Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 24/03/2022 at 7:03 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

Yes, I currently have a modified factory plenum with single throttle DBW 

Then just keep the factory plenum :) 

No need to burn more money on a fancy Plazmaman plenum for little gain (if any). It does look good though, billet dis dat albeit for a Rb25 shit box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/3/2022 at 12:14 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Then just keep the factory plenum :) 

No need to burn more money on a fancy Plazmaman plenum for little gain (if any). It does look good though, billet dis dat albeit for a Rb25 shit box.

Yep, my mechanic said, little to no gain in performance, all for aesthetics, problem is, with as far as I’m now going with the car, should I skimp out on this??? 
my personal opinion is, I love the Nismo plenum, but to buy one and cut it up seems…questionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/3/2022 at 10:30 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

If you're going to change it, at least go a Plazmaman or CPC not a Nismo one. Nismo "performance" parts don't really perform if you know what I mean.

(This is my personal opinion 🙂)

maybe a little…😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nismo plenum only makes sense if you want a few key design elements like the longest intake runners you can fit in a factory ITB setup and the different intake runner designs to avoid leaning out cylinder 6 to some extent. A single plenum design like the Nismo as far as I can tell will never actually work perfectly at equalizing airflow between cylinders. Dollar for dollar it is a horrible upgrade IMO but I have weird priorities. HKS is working on a dual plenum design that may be more what you're looking for and will be single DBW throttle body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/3/2022 at 11:13 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

He's still using the factory ITB, you're planning on chopping it to fit a single DBW TB which will affect the way air flows and distributes across the runners at partial throttle.

Something I haven’t considered, I am leaning towards getting the Plazmaman plenum. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/03/2022 at 6:28 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

In my quest to catch up to R32 25T, things are moving forward, more parts back from cerakote. Hoping to order the gearbox next week. 

All your cerakoted parts look great and it seems to suit a wide range of parts. I was thinking of having front and rear hoon bars, miscellaneous brackets, Apexi pod elbows, battery retainer bar and the ugly retainer that the throttle cable passes through done.

Do you think anything on that list isn’t suitable? I googled this for at least 60 seconds but most of the articles were about how it would improve the longevity of the assault rifle that I don't own.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/3/2022 at 4:53 PM, Robzilla32 said:

All your cerakoted parts look great and it seems to suit a wide range of parts. I was thinking of having front and rear hoon bars, miscellaneous brackets, Apexi pod elbows, battery retainer bar and the ugly retainer that the throttle cable passes through done.

Do you think anything on that list isn’t suitable? I googled this for at least 60 seconds but most of the articles were about how it would improve the longevity of the assault rifle that I don't own.

That is all suitable, They can even do plastic parts, he showed me a fuse box cover from a VL he did, looked brand new. I’ve given him a few plastic parts, I’ll post them when I get them back. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

More parts ordered, more parts coming in, Nismo restoration! Pfft, got nothing on me. Lmao 

Also got brand new headlights. 

Had the engine bay ceramic coated by my Detailer while it’s bare, came up a treat. 

BCB8A031-BBAE-49E7-8571-CB36A1A782AB.jpeg

E2FC344B-1982-4565-B09E-8E9CA1CE52FC.jpeg

A594FC13-0FA6-460A-A5E5-43EF39F1AAD1.jpeg

9555371C-522D-48D7-8444-71F51C77FA6A.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full resto!

That engine bay is going to look amazing once all back together.  Are you doing anything funky like wire tucking, brake line redirection or anything else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2022 at 8:35 AM, Shoota_77 said:

Full resto!

That engine bay is going to look amazing once all back together.  Are you doing anything funky like wire tucking, brake line redirection or anything else?

I’m getting Pro wire to do a custom engine loom to incorporate all the extra sensors, DBW etc, still haven’t decided weather I’ll delete the fuse box and run everything off a PDM. I want to change ECU to the Motec M150, just got to talk to a couple of people to see what my options are. 
I’m moving away from the factory plenum and will be running the Plazmaman. I’ve finally decided on gearbox and will be running a 6 speed getrag box. 
also contemplating changing turbo, I’ve bought a 68/75 turbo which has the .81 T4 open rear (I believe) 

considering changing to the Garrett G40 1150 using the .95 T4 divided rear . 
manifold I’m using is a 6 boost T4 divided 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/04/2022 at 10:17 AM, Old man 32 GTR said:

I’m getting Pro wire to do a custom engine loom to incorporate all the extra sensors, DBW etc, still haven’t decided weather I’ll delete the fuse box and run everything off a PDM. I want to change ECU to the Motec M150, just got to talk to a couple of people to see what my options are. 
I’m moving away from the factory plenum and will be running the Plazmaman. I’ve finally decided on gearbox and will be running a 6 speed getrag box. 
also contemplating changing turbo, I’ve bought a 68/75 turbo which has the .81 T4 open rear (I believe) 

considering changing to the Garrett G40 1150 using the .95 T4 divided rear . 
manifold I’m using is a 6 boost T4 divided 

Getting serious!  Will be an absolute weapon! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2022 at 11:26 AM, Shoota_77 said:

Getting serious!  Will be an absolute weapon! 

Hoping for a nice reliable street car, but am going overboard in some areas,  and I do know that, but… GTR life! Lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as my plans on set up change more then my underwear I’ve decided to strengthen up the bottom end of the motor while it’s out of the car. 
will be installing a PRP brace with billet main caps and 1/2 inch main studs.

will make final decision tomorrow, but will probably get the 7675 sportsman with 1.12 T4 divided rear with a proper divided manifold. 
At this stage I’m thinking (and this will probably change 10 times before the car is done) but will run the getrag for a couple of years and enjoy the car for street duties, then I’ll just bite the bullet and put either an Albins or Samsonas in it and do the track stuff. 
I’ve spoken to a couple of people I know who are running similar turbos, (both have 2.7, one running 7675, other 7685) and both say it’s not as laggy as you’d think, but crazy fast when it’s on. 🤔

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...