer than anyone else.

They then take a massive gamble with the Wii and have a look - IMO it's one of the best consoles of the last 8-10 years.

Nothing, and i mean nothing, will been the N64 - king of the console behind the SNES or the PS1

But the Wii really has never had a problem. You can mod them cheaply and easily, there are some AWESOME aftermarket add-ons... Really good thinking by that mob.

Gotta hand it to Nintendo.

After persisting for years with cartridges longer than anyone else.

They then take a massive gamble with the Wii and have a look - IMO it's one of the best consoles of the last 8-10 years.

Nothing, and i mean nothing, will been the N64 - king of the console behind the SNES or the PS1

But the Wii really has never had a problem. You can mod them cheaply and easily, there are some AWESOME aftermarket add-ons... Really good thinking by that mob.

Word. Long live Goldeneye and Perfect Dark.

And Zelda: ocarina if time.

Ye brilliant game.

Golden Eye was simply the best game EVER for its time. Even now you play stuff like COD etc on PC and the AI isn't that much better, nor is the story line anywhere near as awesome (yes i know its based on a movie).

The "cheat" challenges were also ridiculously fken hard to the point of being genuinely almost impossible!!!

I remember the Silo level achievement clearly (lvl 2 or 3).

It took us (myself & my bro) i think 2 months of solid attempts for hours to achieve the 2min 15sec completion cheat, it was the most difficult of all of them so much that even half a second delay at any point and you'd miss it.

It was childhood euphoria at its best :D

Ye brilliant game.

Golden Eye was simply the best game EVER for its time. Even now you play stuff like COD etc on PC and the AI isn't that much better, nor is the story line anywhere near as awesome (yes i know its based on a movie).

The "cheat" challenges were also ridiculously fken hard to the point of being genuinely almost impossible!!!

I remember the Silo level achievement clearly (lvl 2 or 3).

It took us (myself & my bro) i think 2 months of solid attempts for hours to achieve the 2min 15sec completion cheat, it was the most difficult of all of them so much that even half a second delay at any point and you'd miss it.

It was childhood euphoria at its best :D

Oh man that brings back memories! I can't believe you got it!

That was the hardest thing to get ever in a game. You literally had to run through the whole level perfectly to get it.

That game had the most replay value out of any game I have owned. Literally played it for about 2-3 years on a weekly basis.

Oh man that brings back memories! I can't believe you got it!

That was the hardest thing to get ever in a game. You literally had to run through the whole level perfectly to get it.

That game had the most replay value out of any game I have owned. Literally played it for about 2-3 years on a weekly basis.

Ye you had to be 100% perfect, and even then depending on the spawn of enemies you weren't a certainty to win it lol.

There was a LOT of controller rage over that achievement for many months i can assure you :D

The celebration when I got it was fking hilarious. The parents didnt know what the fk had gone on as there was 4-5 of us at the time screaming and cheering LOL :rofl:

Was certainly the most played console game for me ever! Mario Kart was a close 2nd :teehee:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...