Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So finally got the car retuned on the new setup. Went from a gtx3584rs 1.01 to a G42-1200 1.01.

so have driven a couple times now and in honestly have to say I’m impressed. It feels just as laggy as my old setup considering how big it is. 
 

final numbers were;

1011hp (753kw) @ 37psi e85
923hp (688kw) @ 35psi e85 (high boost)
753hp (561kw) @ 24psi e85 (low boost)
685hp (510kw) @ 20psi on BP98

 

 

 

41A966A6-B9F7-451B-8EA3-3FFBAA51D902.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/12/2021 at 9:57 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

g35 is a big turbo.  i feel like the naming is off because it acts more like a gtx40-gtx42 frame size

On 7/13/2021 at 12:46 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

the g30 spools like a gtx3076, with HP and airflow in the Gtx35 size range.  They are impressive turbos, but the naming and nomenclature is a little confusing, if it was up to me G25 would be called G30, G30 would be called G35, etc

Can you clarify on this some more?

Are you saying the Name vs HP rating that all the turbos should be bumped up to the next class?

G35 should be gtx40XX due to g35 power output?

the G series is more efficient so at least the g30-770 = gtx3076

why wouldn't the g35-900 = gtx3582?

 

I am on the fence of g30-900 vs g35-900

Built RB25 stock cams 6-700whp goal pump 93 Street car

willing to sacrifice some spool time (~500rpm) 

If the power delivery is better /linear for g35

Edited by Rand0b

Same boat for me, I snatched a G30-660 supercore for my RB20, still trying to decide between .61 and .83 A/R, I was vouching for the .83 but the comment of geoff about the G series liking the small A/R more is confusing me.

 

On 4/14/2022 at 11:25 AM, Rand0b said:

the g30-770 = gtx3076

why wouldn't the g35-900 = gtx3582?

I am on the fence of g30-900 vs g35-900

Built RB25 stock cams 6-700whp goal pump 93 Street car

willing to sacrifice some spool time (~500rpm) 

If the power delivery is better /linear for g35

theres a lot to consider when picking a turbo!  compressor diameter to turbine diameter ratio is something i think about a lot aka "match ratio".  traditional match ratios might be 1.07 to 1.11 for OEM turbos (or borgwarner turbos for that matter).  In comparison the garrett GT and GTX turbos had aggressively sized "large" compressors on fairly small turbines. 

GT3076 = 76mm compressor : 60mm turbine (1.26 ratio)
GT3582 = 82mm compressor: 68mm turbine (1.20 ratio)

now that the G series redefined what a given turbine or compressor diameter is capable of flowing, i suggest the thinking around wheel sizes might also change.  This is why the G35-900 (1.11 ratio) might outperform the G35-1050 (1.20) and the G30-770 (1.18) might outperform the G30-900 (1.26 ratio).  this gets complicated by which turbine wheel and housing are being used, on what exhaust manifold and engine configuration.  

to your question: 

G30-770 in old garrett = G3071
G35-900 in old garrett = G3576

for a built 2.5L RB25 targeting 600-700whp you could pick a range, 600?  or 700.  twinscroll G30-770 would be my vote for 550-600.  G35-900 would be a recommendation for 650-700. 

On 4/17/2022 at 1:54 AM, R_34 said:

Same boat for me, I snatched a G30-660 supercore for my RB20, still trying to decide between .61 and .83 A/R, I was vouching for the .83 but the comment of geoff about the G series liking the small A/R more is confusing me.

 

RB20s aren't stellar at spool up and torque generation and G30 turbine flows a ton.... so whatever you can do focus on generating a broad useable powerband, getting the turbo online in the least amount of rev's is usually a net positive.  focusing on dyno HP is usually ego measuring contest.  just my opinion (most people on the internet disagree with me fwiw)

  • Like 2
On 19/04/2022 at 10:48 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

for a built 2.5L RB25 targeting 600-700whp you could pick a range, 600?  or 700.  twinscroll G30-770 would be my vote for 550-600.  G35-900 would be a recommendation for 650-700. 

