Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For what it's worth I am considering the a very similar setup, but I was planning on going the TS T4 option on a 6boost.

If I had a RB25 I would consider it on the stock manifold like you are, but I may even consider going 7163 if you're happy to stop at 300KW which is going to be very very lively on a street tyre. There's a couple of results from a 1J making 320kw without maxing it out, which is also a 2.5. If you want more than that though the 7670 is what I'd be choosing as well.

If I was using the stock manifold I wouldn't be going an adapter plate because... well, it's just one more thing that can go wrong. If you think of the 7670 like a GTX3076R, the .83 rear seems like it's a pretty suitable size, I don't think you'd gain much/anything at all going to a T4 .92 adaptor plate on a stock mani.

Ive been watching yours and discopotato's posts, I'd be happy with the 7163 as 300-320kw with insane street response is right where I want to be but some warned about surging because of the .80 hot side maybe being a bit small. This is were Im beating my head against the wall like you, trying to pick the right turbo and A/R cause that now brings the 7064 into the picture as well.

I have to go low mount I/W to try to be as much stealth as possible 

Thanks for your input

Keep in mind there is very (!) limited room when using a 7064 or 7670 with the OEM manifold on the RB25, even more so on the R34 GTT than on the R33 GTST (strut tower on the R34 is about 1,5cm closer to the engine). Not sure if using an adaptor to go twinscroll would make it easier or harder.

The 7163 is a smaller turbo (shorter as well), because it's B1 frame and not B2 frame like the 7064 and bigger.

I have a 7064 T3 on my OEM manifold on the R34 GTT at the moment, but wouldn't do it again. We even had to remove the AC because making the downpipe with the AC in would have been much harder (though probably not impossible). Other than that my EGT are way high, not sure why that is, but decided to go 6 boost top mount + plazmaman intake anyway.

Edit: If I had to choose again, I'd probably go 7163 (wasn't available at the time I purchased my 7064).

Pictures attached for reference (BW EFR 7064 T3 IWG, OEM manifold RB25DET Neo, R34 GTT).

IMAG3585.jpg

IMAG3586.jpg

Edited by MotHot
  • Like 4

Mothot I thought of the T3 single scroll IW version too and it will be very interesting to see your results .

As for the 7163 the only hands on feedback I have is that the 7064 is a bit more responsive and tends to work better on engines that don't have brilliant volumetric efficiency levels . Gut feeling is that the wheels are getting big for B1 frame sized housings but I'd say that's part of the compromise for having the flow capacity and packaging a bit more easily .

I'm wondering how the 7064 and 7670 compare in single scroll IW form to the GT3076R 0.82 IW T3 turbos . Geoff has said that the 7670 is getting bigish for an RB25 but if its any more responsive than the GT3076R 0.82 AR then its still not too bad . The big question is will the standard exhaust manifold keep up flow wise with a 7670 ?

A .

 

Standard exhaust manifold is too restrictive.

I'm sure you'll ignore my post Adrian, but at least others reading will get some information. 

Moving an external gate from the turbine house onto the stock manifold netted an easy 20kW on my car with the same timing, same tune put out 350kW. The motor than was happy to take more timing as well due to the lower back pressure on the exhaust side. Overall with the same SS2 HyperGear turbo  (except the centre being ball bearing instead of journal) I went from 330kW to 372kW and that's with me stopping myself pushing the stock motor further. 

  • Like 1

What you want out of the car would probably be a better yardstick. One thing to remember about cams is you already had 246 duration ones in there, so its not like you've completely changed the engine

Either up to 400 kW with smaller turbo or 450 kW + with the 8374. Currently got was in basically an airwerks 8370 now with 380ish now. About half a bar boost at 3500 rpm. 

I think the efr 8374 will be similar response wise with more power.

The 7670 better response wise with similar power. 

Any ideas?

Where I'm at now is a bit boring.

54 minutes ago, Griffin said:

I'm only up for the cost of turbo. You think go bigger?

that  is my gut feeling based off all i've ever read.
Hopefully I'll go pick up my car running (on run in tune) when i get home ont he 14th of Feb.. so might have more first hand advice to say about it then...
Also know someone up here doing a 7670 on theirs so will get to ride in that and get a somewhat comparison

I'm a bit confused, I didn't think 7670 would make high 300s on a 26?

I had a chat with Geoff about and he was suggesting the 8374 instead.

I'm like a few of you, want the most responsive 500rwhp or so street setup.

I do have N1 manifolds (wanted bigger.but cast) a full 3.5" exhaust and e85 to help though, oh and about to fit Kelford L182-A drop ins.

Full-race has dyno sheets and videos on their website of a supra running a 7670 and it makes 489.61hp in the video and 524.75hp on the dyno sheet http://www.full-race.com/store/efr-series/turbos-efr-series/borgwarner-efr-7670-turbo-2.html/. There's also plenty of evo results with the 7670 making 500hp+ and in the old borg warner thread someone went 500hp with a 7670 on their RB25. Where is the confusion coming from?

4 hours ago, Sick_R31 said:

Full-race has dyno sheets and videos on their website of a supra running a 7670 and it makes 489.61hp in the video and 524.75hp on the dyno sheet http://www.full-race.com/store/efr-series/turbos-efr-series/borgwarner-efr-7670-turbo-2.html/. There's also plenty of evo results with the 7670 making 500hp+ and in the old borg warner thread something went 500hp with a 7670 on their RB25. Where is the confusion coming from?

Dyno Dynamics rwhp or USS dyno rwhp?

  • Like 1

This is some indication of what the 7670 can do, they do not use WHP for the tests  but BHP (crank) I think, but there is always the question about the US Dynos reading higher , so ??

 

EFR 7670 is ideal for road racing and time attack applications, as well as responsive high power street driven vehicles. Engineered for great spool, quick response and the potential to surpass 640hp - the 7670 is capable of 64lb/min compressor flow - unheard of for this size compressor wheel. The 7670 is an excellent turbocharger for road racing and time attack applications, as well as responsive high power street driven vehicles.

The general concencus around here is that a 7670 would make at most 400kw but more likely high 300's, so not sure why you're thinking it wouldnt, I can't think of anyone saying that at all to be honest.

 

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Dyno Dynamics rwhp or USS dyno rwhp?

Well click on the full-race link to determine which one the supra is, the evo results would be a mix of those 2 and the RB25 result is in the old borg warner thread, the car is from nsw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...