Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G30 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30turbineflowmap

 

G35 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35turbineflowmap

The compressor flow chart :

 

770 :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30-770comp-map

 

The 900 one :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-900comp-map

 

and finally the 1050 one :

 

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-1050comp-map

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

6 hours ago, R_34 said:

 

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

Understood, and very much appreciated - thanks for sharing - that's awesome.

I'm pretty confident they are legit, btw.  Just probably weren't meant to be released yet

I've had a quick play with that data, and if I am looking at it right - the 1.01a/r G30 hotside is very comparable to the 1.05a/r EFR8374 hotside which puts things into perspective.


The .83a/r G30 hotside falls slightly short of the .82a/r GT35 hotside in flow.   I think Garrett have chosen some very nice spread of options with this range.

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/04/2019 at 4:41 PM, Phat_Toni said:

The g25 660 with the 0.92 looks comparable to the GT3076r but seems to have the edge in turbine flow, compressor flow and spool. 

g25 660 0.92 from ATS 

6boost mani

 

I saw a post on Sinco NZ's Instagram page which made me think of you, how is your build going?  Did you end up going Sinco for the manifold or is there someone else doing similar?

image.png.676e27afa0879be80102e5c2f3a98f37.png

1 hour ago, Skylineusa said:

This page is gold with great information. Thank you guys! Would running twin 550 be a worthwhile combo? 

That's a very open ended question.  For what power target and on what kind of setup??  Do you have the budget and inclination to do all the fabrication to do twin 550s? (it's not something you'd do on stock manifolds/location). 

It is the kind of setup which to justify would need a pretty solid engine spec, basically its a 1000hp turbo setup so expect the kind of lag that would come with one and expect to need to do the kind of engine and transmission development needed to support it.   If you are looking at making the typical kind of power that people go for with low mount twins then no, imho it is not worth doing.

5 minutes ago, Phat_Toni said:

I think this car was mentioned earlier in the thread. Gives a good idea as what to expect from 2 of these things....

 

It's worth nothing a couple of things he says which contradict each other, he implies it spools 500rpm better than the EFR9180 but then also says its all in between 6000-7000rpm which on a 2.8 is... umm... much laggier than any EFR9180 I've heard of.

It's been previously said that it's got a 500rpm wider powerband as the 660s hold on (unsurprisingly) to much higher rpm than the EFR9180 and other turbo setups they ran on it, so if you are willing to rev it to 9000+rpm then it offers the potential to give a broad delivery - as long as you aren't hoping for things to happen earlier in the rev range.

Be great to get some more data points from that car.  

 

The twin G25-550 intrigues me as well.  They do the internal gate T2 .49 which screams bolt me on an RB26.

I've be told by a seller its not a bolt on affair though. I was not given any details other than you have a 30 year old car "dude" as to why. 

The cost of them makes it a serious investment and a risk you end up with a street pig.

If not and they make 900-1000fwhp with amazing spool  ..... all the glory is yours  ......

 

When they released the spec sheet on the g25 I looked at them real hard. The problem I saw is they are longer than the stock turbo. There just doesn't seem to be horizontal room for them. Granted this is based off the spec sheet and not trial and error.

If we could slant them 20° from horizontal they might fit but you can't do that and expect the snail to live.

Sorry Lithium, you are correct. I should have gone into a little more detail. I was thinking for quick spool, which I understand by your reply, and looking at the map, would not be a good marriage. It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

 

Edited by Skylineusa
9 hours ago, Skylineusa said:

It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

I hope you mean a single 770? :o

  • Haha 1

Yeh its interesting.  

I am in the process of getting rid of my HKS F-con rubbish in favour of a Link g4+ and upgrading my trigger system and fuel system at the same time.

Once done the G30-770 be on the next list to replace the -5's.

So sooner they come out the better so someone else test for me.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...