Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G30 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30turbineflowmap

 

G35 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35turbineflowmap

The compressor flow chart :

 

770 :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30-770comp-map

 

The 900 one :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-900comp-map

 

and finally the 1050 one :

 

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-1050comp-map

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

6 hours ago, R_34 said:

 

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

Understood, and very much appreciated - thanks for sharing - that's awesome.

I'm pretty confident they are legit, btw.  Just probably weren't meant to be released yet

I've had a quick play with that data, and if I am looking at it right - the 1.01a/r G30 hotside is very comparable to the 1.05a/r EFR8374 hotside which puts things into perspective.


The .83a/r G30 hotside falls slightly short of the .82a/r GT35 hotside in flow.   I think Garrett have chosen some very nice spread of options with this range.

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/04/2019 at 4:41 PM, Phat_Toni said:

The g25 660 with the 0.92 looks comparable to the GT3076r but seems to have the edge in turbine flow, compressor flow and spool. 

g25 660 0.92 from ATS 

6boost mani

 

I saw a post on Sinco NZ's Instagram page which made me think of you, how is your build going?  Did you end up going Sinco for the manifold or is there someone else doing similar?

image.png.676e27afa0879be80102e5c2f3a98f37.png

1 hour ago, Skylineusa said:

This page is gold with great information. Thank you guys! Would running twin 550 be a worthwhile combo? 

That's a very open ended question.  For what power target and on what kind of setup??  Do you have the budget and inclination to do all the fabrication to do twin 550s? (it's not something you'd do on stock manifolds/location). 

It is the kind of setup which to justify would need a pretty solid engine spec, basically its a 1000hp turbo setup so expect the kind of lag that would come with one and expect to need to do the kind of engine and transmission development needed to support it.   If you are looking at making the typical kind of power that people go for with low mount twins then no, imho it is not worth doing.

5 minutes ago, Phat_Toni said:

I think this car was mentioned earlier in the thread. Gives a good idea as what to expect from 2 of these things....

 

It's worth nothing a couple of things he says which contradict each other, he implies it spools 500rpm better than the EFR9180 but then also says its all in between 6000-7000rpm which on a 2.8 is... umm... much laggier than any EFR9180 I've heard of.

It's been previously said that it's got a 500rpm wider powerband as the 660s hold on (unsurprisingly) to much higher rpm than the EFR9180 and other turbo setups they ran on it, so if you are willing to rev it to 9000+rpm then it offers the potential to give a broad delivery - as long as you aren't hoping for things to happen earlier in the rev range.

Be great to get some more data points from that car.  

 

The twin G25-550 intrigues me as well.  They do the internal gate T2 .49 which screams bolt me on an RB26.

I've be told by a seller its not a bolt on affair though. I was not given any details other than you have a 30 year old car "dude" as to why. 

The cost of them makes it a serious investment and a risk you end up with a street pig.

If not and they make 900-1000fwhp with amazing spool  ..... all the glory is yours  ......

 

When they released the spec sheet on the g25 I looked at them real hard. The problem I saw is they are longer than the stock turbo. There just doesn't seem to be horizontal room for them. Granted this is based off the spec sheet and not trial and error.

If we could slant them 20° from horizontal they might fit but you can't do that and expect the snail to live.

Sorry Lithium, you are correct. I should have gone into a little more detail. I was thinking for quick spool, which I understand by your reply, and looking at the map, would not be a good marriage. It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

 

Edited by Skylineusa
9 hours ago, Skylineusa said:

It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

I hope you mean a single 770? :o

  • Haha 1

Yeh its interesting.  

I am in the process of getting rid of my HKS F-con rubbish in favour of a Link g4+ and upgrading my trigger system and fuel system at the same time.

Once done the G30-770 be on the next list to replace the -5's.

So sooner they come out the better so someone else test for me.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If it (the code) wasn't still current, it should have gone away by itself by now. No, nothing it 10/10. But it is quite likely. Everything else to do with the ignition could still be responsible (which is wires and connectors). The car is an old piece of shit now, so all the wires and connectors are also old pieces of shit.
    • Lock me in mate, although I'm not sure if I'll be heading up from Goulburn or down from Sydney, either way, return will be back to Goulburn 
    • Sounds good, we will aim to be there! @The Bogan I'll give you a shout if you are heading up to campbelltown for the meet too.
    • Before I get to the test day, just to finish off the android head unit. This is a demo from car start up....the standard/host system takes a few seconds to boot (same as all v37) but Android comes up quickly. In this vid I'm using the delivered launcher but have set the default to Agami since which is easier to navigate when if use primarily 5 apps. You can see the host system still takes over when required eg putting it in reverse, and you can switch between Android and not by holding the back button 3 sec. It is pretty responsive (fast) but you can see I had to press harder than expected a couple of times.  I still have the phone connected to the stock system, and that also seamlessly takes over Android music playing. v37-android-demo.mp4 The bigger reason that I put this in though is so that I can use Ecutek directly on the head unit. That gives me a dash with logging (up to 20MB only), high and low value warnings on any parameter etc etc. I've run a USB cable from the Ecutek OBD dongle to a USB input on the unit, easy. v37-ecutek-demo.mp4   The unit did freeze on the launcher the other day, I think Agami was trying to verify the license when it didn't have a data connection...will monitor and report back if there are any other problems but so far I'm very happy with the upgrade.
    • Nah that is just crappy GPS mapping, I did have a small excursion (cold tyres, damp track, surprise!), will post up that when I get a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...