Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Roughly what size turbo is that? Keeping in mind that it is going on an RB20. Only wanting absolute max 250ish kW to keep response as best as possible.

10 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Roughly what size turbo is that? Keeping in mind that it is going on an RB20. Only wanting absolute max 250ish kW to keep response as best as possible.

Yes can build u an atr43g2 in cbb model for rb20det, that will be responsive and max towards 250rwkws regions

Stao what version of the Atr45 do i have? i got it in dec 2013.

is it even worst then the 1st rev of the atr45sat?

 

do you have a graph that compares my old one to the newest?

 

And how much to upgrade or change to the latest?

  • Like 1

The ATR45 is a 3582 equivalent in .82 rear. It's good size turbo for a 3L bottom. The new one is a very different turbo and nothing interchangeable. Best sell that and we can build you a ball bearing one new from scratch.

On 9/16/2016 at 5:20 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

extremely funny looking graph :)

Yep, Seems the engine had broken ringland's at the time thanks to a bad 'run in tune'

Had no signs or anything obvious until after this tune. (different tuners)
 

  • 2 weeks later...
New version is a very different turbo.

Thanks Stao. Is if possible to build the new SS2 to the old dimensions so that it's a drop-in replacement?

I think Johnny said you need to adjust and rotate the dump a bit to accommodate the new one.

When Tao and are selves put Are heads together and come up with the 6765 , bb core t4 split pole rear ! This should de an animal on the new set up ! 

Big thanks to hypergear as usual 

stock Rb25 turbo for comparison 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

  • Like 3
29 minutes ago, 4bidn1 said:

I should really put my glasses on before typing on my phone ?. 

Thats not even English 

Lol...did you use talk to text?  Makes sense then being you're from Radelaide.  I'm going to call you Christopher Pyne from now on :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...