RB20s aren't stellar at spool up and torque generation and G30 turbine flows a ton.... so whatever you can do focus on generating a broad useable powerband, getting the turbo online in the least amount of rev's is usually a net positive.  focusing on dyno HP is usually ego measuring contest.  just my opinion (most people on the internet disagree with me fwiw)

I only disagree with you when you're wrong ;)

So in the spirit of that, I'm going to back up your sentiment here.   I'd use the .61a/r hotside on a G30 660 being matched for an RB20.  

While we're agreeing - also relating to your early comments regarding turbine vs compressor matches etc, this is a thing I've long bashed my head in conversations with people online about - people see a specific A/R that works in an application and decide that is IT.  Same with turbine vs compressor size, and generally assuming that they know how a turbo is going to behave from the turbine size.   Even when I knew comparatively F*all about turbos (and I still have way too much to learn) it was pretty obvious to me that aero is going to influence this, as with the dynamic between the compressor and the turbine.  As I've learned more I've only grown to further appreciate this.  

If someone chose a 1.01a/r v-band G35-1050 over a 1.05a/r EFR8474 because the G35-1050 (G8468 if you're going to refer to it with Borg nomenclature) expecting a significantly more responsive/spooly turbo that has a more restrictive hotside then they're going to end up with something a little different to what they anticipated.  Broad rules of thumb based off previous experience can work, but then there are times they will lead you WELL astray - depending on the setups.   Like even the same turbine housing/wheel combination can perform significantly different in terms of what it can sensibly support depending on the compressor it is matched to.

 

  • Like 2
On 19/04/2022 at 8:48 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

for a built 2.5L RB25 targeting 600-700whp you could pick a range, 600?  or 700.  twinscroll G30-770 would be my vote for 550-600.  G35-900 would be a recommendation for 650-700. 

 

Would you run the G30-770 with the T4 1.06 twin scroll housing instead of the .83 V band on a built RB25?

On 4/18/2022 at 6:48 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

theres a lot to consider when picking a turbo!  compressor diameter to turbine diameter ratio is something i think about a lot aka "match ratio".  traditional match ratios might be 1.07 to 1.11 for OEM turbos (or borgwarner turbos for that matter).  In comparison the garrett GT and GTX turbos had aggressively sized "large" compressors on fairly small turbines. 

GT3076 = 76mm compressor : 60mm turbine (1.26 ratio)
GT3582 = 82mm compressor: 68mm turbine (1.20 ratio)

now that the G series redefined what a given turbine or compressor diameter is capable of flowing, i suggest the thinking around wheel sizes might also change.  This is why the G35-900 (1.11 ratio) might outperform the G35-1050 (1.20) and the G30-770 (1.18) might outperform the G30-900 (1.26 ratio).  this gets complicated by which turbine wheel and housing are being used, on what exhaust manifold and engine configuration.  

to your question: 

G30-770 in old garrett = G3071
G35-900 in old garrett = G3576

for a built 2.5L RB25 targeting 600-700whp you could pick a range, 600?  or 700.  twinscroll G30-770 would be my vote for 550-600.  G35-900 would be a recommendation for 650-700. 

RB20s aren't stellar at spool up and torque generation and G30 turbine flows a ton.... so whatever you can do focus on generating a broad useable powerband, getting the turbo online in the least amount of rev's is usually a net positive.  focusing on dyno HP is usually ego measuring contest.  just my opinion (most people on the internet disagree with me fwiw)

My choice was G30-900 or G35-900 not the g30-770

While the G30-770 may out perform the G30-900 it would not have the same HP potential

With a Stock block w/bolt ons Street car

EVERYONEs choice seems to be the 3076 for ~4-500whp and retains great spool / drive ability

So that's why i was thinking G30-900 just to get a bit more power potential but what factor would cause one to move to the G35-900?

i know it would have a shift in power band and spool

just have not seen to many RBs running these G series turbos for comparisons

I am building this for a Great Street car

I have a Built Bottom end, FFP, Ported head and Stock cams and T3 for my Turbo Manifold

if i see anything 6XX or maybe even 7XX on the dyno i would be happy

IF the G30-900 acts like 3076 but can put down more power i think thats my go to.

