Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm using an AEM UEGO as well. Thing is, I'm not totally confident it is 100% accurate. I have a feeling it might read a bit rich, otherwise my tune is extremely rich. Frequently seeing ~12.5 on cruise. But I need to ask my tuner to check how accurate it is next time it goes on the dyno.

That said, I'm otherwise happy with the AEM. I've just finished wiring it into my G4 expansion harness which was very straight forward. The Zeitronix kit looks the goods as well though!

Mine seems to be pretty accurate and very responsive!

I use Innovate MTX-L, appears to be a tiny bit laggier than my old Innovate LC-1.

I installed a AEM UEGO on Phil's S15 not long ago and they seem pretty good in terms of response, however his is mounted a little closer to the exhaust housing of the turbo where as mine is mounted pre cat.

so where is the point of difference in all these products?

the sensors will be quite similar yeah? just bosch units or what-not? is the difference in the controller bit? i thought all we want it to do is send an accurate AFR and that's it and let the ECU handle the rest?

if you are aussie there is no reason why you should not use the techedge. you don't even have to buy the display with it which makes it cheaper.

been using them for years, and i own 2 units now. cannot fault them at all. I even had a issue with the long sensor cable and he was nice enough to replace it for me for free when it was not really even covered under warranty and the turn around time for the repair was only 2 days.

all parts and cables are available to purchase seperatly, so you don't have to buy a whole new wideband sensor if you destroy the power cable or the wide band cable.

all he does and all he has ever done is build wideband meters, no one knows as much about wide band as this guy.

cannot beat that shit.

Yep I splashed out on a TE WB3A2 and all manner of cables and adapters a few years back . It has all kinds of logging abilities most of which I'll never use . It's wired into a Vipec plug in nowdays and works really well . The only thing I ever did was drop it in to TE in Canberra to adapt it to their current fastest I think Bosch LSU 4.9 probe . It heats up faster than the one it came with and my tuner requested a new probe when the plug in was fitted and tuned .

If you only want an 02 input for your computer you can buy them cheaper and not pay for features you aren't using . I use the small LCD display so I know what's going on when the lap top isn't online .

I'd buy Tech Edge again , cheers A .

Yep I splashed out on a TE WB3A2 and all manner of cables and adapters a few years back . It has all kinds of logging abilities most of which I'll never use . It's wired into a Vipec plug in nowdays and works really well . The only thing I ever did was drop it in to TE in Canberra to adapt it to their current fastest I think Bosch LSU 4.9 probe . It heats up faster than the one it came with and my tuner requested a new probe when the plug in was fitted and tuned .

If you only want an 02 input for your computer you can buy them cheaper and not pay for features you aren't using . I use the small LCD display so I know what's going on when the lap top isn't online .

I'd buy Tech Edge again , cheers A .

yeah i got the 3A2 as well, had it since 2007 i think... its still going strong. its got the usb interface. its been dropped, wet, left in 55deg + heat for days on end and its still going strong.

I also go the basic 2j2 unit.

if you want a good unit for tuning cars then grab 3a, if you just want one for one car the 2j2 works great.

these things are rock solid, why bother with the seppoes crap ? you dont use AEM computers why use AEM wide bands ? its just silly.

I got this depo gauge...seems all right has Bosch sensor..

Started reading lean, turns out my fuel filter needed replacing...replaced fuel filter now wideband reads error...tried to calibrate it but no response..:unsure:

Pretty sure sensor is still fine , if unit is dead can I just get the techedge so I can link it to my adaptronic?

I seem to misplace a bookmark about wb testing, AEM was at the bottom in terms of how fast it reads and accuracy. A .01 difference compared to LC1 and the other brands that was tested. I had an LC1 first unit was DOE got a new one and it worked peachy.

Im going to try and google n see if I can find the article.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...