Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

^ yep!

then buy proper tyres, a proper LSD, proper suspension arms to fix up the crappy Nissan rear geometry.. If you can't even put 200kW down to the ground, don't bother with power upgrades.

But if you're single pegging everywhere, who cares brah! 300kW uleh.

  • Like 1
On 9/16/2016 at 10:50 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

^ yep!

then buy proper tyres, a proper LSD, proper suspension arms to fix up the crappy Nissan rear geometry.. If you can't even put 200kW down to the ground, don't bother with power upgrades.

The later model 34 GTTs have a Helical Diff yea? Is it worth the upgrade providing this is in a healthy condition? 
I do plan to take her to the track, I'm assuming a true 1.5 way would be better... 

Edited by macca911

For street, a helical is pretty much the nicest diff.

For track, a proper mechanical diff is better.  Especially if you have really high roll stiffness - where you may lift the inside rear wheel off the ground - or if you tend to hit kerbs hard enough to do the same.  Getting a wheel up instantly converts a helical into an open diff.

Also S2 R34 helical diffs are like hen's teeth and if you find one I would prefer you let me buy it.  Or at least the 5 bolt stub axles from it!

Edited by GTSBoy
On 9/16/2016 at 1:53 AM, hypergear said:

lets say. I can get you 3582's power with better then 3076's response. and much cheaper in price.

Hypergear, I'm listening... Would this be something like the Atr45sat?
Internal or external gate? 

Cheers,  

Thats the latest ATR45SAT RV2 model in ceramic ball bearing center. Is maxed at 330rwkws on 22psi p98 fuel internally gated Bolton, 20psi by 3650rpm, unopened neo motor.  Run that externally gated e85 it will be making around 400rwkws region. Check my fb or dyno sheet section for result.

  • Like 3
  • 1 year later...

Gents,

It's been some time since my last post. 
The car has been finished and it made a super responsive 625rwhp and 680nm (e85)

I went with the following setup: 

  • JHH Built RB25 Neo 
  • EFR BW 7670 1.05 TS
  • 6boost Manifold with twin gates.
  • 2000cc Bosch Injectors
  • Haltech Platinum Pro
  • Hypertune Plenum + TB 
  • PWR Intercooler and Oil Cooler

I can't recommend GT Auto Garage at Slacks Creek enough.
Their attention to detail in both fabrication and tuning is fantastic!  

Still running the stock gearbox...

 

Cheers, 

  • Like 3

It turns out every car I drove after mine felt like an absolute dog.

The EFR smashes the GTX3071 in every aspect.

I have unrealistic expectations for response it would appear relative to 100% of RB's ever built. I would assume that a 2.5 with a 7670 would be laggy, or at least laggier than mine. Still going to be better than anything else bolted to a 2.5.

The result does backup my thinking on the matter, that the 7670 is actually a pretty big turbo and is more a 450kw turbo than a 350kw turbo that people seem to consider it to be. Would be curious to see if there is speed sensor data as 466rwkw is really up there.

On 7/3/2018 at 12:04 PM, macca911 said:

Gents,

It's been some time since my last post. 
The car has been finished and it made a super responsive 625rwhp and 680nm (e85)

I went with the following setup: 

  • JHH Built RB25 Neo 
  • EFR BW 7670 1.05 TS
  • 6boost Manifold with twin gates.
  • 2000cc Bosch Injectors
  • Haltech Platinum Pro
  • Hypertune Plenum + TB 
  • PWR Intercooler and Oil Cooler

I can't recommend GT Auto Garage at Slacks Creek enough.
Their attention to detail in both fabrication and tuning is fantastic!  

Still running the stock gearbox...

 

Cheers, 

Very nice!  Can you please share the dyno plot?  The peak power is solid, but not the most interesting part of that setup :)

Kinkstaah Unfortunately I don't have a speed sensor installed. It's coming... 
I have to agree, it must be pushing the limits!! 

KiwiRS4TIt wasn't intentional... I've now got concerns for the gearbox etc... Matter of time haha.  

E85 run attached. I believe the dip at 5400 would be VVT... Please correct me if I'm wrong. 
Unfortunately, I'm in the US and only have the 625hp/640nm run photo on me. You'll get the idea though.
The final power run video is on the GT Auto FB page. 

As always, bugs to iron out and more mods to do.
At this stage, I've planned as far as brakes and an accusump setup in the coming weeks... 

 

IMG_5005.JPG

33092266_10156193311026399_823423248724131840_n.jpg

  • Like 1

I would log your RPM vs. time, I wonder if the VCT turning off is causing some form of timing belt slap/vibration thus causing the CAS to spaz out.

That would explain the harsh dip

  • Like 1
52 minutes ago, macca911 said:

E85 run attached. I believe the dip at 5400 would be VVT... Please correct me if I'm wrong. 
Unfortunately, I'm in the US and only have the 625hp/640nm run photo on me. You'll get the idea though.
The final power run video is on the GT Auto FB page. 

As always, bugs to iron out and more mods to do.
At this stage, I've planned as far as brakes and an accusump setup in the coming weeks... 

The dyno run attached does look quite a bit like it could be VVT turning off too early, I'm assuming that's sorted now?   

Saw a post on NZ Wiring's workshop page of a very similar setup/workshop which upgraded to an NZ Wiring CAS setup on an RB25 Neo recently, wasn't you by any chance?  Very solid delivery for an RB25 making that kind of power, though.  Should be a fun drive :)

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, Lithium said:

The dyno run attached does look quite a bit like it could be VVT turning off too early, I'm assuming that's sorted now?   

Saw a post on NZ Wiring's workshop page of a very similar setup/workshop which upgraded to an NZ Wiring CAS setup on an RB25 Neo recently, wasn't you by any chance?  Very solid delivery for an RB25 making that kind of power, though.  Should be a fun drive :)

Nah, not me. I'll take a look though! 
Not sorted yet... Mainly due to work commitments. I'll aim to spend some time on it starting next week.

Edited by macca911
3 minutes ago, macca911 said:

Nah, not me. I'll take a look though! 
Not sorted yet... Mainly due to work commitments. I'll aim to spend some time on it starting next week.

(y) This is the post that got my attention btw: https://www.facebook.com/nzwiring/photos/a.263208990533912.1073741827.263205613867583/915378341983637/?type=3&theater

  • Like 1

big power, noisy valvetrain and Nissan's high resolution optical sensor (CAS) never works out well haha

VCT "shouldn't" be giving you a massive dip, I dare say (without any data) that there may be triggering issues

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...