But if the G30-900 is to 'small' and hits to quick i could possibly adjust Boost curve in the tune

Or when would the G35-900 be better suited

 

 

 

Edited by Rand0b

@Lithium

I just came across your thread below and looked interesting.

i know the SX-E is older technology but for G Series being over double the price

with the RB30/25 hybrid running the s362 i would think for my goals on RB25 i would need a step or 2 higher and with the extra cash saved i could get some drop in cams

what would your input be on a S366 for my setup? or comparable

With this not being a Full Effort Race/Track setup i think this may be another contender

 

On 21/04/2022 at 8:48 AM, Rand0b said:

@Lithium

I just came across your thread below and looked interesting.

i know the SX-E is older technology but for G Series being over double the price

with the RB30/25 hybrid running the s362 i would think for my goals on RB25 i would need a step or 2 higher and with the extra cash saved i could get some drop in cams

what would your input be on a S366 for my setup? or comparable

 

If you want to get into specifics relating to the Borgs then put your questions in the Borg thread.

Re: Power targets, make it specific here or in there as well.  In this thread you've mentioned 600-700whp, we made 650+hp without maxing out the S362SXE.   It's an easy 600+whp turbo, so any further posts in here relating to G-series or in the other thread relating to Borg try and clarify why you believe you may need bigger than x turbo or whatever.   Mention what fuel you'll be using etc as well. 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

Has anyone seen results from a g40 on an rb25-30 yet? Had a mate ask me about it the other day and I wasn’t much we could find on the topic. Looking at the wheel and housing sizes looks like it would be pretty good on a 3.0/3.2 or even a 2.8 if you used the smallest housing 

  • Like 1

I dont know many people using the G40.  but its one of the most impressive modern 1000hp capable turbos.  people seem hesitant on them and I'm not sure why.  Fact is, G40 has outstanding wheels, great housings and modern connections.  If i were building a beast of a large displacement RB engine, G40 is the turbo I'd run

a friend with a high end porsche shop did a back-to-back-to-back thats sorta relevant here - 991TT, 4.1L, 38psi boost,
 

991-6466-g35900.thumb.jpg.d3c8eddeff2b5371584d6175a4646d8b.jpg

Precision 6466 0.82 a/r (red) vs G35-900 0.83 a/r(blue)

991-6466-g35900-dyno.thumb.jpg.5d8bfc4f1ba7f9d982bdb99021e2a9cf.jpg

 

made me fall in love with the G35-900

  • Like 3
On 3/8/2022 at 10:49 PM, Full-Race Geoff said:

I dont know many people using the G40.  but its one of the most impressive modern 1000hp capable turbos.  people seem hesitant on them and I'm not sure why.  Fact is, G40 has outstanding wheels, great housings and modern connections.  If i were building a beast of a large displacement RB engine, G40 is the turbo I'd run

a friend with a high end porsche shop did a back-to-back-to-back thats sorta relevant here - 991TT, 4.1L, 38psi boost,
 

991-6466-g35900.thumb.jpg.d3c8eddeff2b5371584d6175a4646d8b.jpg

Precision 6466 0.82 a/r (red) vs G35-900 0.83 a/r(blue)

991-6466-g35900-dyno.thumb.jpg.5d8bfc4f1ba7f9d982bdb99021e2a9cf.jpg

 

made me fall in love with the G35-900

Wow. That’s an amazing result. Do you know if it was a gen 2 6466? I was at a cross roads with my turbo choice. Ended up going precision. All the results I saw at the time when I was in the market showed that Garrett had slightly better spool but precisions made more power. Since the goal of my car was drag/roll with some street/cruise duties, I chose power. Having said that, G40 and G45 weren’t out yet. 
 

amazing result none the less. Great post to. 

