Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I 100% agree with that statement. But "radiant heat" isnt gunna kill diaphragms mate. Its gunna be "operating temps" that kill them as such. 

I guess this is a case where you have to have faith in your chosen product huh? 

 

So while I find the wastegate temperature discussion interesting is it relevant to anyone north of the border? 

All you seem to do is drag race your GTR so heats not a major concern for 9 seconds on WOT at a time.

  • Like 1

So wastegate temps are big in mexico huh? 

Thought you blokes are all too busy staying stock so the cops dont ream your rectums? 

So wastegates shouldn't apply "bcoz not stock" ?

Edited by Mick_o

Any more feedback on the 7670 IWG (0.92) for the RB26? Any boost control problems and if so is there an option to go for the stiff actuator? I'm only wanting high 300kw's. What runner widths do you do at full-race Geoff? Our locals do 35mm which sounds a tad wide for my power levels.

1 hour ago, Griffin said:

That's what I'm looking to put on my 26. Keen to see feedback as well. 380 wkw is a bit boring, is the 7670 too small at this power level?

380 would be getting up there with the 7670. 8374 I would say.

1 hour ago, Griffin said:

That's what I'm looking to put on my 26. Keen to see feedback as well. 380 wkw is a bit boring, is the 7670 too small at this power level?

Why is 380kw boring?

Id honestly challenge you to find a more snappy responsive 380kw than what a 7670 would provide? It would probably be best part of 500rpm more responsive than the the stock twins. Even in T3 open housing form lol ?

On 08/01/2017 at 0:42 PM, burn4005 said:

righto so I've convinced myself to throw the 1.05a/r 8374 I have sitting in my garage on the car and need to work out how the f**k you're supposed to plumb back twin gates without spending a billion dollars on fab work. I need to have the gates plumbed in. that Sinco manifold with the divider plate may be the go... anyone recommend someone in brisbane for exhaust/intake fab work? ive had bad experiences with several workshops in the past so i'm quite shy about who to go to.

I've found the following manifolds:

garage whifbitz: this looks ideal, but the design of the manifold has very different runner lengths and the cars sounds like a WRX. going from an equal length mines pipe, i can't deal with it. unfortunate because it looks very neat.

article_whif.jpg

 

Sydney motorsport engineering/fullrace etc.: these have one gate out the front, but how do you route the piping back to the dump pipe from here? anyone have any pics of what they've done?

MX%20Performance%20RBtwin.JPG[

or this setup: unknown manifold (looks like 6boost) with both wastegate runners pointing backwards (by scotty on this forum I believe)

Twin gates.jpg

I have witnessed the Wifbitz manifold and turbo setup running in a tight time circuit time attack r32. It went like stink! As for the waste gates sounds they are muted. I was just staggered at how the beast ran. 

Does anyone know about the alloy chra 9174? 

Mates car is going to bigger numbers than an 8374 can pump and we have the option of the steel or aluminium chra 9174. Any downsides to running the alloy one as far as reliability goes? Only thing I've seen is you need a new flange kit (80 bucks) to attach the turbine housing to the chra as the softer alloy needs more surface area to grab than the 6 little keepers of the steel one provide, obviously water cooling is a must.

Alloy one will be much lighter too (2.85kg in fact). Factoring in the turbine flange kit the price is the same for both options.

Cheers

Edited by burn4005
Quote

Bill Putnam of UPR piloted his yellow bullet to a new EcoBoost e.t. record of 9.94 at 137 mph. After pushing the envelope of the stock engine and turbo, Bill and Team UPR got serious. They set the new record thanks to the additions of a built short-block from MPR Racing Engines along with Stage 2 cams from Esslinger Racing and an Atmosphere Turbo Kit from Custom Performance Engineering, which features a Borg Warner EFR7670 Turbo.

Not a Skyline but that's one pretty hasty 6cyl Mustang... 

From here: http://www.stangtv.com/news/upr-resets-the-ecoboost-mustang-quarter-mile-record-again/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=upr-resets-the-ecoboost-mustang-quarter-mile-record-again

2017-01-09_19-59-27-640x484.jpg

On 09/01/2017 at 10:11 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

^ I like the runner design, looks awesome... doe it clear all the ancillaries ?

I'll be back home Thursday and reply on this...I hope it does...

On 17/12/2016 at 4:31 PM, Happy Seal said:

7670 sits much better, will have to use a sharp angle for the intake pipe right off the compressor to clear the mount. I'll dig up some pics and post them later. . .

Any chance you can post those pics please mate?

Looks like Im going a 7670 on my RB25 from whats been said, so I need to know how that will sit in my 34GTT low mounted on the stock manifold that I will mod for split to go TS

23 hours ago, Watermouse said:

Any chance you can post those pics please mate?

Looks like Im going a 7670 on my RB25 from whats been said, so I need to know how that will sit in my 34GTT low mounted on the stock manifold that I will mod for split to go TS

Can't find the pics with the engine mounts installed. . .but 1st one is the 8374 and 2nd is 7670. . .much more room to play with. . .

received_10153646055497009.jpeg

received_10153646100942009.jpeg

  • Like 2

Thanks very much buddy, Im sure that will help a few of us ?

 Sooo everyone, my next dilemma is go T3 .83 A/R or T4 .92 A/R with adapter plate, has to be internal gated. Any input would be greatly appreciated?

Its an unopened 25neo that will have ARP 2000 head studs at this stage.

The power bracket Im after is great street response from about the 2,800-3,000rpm mark to 120kph. If Im looking at the wrong turbo please chime in

thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...