On 2/8/2022 at 7:59 PM, r32-25t said:

Has anyone seen results from a g40 on an rb25-30 yet? Had a mate ask me about it the other day and I wasn’t much we could find on the topic. Looking at the wheel and housing sizes looks like it would be pretty good on a 3.0/3.2 or even a 2.8 if you used the smallest housing 

Considering how well the G45 did in the motive GTR, I think the G40 would be an animal in a 3.0L RB no matter what head is on it. 

Looking at the sizes of the g40/42/45 range you can see exactly who the main competitor garrett were trying to chase is. Be interesting once a few more started being fitted

i did see one post of someone who swapped a gtx3584 for a g40 1150 and said he found it had better response and Clintoz on here said the same going from a 3584 to a g42

On 04/08/2022 at 12:57 PM, r32-25t said:

Looking at the sizes of the g40/42/45 range you can see exactly who the main competitor garrett were trying to chase is. Be interesting once a few more started being fitted

i did see one post of someone who swapped a gtx3584 for a g40 1150 and said he found it had better response and Clintoz on here said the same going from a 3584 to a g42

I'm really keen to see more results of G40s, so far I've been far from impressed with them but would like them to be a good thing.   On paper they always seem QUITE laggy, though the owners sound happy with what they've ended up with... whether it's a transient response thing or they just don't mind a lazy turbo is hard to know due to subjectivity.   I do know that G42s can ggf from everything I've seen regarding them, they do the numbers but their EMAP seem high for the lag and general flow you end up with for a "modern" turbo.... so if anything this post makes it sound like GTX3584RS are absolute nuggets of turbos.   

On 04/08/2022 at 2:49 AM, Full-Race Geoff said:

I dont know many people using the G40.  but its one of the most impressive modern 1000hp capable turbos.  people seem hesitant on them and I'm not sure why.  Fact is, G40 has outstanding wheels, great housings and modern connections.  If i were building a beast of a large displacement RB engine, G40 is the turbo I'd run

Precision 6466 0.82 a/r (red) vs G35-900 0.83 a/r(blue)

991-6466-g35900-dyno.thumb.jpg.5d8bfc4f1ba7f9d982bdb99021e2a9cf.jpg

 

made me fall in love with the G35-900

Yeah the G40 *seems* like it should be a good thing, if you have any real world results or anything I'd be super keen because I've been more than disappointed with what I've seen so far - I'm not hating, as obviously "disappointment" suggests I was expecting more from them.... I just like keeping abreast of what works and what different units strong and weak points are :)

The G35 900 result is *really* surprising for me, was there any other changes involved on that setup?  A 6466 is not a lazy turbo and a G35 900 is not a super early boost threshold turbo normally - like not bad, but this is unexpected.      We have a G35 900 for a 2JZGTE drag car (900kg car....) so quite interested to see first hand how it performs.

On 8/2/2022 at 9:59 PM, r32-25t said:

Has anyone seen results from a g40 on an rb25-30 yet? Had a mate ask me about it the other day and I wasn’t much we could find on the topic. Looking at the wheel and housing sizes looks like it would be pretty good on a 3.0/3.2 or even a 2.8 if you used the smallest housing 

I am going G40-1150 on my RB25/30 Neo. 1000 at the wheels is my goal which is a big ask but see how we get on. 

ETA in my brain ~6 months
ETA in actuality ~2 years

 

EDIT: 1.06 Vband turbine housing

Edited by iruvyouskyrine
  • Like 4
On 5/8/2022 at 9:14 AM, iruvyouskyrine said:

I am going G40-1150 on my RB25/30 Neo. 1000 at the wheels is my goal which is a big ask but see how we get on. 

ETA in my brain ~6 months
ETA in actuality ~2 years

 

EDIT: 1.06 Vband turbine housing

I feel your pain about inflated eta times at the moment

should be interesting to see, any reason why not going for twin scroll?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...